Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Trump still has the capacity to surprise with this unfettered tweeting. Here you have this witness describing how she's been shot at in the service of the country and what do you get from Trump, in a real-time tweet no less while she's testifying:
Everywhere Marie Yovanovitch went turned bad. She started off in Somalia, how did that go? ...
Even ZELENSKY agreed 100% with Trump that Yovanovitch was a “bad ambassador.”
LOL. This is a freak show.
I'm starting to wonder if "Masha" is the actual WhistleBlower. Disgruntled from being fired, cooked up some nutty story about President Trump doing some type of impeachable act.
Either way, it's turned out to be just like most of us figured it was. Bogus!
I'm starting to wonder if Yovanovitch is the actual WhistleBlower. Disgruntled from being fired, cooked up some nutty story about President Trump doing some type of impeachable act.
Either way, it's turned out to be just like most of us figured it was. Bogus!
No, the name of the "Whistleblower" is Eric Ciaramella.
I'm starting to wonder if Yovanovitch is the actual WhistleBlower. Disgruntled from being fired, cooked up some nutty story about President Trump doing some type of impeachable act.
Either way, it's turned out to be just like most of us figured it was. Bogus!
Other than the fact that there have been testimonies from first hand witnesses that corroborate the WB report.
Why are they spending hours of hearings listening to the testimony of a fired, disgruntled employee?
What purpose does anybody think this serves?
We don't agree on much of anything but I think this testimony is useless as well. I keep waiting for something cogent to come up but Schiff isn't persuading me. One point though: her info on corruption was helpful to me to get a bigger picture on Ukraine in general.
I'm starting to wonder if Yovanovitch is the actual WhistleBlower. Disgruntled from being fired, cooked up some nutty story about President Trump doing some type of impeachable act.
Either way, it's turned out to be just like most of us figured it was. Bogus!
A well thought-through analysis, given that she wasn't working for the government at the time of the call, was never a member of the intelligence community, had no "official duties" in July 2019 as set forth in the whistleblower complaint, and could not have received an official "read out" of the July 25 call as the whistleblower did.
So... if look past those fundamental facts that each render your speculation completely impossible, I think you might be on to something here.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
