Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Flynn suing the FBI and Page suing the DNC. The Deep State is full of crooks.
They are one in the same, agreed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by fnh
Er, the dossier was commissioned and paid for >50% by the Republicans...
Er...
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow
Nope. It was marketed to Jeb and McCain, by Fushion GPS. It had already been played with the same players in 2007, against John McCain and Bush shut it down.
This...
Quote:
Originally Posted by stburr91
That's not true, all the Russian collusion stuff was created for Hillary, and the DNC.
... and that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by phma
Debunked !!!
Try again !!!
... and that...
Quote:
Originally Posted by phma
Debunked !!!
DNC and Hill Dog paid C.S. to produce the dossier and he was the author !!! Pay attention !!!
...and that... This guy just don't get it. Must be a CNN worshipper.
Read it, it is the dossier with the same players, just inserting names relevant to Trumps campaign.
They used this same exact script on McCain.
So, the way McCain and Romney were done, how could they be so sleazeball to try and push this off on President Donald J Trump? That's pretty filthy imo, ymmv, yada yada and stuff.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow
Steel didn't write the dossier. Glenn Simpson did in 2007 for the WSJ.
They needed Steele's name for cred. to get the IC to bite. That is why when questioned, Steele didn't know much about what was in the dossier.
Easy now. That's not the story the Blamestream Lamestream Fakestream Mainstream media wants to portray.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FC76-81
I remember when Obama claimed that he had the American people being spied on by NSA and his excuse was: "it was done for the safety of Americans". And when he said that, I was thinking if Nixon were alive today, he would have said to that: "Why didn't I think of that?"
Because back then, folks weren't as stupid as the morons we got walkin around today.
Quote:
Originally Posted by golgi1
Your programming is broken. You are typing in broken English instead of your Russian mother language.
Don't worry, as your time has passed. The democracy undermining disinformation dossier invented by your Kremlin and adopted by our local communists has failed.
True.
Quote:
Originally Posted by fnh
The New York Times is one of the most respected news outlets in the world.
Well I see where you're coming from, I'm just going to head a different direction.
They did find Russian collusion and evidence of obstruction. Indictable crimes uncovered that would be charged but for a DOJ policy memo about a sitting president. Already 37 indictments and convictions of trump associates stemming from Mueller's investigation. The lie is that they didn't because they definitely did, you just keep shifting that turd around in your mouth.
Nope, not true. Mueller did testify to Congress that trump was explicitly not exonerated.
Republicans speaking on the obstruction revealed by the Mueller report:
[youtube]bwnMpneFR34/youtube]
[url]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwnMpneFR34/url]
Here is the Mueller report again, you clearly haven't read it: [url]https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/04/18/us/politics/mueller-report-document.html/url]
And what was the Mueller Report again? Hoax number two or three?
Mueller was asked by Rep. Ted Lieu, a Democrat, about a Justice Department rule that a sitting president cannot be indicted, based on a 2000 memo from the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC). Lieu asked Mueller to confirm that “the reason, again, that you did not indict Donald Trump is because of an OLC opinion stating that you cannot indict a sitting president, correct?” Mueller initially answered, “That is correct.”
Mueller, also in testimony to Congress:
“It is not a witch hunt,” Mueller replied.
“When the president said the Russian interference was a hoax, that was false, wasn’t it?”
“True,” Mueller said.
Later, Rep. Jackie Speier asked a similar question: “Would you agree that it’s not a hoax that the Russians were engaged in trying to impact our election?”
“Absolutely,” Mueller replied. “That was not a hoax.”
Video of Mueller stating explicitly that from the outset the investigation was shaped by the DOJ policy memo regarding sitting presidents:
You guys always leave out the facts.
Mueller stated under oath that the DOJ policy was not why he didn't charge obstruction.
In Mueller's opening statement that came later before the House Intelligence Committee, the former special counsel said he wanted to "correct the record" on his exchange with Lieu.
"That's not the correct way to say it," Mueller said. "We did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime."
In early May, Attorney General William Barr testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee that Mueller "reiterated several times in a group meeting that he was not saying that but for the OLC opinion he would have found obstruction."
Ha, Barr saying it certainly doesn't make it true. Republican prosecutors and former AGs came out and spoke against him. The consensus position, including Mueller's as stated, is that since the current memo policy is that a sitting president is unindictable, the investigators would not make the determination. The Mueller report explicitly states it does not conclude the president did not commit a crime. Ergo... If you have to argue the double negative, then acknowledge your client is hiding behind a technicality.
Read the Mueller report yourself, I still think you haven't. It's fair to assume you don't read much that doesn't have pictures, so I get that it's a challenge. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...-document.html
The fact is, there were plenty of instances outlined to demonstrate collusion AND obstruction. What they didn't establish was a direct link from trump himself to prove conspiracy, but of course your syphilitic snowflake trump was too skeered to answer questions under oath.
The New York Times is one of the most respected news outlets in the world. It isn't cheap but a subscription gives you access to fact-checked news and information. You should try it sometime.
Even the Wall Street Journal has outlined details on trump's corrupt business dealings with Russian mafiosos.
"The New York Times is one of the most respected news outlets in the world."
Correction, WAS. You do know they have a new owner, don't you?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
