Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-07-2019, 08:23 PM
 
18,561 posts, read 7,405,949 times
Reputation: 11384

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brave New World View Post
White woman (possible mentally ill) and Black cop.

In terms of scissors would taser not have been more appropriate rather than straight to firearms.


It's murder. I'm not buying the "imperfect self-defense equals manslaughter" argument.

You can't shoot a woman with scissors unless you're wheelchair-bound or a few other outlandish situations I could dream up. I wish this were in Texas where, all of a sudden, we've decided we are going to hold cops accountable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-07-2019, 08:26 PM
 
18,561 posts, read 7,405,949 times
Reputation: 11384
Quote:
Originally Posted by ottomobeale View Post
Distance cop to perp when she was shot?
It doesn't matter unless he was cornered, and even then it probably shouldn't matter. It's practically a certainty that if you just use your hands to defend yourself against that woman, you will survive. And you're paid to take that tiny risk that you won't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2019, 08:28 PM
 
18,561 posts, read 7,405,949 times
Reputation: 11384
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeutralParty View Post
He warned her multiple times to drop the weapon. She approached him with a sharp object so he shot her. The cop did the right thing.
Hell, no, he didn't. The right thing is to retreat. She was not a threat, and you can't kill people just to save time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2019, 08:31 PM
 
19,966 posts, read 7,901,168 times
Reputation: 6556
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brave New World View Post
They should be trained to de-esculate, wait for back-up and use only necessary force, and perhaps more training in relation to the mentally ill might also help.

Given that officers can take people down with objects such as scissors with a taser or other non lethal, or through rush tactics and shields, as is done every day of the week in terms of violent prisoners with shanks by teams of prison officers.

Mental Health nurses also manage to contain dangerous people without resorting to firearms, and in terms of the UK, the vast majority of police don't even carry a firearm in the first place.

If the woman had pointed a gun at the officers then fair enough, however shooting someone for pointing a pair of scissors is not fair enough, not does it constitute reasonable or necessary force, and that is the law in a lot of western countries outside of the US.
I won't say you are wrong that today in America police are very quick to shoot. I'm not saying this was a good example of being too quick to shoot. There are worse examples.

I do think to a degree this became more the rules of engagement maybe in the 1990s following Supreme Court ruling. It seemed in the past American cops were less likely to shoot and more willing to try to overpower a suspect or contain the suspect. I'm trying to think of an example... Jack Ruby shot Oswald and the officer escorting Oswald grabbed the gun and wrestled it away. I can't imagine police today doing anything but drawing their guns and firing.

America has always been more violent and rough and tumble than England being carved out of a frontier and with so much diversity, especially more violent by the 1960s. The rules probably have to be different. I can see a future where European and British police might have to become more aggressive.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2019, 12:00 AM
 
6,835 posts, read 2,410,856 times
Reputation: 2727
Quote:
Originally Posted by hbdwihdh378y9 View Post
Hell, no, he didn't. The right thing is to retreat. She was not a threat, and you can't kill people just to save time.
While ideally giving the suspect a few "Stop or I will shoot"-type warnings would help, realistically that doesn't always happen. There are times where spur of the moment reactions like shooting a suspect occur will occur. From a retrospective standpoint, might have such a decision been a bad or good idea? Depends.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2019, 12:18 AM
 
Location: Florida
9,569 posts, read 5,646,354 times
Reputation: 12025
Quote:
Originally Posted by Berteau View Post
https://www.latimes.com/world-nation...ack-woman-home

Here are your protests. SO where are the ones for the white lady??
You can't tell the difference between a unarmed woman sitting in her home minding her own business being killed by a police officer and a deranged woman with scissors about to attack a police officer who repeatedly warned her to disarm?

It really is that simple.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2019, 12:20 AM
 
Location: Houston
26,979 posts, read 15,927,270 times
Reputation: 11259
Quote:
Originally Posted by hbdwihdh378y9 View Post
It's murder. I'm not buying the "imperfect self-defense equals manslaughter" argument.

You can't shoot a woman with scissors unless you're wheelchair-bound or a few other outlandish situations I could dream up. I wish this were in Texas where, all of a sudden, we've decided we are going to hold cops accountable.
Here in Texas you can stand your ground. Good shoot.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2019, 01:40 AM
 
Location: Itinerant
8,278 posts, read 6,288,800 times
Reputation: 6681
Watching the store corner cam. Not sure it was a good shoot.

Couple of things.

1) Cop is wearing a vest, that provides protection from stabbing objects like scissors. It covers major organs.

2) The Cop is 6' or more the womans boobs barely clear a 3.5' counter

3) Tuler drill only applies to your holstered weapon, once it's in your hands pointed at the target 21' isn't minimum safe distance.

When she was yelling behind the counter CS her. Issue resolved.

Grab a chair and pin her she's tiny a chair will prevent serious injury.

Call for back up, and wait, no one in there seems particularly afraid for their life, even the cop, he even tells one guy to get out after she was shot. More than once during the altercation when she makes an aggressive move he steps forward, that's not a fear response, it's an aggressive response.

After the shoot, he stands covering her, rather than clearing the area and restraining her to administer aid. That could have saved her life too.

It is what it is. Probably not enough to say it wasn't a good shoot, but, it was handled badly and didn't need to end with the woman dying.

And yeah the guys a cop, he signed up to take risks we wouldn't and that includes the risk of being injured. Cops need to accept this and deal with it. When was the last time you heard fire fighters complain about the risk of being burned? Almost never. Interesting you hear about the risks cops take every 6 seconds.
__________________
My mod posts will always be in red.
The RulesInfractions & DeletionsWho's the moderator? • FAQ • What is a "Personal Attack" • What is "Trolling" • Guidelines for copyrighted material.

Last edited by Gungnir; 11-08-2019 at 01:52 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2019, 01:50 AM
 
Location: Various
9,049 posts, read 3,535,705 times
Reputation: 5470
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeutralParty View Post
because it was either her or the police officer.
Yes, those were the only two possible outcomes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2019, 03:05 AM
 
Location: Metro Seattle Area - Born and Raised
4,935 posts, read 2,081,761 times
Reputation: 8707
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brave New World View Post
In Europe and other parts of the world the amount of force used must be reasonable and proportionate and the degree of force used must be the minimum required in the circumstances to achieve the lawful objective, otherwise, it is likely that the use of force will be excessive and unlawful.

In this case other options were available, and not only would this be seen as excessive force in many countries it would also not adhere to Article 2 'The Right to Life' of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Why do American cops kill so many compared to European cops? - The Conversation

Even from a US point of view, the video below posted by somebodyfromnc raises some interesting points in relation to the shooting being absolutely necessary and a last resort.
Brave New World, if you don't agree with how things are done in the United States, then stay in the United Kingdom... Seriously, you guys have your own issues to deal first with before acting superior and sitting in judgement of my country.

Btw, has your British police officers, especially in the London area, stopped that knife/sharpened object crime wave on your own street yet??

It's sad that this woman with mental issues was shot and died of her wounds... But in the United States, our police are not paid to die in the name of political correctness... Especially European/UN political correctness. That officer did what he had to do and he is alive today. And the sad thing is that this officer will have to live with the fact that had to lawfully shoot another human being. I'm sure his loved ones are glad that he's OK and not the one on the ground with a pair of scissors sticking out of his chest. Btw, the body armor worn by most American uniformed officers will not stop knives or other pointed weapon's attacks.

Believe it or not, our cops are not Cowboys looking to shoot people... That cop is going through hell and will most likely spend the rest of his life second guessing himself.

As for the Americans that are critical of the police, they are seriously hiring people since they're in need of officers badly. Not too many people these days what to deal with that type of crap and then be judged on TV. Here in Seattle, new hires get a $10,000.00 sign on bonus and current police officers receive a $15,000.00 cash bonus AND moving expenses for transferring... So here is your chance to make a difference.

Since "Europeans" are so superior to Americans, how do you think this would have been handled in Russia? They would shot her too, but then drive over to her husband's apartment and beat the crap out of him for not controlling his wife.

Also, your European Convention on Rights to Life means nothing here in the United States.

Last edited by bergun; 11-08-2019 at 03:18 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:06 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top