Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So Congress has now effectively confirmed with these proposed articles of impeachment that they have no grounds for accusing Trump of colluding with the Russians to steal the 2016 election from Mrs. Bill Clinton.
If the Democrats and their TDS afflicted mass media have any integrity, they will now apologize to President Trump for bearing false witness against him for three solid years with regards to these false accusations.
Democratic sources say that House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler privately advocated for obstruction of justice as an article of impeachment, which would have included evidence from special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation.
As CNN reported this afternoon, there were multiple individuals, including committee chairs and members of Democratic leadership, who also agreed with a separate article of impeachment.
No, you don't impeach a president because you don't like him or don't like the outcome of the election. For you to think that is the case shows how much you haven't been paying attention.
Exactly, but that is all they have and they are sticking to it.
Now that that farce is over it’s time to get back to business - socialism, open borders, class warfare, higher taxes, demonizing working class Americans . . . .
Offering them one scoop of ice cream while having two himself is "impeachable" because literally anything can be if they have the votes, what is in question is a legal matter.
Would it be obstruction if he refused the Senate? No, but they'd have a case to take to SCOTUS in an effort to override the president. If he still refused after SCOTUS rules, then it would be obstruction.
If not "blanket privilege" then what is the legal basis or justification for instructing the entire Executive Branch to defy Congressional subpoenas?
Executive privilege applies, the "blanket privilege" you keep talking about is only applicable if Trump were suggesting that executive privilege could not be overridden. SCOTUS has ruled that it absolutely can be overruled by the judiciary under certain circumstances.... but Democrats didn't even attempt to do that, so there's no point in talking about it.
Thank you, America for voting for Democrats to take the House. Democrats are doing what we elected them to do. Hold this president accountable. Thank you GOP senators with integrity for retiring and resigning in record numbers. Democrats will turn out in record numbers in 2020.
And thank you for securing Trump a second term. :-)
And thank you for securing Trump a second term. :-)
Kay Ann didn't secure him another term. But people who couldn't care less that Trump abuses is power and tries to act like a king may do that. Especially since the GOP couldn't care less either and refuses to uphold their own oaths of office.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
/sarcasm