Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
– There is no “whistleblower” (he/she wasn’t on the call)
– The person who was painted as a “whistleblower” has a political bias against the President.
– The lawyer for the “whistleblower” works for the Clintons.
The “whistleblower,” knowing that he/she does not qualify under that statute, is now trying to cover-ass.
Because this is not only a diplomatic failure of the very highest order, but also a felony. This person should be exposed, then punished most severely.
Heads of State are entitled to speak candidly to their colleagues under conditions of Top Secrecy – knowing, of course, that they are being overhead by staff, friend, and enemy alike, but that their conversations will not be made public unless one of them chooses to do so. (Thereby “de-classifying the information by mention,” as they alone are entitled to do.)
These conversations, although overheard by many, are Top Secret. The participants in the conversation are entitled to disclose their content merely by mentioning it, but no one else can.
Hence the whistle blower immediately lawyering up with Clinton/Clapper lawyers. They know they are in trouble.
Trump supporters trying to discredit anyone that exposes Trump's corrupt. We've seen this lame play over and over again. Trump is a lying fraud who can't win an election without foreign interference. He knows it.
Trump supporters trying to discredit anyone that exposes Trump's corrupt. We've seen this lame play over and over again. Trump is a lying fraud who can't win an election without foreign interference. He knows it.
How is Trump's asking the Ukraine's head of state to investigate Biden's own self-admitted extortion (admitted on video, and he bragged about it) of the Ukraine into firing their prosecutor who just happened to be investigating Burisma of which Biden's son was a board member, corrupt? It's actually the exact opposite.
– There is no “whistleblower” (he/she wasn’t on the call)
– The person who was painted as a “whistleblower” has a political bias against the President.
– The lawyer for the “whistleblower” works for the Clintons.
The “whistleblower,” knowing that he/she does not qualify under that statute, is now trying to cover-ass.
Because this is not only a diplomatic failure of the very highest order, but also a felony. This person should be exposed, then punished most severely.
Heads of State are entitled to speak candidly to their colleagues under conditions of Top Secrecy – knowing, of course, that they are being overhead by staff, friend, and enemy alike, but that their conversations will not be made public unless one of them chooses to do so. (Thereby “de-classifying the information by mention,” as they alone are entitled to do.)
These conversations, although overheard by many, are Top Secret. The participants in the conversation are entitled to disclose their content merely by mentioning it, but no one else can.
Hence the whistle blower immediately lawyering up with Clinton/Clapper lawyers. They know they are in trouble.
The orange maniac knows he is the one in trouble.
He asked a foreign head of state to work with his personal attorney and his attorney general to dig up dirt on his political rival.
– There is no “whistleblower” (he/she wasn’t on the call)
– The person who was painted as a “whistleblower” has a political bias against the President.
– The lawyer for the “whistleblower” works for the Clintons.
The “whistleblower,” knowing that he/she does not qualify under that statute, is now trying to cover-ass.
Because this is not only a diplomatic failure of the very highest order, but also a felony. This person should be exposed, then punished most severely.
Heads of State are entitled to speak candidly to their colleagues under conditions of Top Secrecy – knowing, of course, that they are being overhead by staff, friend, and enemy alike, but that their conversations will not be made public unless one of them chooses to do so. (Thereby “de-classifying the information by mention,” as they alone are entitled to do.)
These conversations, although overheard by many, are Top Secret. The participants in the conversation are entitled to disclose their content merely by mentioning it, but no one else can.
Hence the whistle blower immediately lawyering up with Clinton/Clapper lawyers. They know they are in trouble.
Doesn't really matter since Traitor-Trump has already confessed.
How is Trump's asking the Ukraine's head of state to investigate Biden's own self-admitted extortion (admitted on video, and he bragged about it) of the Ukraine into firing their prosecutor who just happened to be investigating Burisma of which Biden's son was a board member, corrupt? It's actually the exact opposite.
So true, these Dims can't stop cutting off their noses to spite their own face. Dims want impeachment so bad, but it's not there, and they're destroying whatever last vestige of credibility the DNC had.
Trump did nothing wrong. He said, essentially, "I heard a crime may have been committed, could you look into it? He in no way suggested what the outcome of the investigation should be, nor did he threaten.
When you go once the swamp to hunt rats, sometimes they bite your ankle. I hope we find out who this “whistleblower” is. The call transcript trumps whatever 2nd or 3rd hand knowledge this person had about the call, now they have nothing to add. Probably regretting the move already
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
