Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The real problem I have with the climate change narrative is the long time scales involved. I'm sorry, but I think we've got bigger fish to fry between now and then. Plastics in the ocean. Obesity epidemic. Parents who don't know how to raise children. The drug epidemic. The soaring rates of childhood mental diseases. The list goes on and on.
Somehow, I get the feeling we're going to meet our demise long before the climate change boogeyman gets us. He's just too darned slow.
It’s not realistic to ask everyone on the planet to revert to a pre-industrial existence. It’s not going to happen. Look at what happens when there is an extended blackout in a developed country.
Right now, the only economical alternative to fossil fuels is nuclear fission. If we really want to make big reductions in co2 emissions, we will need to rapidly deploy nuclear power. There are new small modular reactors (SMRs) that are much less likely to melt down. Yes, there is still the problem of nuclear waste, but it’s arguably better than human extinction (assuming global warming really is an existential threat).
Otherwise it is a case of contrarian nature inbred in democrat socialists and liberals. Their refrain, no matter the issue, 'if the other is for it, we are against it'.
Justified, because they believe the other side to be invalid, unethical and immoral and any argument therefore is invalid by association.
Liberals prefer to live in a theoretical world divorced from reality. To make their point, they lie, exaggerate and embellish to defer reality in favor of unattainable theory.
Otherwise it is a case of contrarian nature inbred in democrat socialists and liberals. Their refrain, no matter the issue, 'if the other is for it, we are against it'.
Justified, because they believe the other side to be invalid, unethical and immoral and any argument therefore is invalid by association.
Liberals prefer to live in a theoretical world divorced from reality. To make their point, they lie, exaggerate and embellish to defer reality in favor of unattainable theory.
This has been a Krecer daily rant. There will be more liberal rants after these messages..
It's not just the Dems. It's the Reps. It's everybody.
However, we "reps" don't believe in the climate change hoax, thus there is no need for "action" on our part.
Dems sound the alarm about AGW, then do nothing, as they are too lazy and enjoy their lifestyle too much.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Climate hysteria: Liberal governments in America approving bans on natural gas appliances and balloons
