Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Did I miss the testimony of " Dan Abrams, George Stephonopolus, or the rest of the misfits' bodies on ABC" under oath at the House Impeachment hearings?
You know good and well that Trump has blocked Pompeo, Bolton, Mulvaney, et al. He would have had them all blocked, but some came forward anyway. The Trump and the GOP have no ground to stand on with this one.
Only after the WB info was known and an investigation announced. Releasing the aid after caught doesn't help Trumps defense.
Who knew about the WB's allegations at the time the aid was released? Your version of events doesn't match the timeline.
On September 9th, Atkinson, the inspector general of the intelligence community, notified the House Intelligence Committee that he received a whistleblower’s complaint relating to an “urgent concern” on Aug. 12. He says he found the information credible, and sent “his determination of a credible urgent concern” along with a copy of the complaint to Acting Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire, who had seven days to forward the complaint to Congress. But, contrary to “past practice,” Maguire did not forward the complaint to Congress, believing “the allegations do not meet the definition of an ‘urgent concern’ under the [whistleblower] statute.”
Last edited by InformedConsent; 12-09-2019 at 10:47 AM..
I look at this in a simple way. If someone at the OMB, White House, or other agency had evidence that nothing was wrong. The President would have put them forward already. Trump would not wait 6 months to clear himself, he would have done it immediately in the biggest way possible to embarrass someone, he has yet to do that.
Who knew about the WB's allegations at the time the aid was released? Your version of events doesn't match the timeline.
On September 9th, Atkinson, the inspector general of the intelligence community,*notified*the House Intelligence Committee that he received a whistleblower’s complaint relating to an “urgent concern” on Aug. 12. He says he found the information credible, and sent “his determination of a credible urgent concern” along with a copy of the complaint to Acting Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire, who had seven days to forward the complaint to Congress. But, contrary to “past practice,” Maguire did not forward the complaint to Congress, believing “the allegations do not meet the definition of an ‘urgent concern’ under the [whistleblower] statute.”
Nope. He knew about it in August. And he released the aid within 48 hours of congress being alerted to its existence by the Inspector General for the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.
New polling shows impeachment backfiring on democrats in battle ground states.
Poll shows all democrats candidates for the presidential nomination losing by at least 6 percent in key battle ground states, and the majority of voters in those states do not support impeachment.
A Witness testifies then joins Nadler on the bench to question the other witness.
It's a corrupt hearing.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
