Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
What agenda? The teacher IS teaching. A very simple explanation about gender identity. Period. The end.
Her job isn't teaching gender identification. It's no different than if she were handing out pamphlets on comparing violins to flutes, and why different people would choose one or the other....but she's a science teacher. It's not relevant to her job, and the school didn't tell her to do it. It's a controversial topic (gender unicorn?).
I have posted many times about the various agendas against children in our educational system today. People have asked for examples, so here is yet another example of our school systems trying to confuse children about their "identities" and sexualize them at an early age. It is really sick and twisted.
Read up on this latest example with middle schoolers, "the gender unicorn," and the teacher pushing this agenda on these young kids who demands to be called "Mx." instead of Mr.
Middle school children already have the hormones to be considered sexual. It's legal in some states for kids that age to get married.
While I think the teacher shouldn't have passed those things out, and it's irrelevant to her/his job, as well as controversial, it's not something that is "against" children.
This is a great way to push more parents to send their kids to private school, or home school them instead.
I think just the opposite. It presents a great opportunity to address this issue with the kids, since they'll run across this everywhere. On tv, in schools, with talk among friends, on the internet, and certainly when they enter the work force.
The teacher shouldn't have done that and should stick to his job of teaching his subject(s) he was hired for. But it's not a reason to pull a kid from public school, IMO.
These are not 21st century labels. They are the ramblings of the mentally insane, who happen to scream and shout louder than you, so they get their way. Just go along with it, I guess that's what everyone else is doing.
Wow.
I wonder how some of you reacted when Ms. joined Mrs. and Miss in common usage in the early 70s.
Transgenderism exists, so I have no objection in theory to it being taught.
The problem is that everyone will want everything to be on that list. Nobody will realistically be able to keep up. I’m trans-and-other-friendly, and frankly if you ask me politely to call you a Pandakin, I’ll happily do it. But let’s be honest and also acknowledge the labeling is out of control.
Transgenderism exists, so I have no objection in theory to it being taught.
The problem is that everyone will want everything to be on that list. Nobody will realistically be able to keep up. I’m trans-and-other-friendly, and frankly if you ask me politely to call you a Pandakin, I’ll happily do it. But let’s be honest and also acknowledge the labeling is out of control.
I've seen this: LGBTQIA and even some longer ones.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
