Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Crowd size isn’t necessarily a perfect predictor of political success, but there’s a reason Donald Trump consistently lies and brags about his attendance numbers. Massive crowds can be a real gauge of enthusiasm. They can show how well a message is resonating. And as Warren works her way up the polls, it’s clear that what she’s saying resonates.
“When you see a government that works great for the rich, that works great for the wealthy and the well-connected and is not working so well for everyone else, that is corruption, pure and simple,” she told the crowd.
I haven't heard anything more about the Seattle crowd, but I have heard that some are now estimating the Minnesota crowd to be less than half the 12,000 estimate.
Crowd size isn’t necessarily a perfect predictor of political success, but there’s a reason Donald Trump consistently lies and brags about his attendance numbers. Massive crowds can be a real gauge of enthusiasm. They can show how well a message is resonating. And as Warren works her way up the polls, it’s clear that what she’s saying resonates.
“When you see a government that works great for the rich, that works great for the wealthy and the well-connected and is not working so well for everyone else, that is corruption, pure and simple,” she told the crowd.
Warren is a talented politician, no doubt. She knows how to push buttons, and can tailor her message to almost any audience. But the message she's selling is, at it's core, just so distasteful. Here she explains to an 11-year-old Canadian how terrible, mean and racist the president of the United States is:
She will certainly generate enthusiasm and make a strong run at the Dem nomination. But there's just no way for her to win a general election. It's inconceivable.
Last edited by The Dark Enlightenment; 08-31-2019 at 11:43 PM..
Warren is a talented politician, no doubt. She knows how to push buttons, and can tailor her message to almost any audience. But the message she's selling is, at it's core, just so distasteful. Here she explains to an 11-year-old Canadian how terrible, mean and racist the president of the United States is:
She will certainly generate enthusiasm and make a strong run at the Dem nomination. But there's just no way for her to win a general election. It's inconceivable.
I don't know who to vote for but I doubt it will be Warren and definitely not Trump again (my plan is to not re-vote for him!
I couldn't vote for Trump the first time around or Hillary. So I voted for the Libertarian candidate. I won't be surprised if I have to do it again in 2020.
Instead of complaining about them, why not join them? Federal government jobs may be unionized. You may get a pension plus a retirement savings account so you can double dip when you retire and triple dip when you start drawing Social Security.
From almost day one, my money was on Elizabeth Warren getting the Democrat nomination. But I think as well there is no way she’ll win a presidential election. That’s the conundrum Democrats now find themselves in.
My guess is the Democrat nominee will be Biden with Warren as vice president to get the female vote. Of course, Republicans are anxious to point out that Democrats have run a woman before for vice president and they lost quite decisively.
Crowd size isn’t necessarily a perfect predictor of political success, but there’s a reason Donald Trump consistently lies and brags about his attendance numbers. Massive crowds can be a real gauge of enthusiasm. They can show how well a message is resonating. And as Warren works her way up the polls, it’s clear that what she’s saying resonates.
“When you see a government that works great for the rich, that works great for the wealthy and the well-connected and is not working so well for everyone else, that is corruption, pure and simple,” she told the crowd.
o you would vote for a person who lied about their ethic background, was called incompetent by Senator Dodd of the democrats, and is a self-confessed socialist who is bought and paid for by big corporations
she has been screwing the little guys for decades
she doesn't care about the middleclass or consumer protection..
if she did she would have made sure fannie/Freddie was in the dodd-frank bill
ELIZABETH WARREN SOLD OUT TO BIG INSURANCE AND FOUGHT AGAINST ASBESTOS VICTIMS.....“She’s Supposed To Be A Consumer Advocate?((((Elizabeth Warren denied that she had worked for Traveler’s Insurance, the nation’s largest insurance company, against asbestos victims....... documents, both the legal briefs Warren filed on behalf of Travelers, and Warren’s financial disclosures showing that she received over $212,000 for her work, tell a different story.)))))
Before retiring, then Senator Christopher J. Dodd (D-Conn.), co-author of the Dodd-Frank regulatory reform bill that created the consumer agency, urged Obama to put somebody else in the job—a vote of no confidence , even retired Senator Chriss Dodd thinks she is INCOMPETENT
so you could easily vote for a corporatist , liar, who is incompetent???, bet you voted for hitlery too
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
