Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Crowd size isn’t necessarily a perfect predictor of political success, but there’s a reason Donald Trump consistently lies and brags about his attendance numbers. Massive crowds can be a real gauge of enthusiasm. They can show how well a message is resonating. And as Warren works her way up the polls, it’s clear that what she’s saying resonates.
“When you see a government that works great for the rich, that works great for the wealthy and the well-connected and is not working so well for everyone else, that is corruption, pure and simple,” she told the crowd.
There are several issues with China, each needs its own response. The biggest problem is theft of American IP and for that we need to work with our allies to block all sales of any products that have stolen IP in them. Working with our allies is foreign to Trump since he has turned them all against us.
Chinese currency manipulation is an issue for a trade treaty like TPP which Trump pulled out of. Realistically, currency manipulation in the past favored the US so we didn't complain. But they are now manipulating it to mitigate the impact of tariffs, so once the tariffs go away, the manipulation will go away.
Aggression in the South China Sea is a diplomatic/military issue, again with our allies. It has nothing to do with trade.
Status:
"Let's replace the puppet show with actual leadership."
(set 4 days ago)
Location: Suburban Dallas
52,709 posts, read 48,010,235 times
Reputation: 33905
Quote:
Originally Posted by AguaDulce
Crowd size isn’t necessarily a perfect predictor of political success, but there’s a reason Donald Trump consistently lies and brags about his attendance numbers. Massive crowds can be a real gauge of enthusiasm. They can show how well a message is resonating. And as Warren works her way up the polls, it’s clear that what she’s saying resonates.
“When you see a government that works great for the rich, that works great for the wealthy and the well-connected and is not working so well for everyone else, that is corruption, pure and simple,” she told the crowd.
Vanity Fair??? Seriously?? Why would anybody be led to believe that Elizabeth Warren or any other leftist would draw big crowds? Something's very suspect and very fake about that article, when the truth is, President Trump is drawing way more people and his supporters have way more enthusiasm. It's the hard truth, and I know that some of y'all have immense trouble with that. And you already know that there have really been no big crowds with leftist candidates.
I doubt that any Vanity Fair reporter has even been to a Trump rally or spent any time searching the internet when the evidence has been there all along.
I don't think Warren is drawing crowds, and who wants to listen to someone who sounds like the complaining neighbor next door? The OP's choice of article is full of lies, y'all. Face up to it. The left does not have any kind of a message and many Democrats are not inspired right now. Fauxcahontas is no different. How can hatred resonate with anyone? It can't. The left doesn't care, though. They are simply fueled with bitter hatred and nothing else. They're mad that they're not controlling and destroying you and I right now, and that's why the hate is there.
Here's a related article, but this is a more telling story:
And why is Fauxcahontas campaigning in Seattle?? Crowd or no crowd, she's practically preaching to the choir in that cesspool. If she wants to make a serious dent with those with whom she disagrees, then she needs to try campaigning in conservative areas. And good luck with that.
I'm wondering how Warren gets past her status as the Rachel Dolezal of Native Americans. Especially since Harvard Law deliberately touted blonde hair blue eye Liz as a Native American woman in 1996 to "prove" their commitment to diversity:
Quote:
"Of 71 current Law School professors and assistant professors, 11 are women, five are black, one is Native American and one is Hispanic, said Mike Chmura, spokesperson for the Law School.
Although the conventional wisdom among students and faculty is that the Law School faculty includes no minority women, Chmura said Professor of Law Elizabeth Warren is Native American."
I'm wondering how Warren gets past her status as the Rachel Dolezal of Native Americans. Especially since Harvard Law deliberately touted blonde hair blue eye Liz as a Native American woman in 1996 to "prove" their commitment to diversity:
Blatant cultural (mis)appropriation for personal gain and profit. The left has come down HARD on that.
The MEDIA and Democrats (same thing) want to BURY THIS. More, and more as Biden is obviously failing, and Bernie is just another old white guy, Warren will be their pick.
Warren is a liar, and devout Communist. She is also almost as UNLIKEABLE as Hillary, and that is hard to do.
I couldn't vote for Trump the first time around or Hillary. So I voted for the Libertarian candidate. I won't be surprised if I have to do it again in 2020.
You voted for Trump. Do you want to give him another term and more seats on the SC?
You voted for Trump. Do you want to give him another term and more seats on the SC?
Trump should win another term as he's done a great deal of good in placing Constitutionalist judges in Federal Courts and the Supreme Court. One of the best SCOTUS rulings in decades actually restored 5th Amendment Property Rights to all Americans when SCOTUS overturned Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson City in the Knick v. Township of Scott ruling.
(Breathing a sigh of relief) Ok, I was worried about you, Rachel.
I get it, but don't see where the notion comes from that Biden could beat Trump. Granted, he might well **** off fewer people than Warren. On the other hand, there are lots of misguided women out there who would support Warren for the same reason they supported Hillary.
Actually, I'd be more worried about Kamala Harris....am surprised though pleased that she hasn't done better in the polls.
Bottom line is....nobody's going to beat Trump and Hillary will spend the next 4 years gloating about how much better she did in 2016 than the 2020 loser will. It won't even be close - regardless of who they run.
Americans genuinely like having Trump as their President - more so than any in my lifetime, including Reagan. Simply by being honest and direct, dispensing with the PC BS, doing our business they way we want it done, he has raised the bar to a level not seen by anyone alive today.
2020 is safe, but there will be big lines of people cashing in their chips in late 2024. There will have never been a tougher act to follow....at least in modern times.
So interesting the notions crawling around in your brain. You live in Trump's fantasy, apparently. Enjoy your thought cocoon.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The OP's choice of article is full of lies, y'all. Face up to it. The left does not have any kind of a message and many Democrats are not inspired right now. Fauxcahontas is no different. How can hatred resonate with anyone? It can't. The left doesn't care, though. They are simply fueled with bitter hatred and nothing else. They're mad that they're not controlling and destroying you and I right now, and that's why the hate is there.
