Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-31-2020, 12:02 PM
 
Location: El paso,tx
4,514 posts, read 2,523,760 times
Reputation: 8200

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Myghost View Post
Has nothing to do with that. It's about arresting people (not sure I agree with that either) who break the law.

Fact is, Rand broke the law, there are laws in place to protect whistleblowers in the workforce. He should be held accountable. I don't know if he should be arrested, but held accountable.

I know one thing: If Trump doesn't have this guy murdered, then he'll have a much better chance of suing Rand in a civil suit than Tulsi ever dreamed of suing Hillary for sharing the OPINION that she's a Russian Asset (she didn't call her an agent, just an asset. Something that benefits them.)
Show the law that states a whistleblowers name can't be mentioned. There isnt one. The law protects them from retaliation on the job.
Plus RP didnt say ", eric C, whistleblower". It was just one other name, and since the whistleblower hasnt been identified, no one would lnow he is the whistleblower.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-31-2020, 12:04 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,026 posts, read 44,840,107 times
Reputation: 13714
Quote:
Originally Posted by Myghost View Post
Has nothing to do with that. It's about arresting people (not sure I agree with that either) who break the law.

Fact is, Rand broke the law, there are laws in place to protect whistleblowers in the workforce.
There is no guarantee of a whistleblower's anonymity in the law, only protection against employer retribution.

Why are so many so under-informed? Where's the false info coming from? Are Schiff and the Dems lying to you all, again?!? Or what?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2020, 12:48 PM
 
15,531 posts, read 10,504,683 times
Reputation: 15812
I didn't hear Rand name him, however we all know it's Eric Ciaramella.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2020, 01:07 PM
 
8,957 posts, read 2,558,130 times
Reputation: 4725
Quote:
Originally Posted by Myghost View Post
Fact is, Rand broke the law, there are laws in place to protect whistleblowers in the workforce. He should be held accountable. I don't know if he should be arrested, but held accountable.
That is, in fact, a lie. Did you lie out of ignorance or was it malicious?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2020, 01:13 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,026 posts, read 44,840,107 times
Reputation: 13714
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbythegreat View Post
That is, in fact, a lie. Did you lie out of ignorance or was it malicious?
It could have just been blind gullibility. Perhaps that poster believed Schiff's and the Dems' lies about it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2020, 01:21 PM
 
Location: Texas
37,949 posts, read 17,870,209 times
Reputation: 10371
Quote:
Originally Posted by Myghost View Post
Has nothing to do with that. It's about arresting people (not sure I agree with that either) who break the law.

Fact is, Rand broke the law, there are laws in place to protect whistleblowers in the workforce. He should be held accountable. I don't know if he should be arrested, but held accountable.
Fact is, no he didn't. Go ahead and the name the Law Rand broke. I bet you wont even try.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Myghost View Post
I know one thing: If Trump doesn't have this guy murdered, then he'll have a much better chance of suing Rand in a civil suit than Tulsi ever dreamed of suing Hillary for sharing the OPINION that she's a Russian Asset (she didn't call her an agent, just an asset. Something that benefits them.)
Sue Rand for what? Telling the truth when he specifically said, "Are you aware that House Intelligence Committee staffer Sean Misko had a close relationship with Eric Ciaramella when at the National Security Council together?" Paul said. "Are you aware and how do you respond to reports that Ciaramella and Misko may have worked together to plot impeaching the president before there were formal House impeachment proceedings?"

And that's the fact.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2020, 01:22 PM
 
Location: Del Rio, TN
39,870 posts, read 26,514,597 times
Reputation: 25773
Quote:
Originally Posted by tamajane View Post
What law did he break?
He hurt Democrats feelings.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2020, 01:25 PM
 
Location: Del Rio, TN
39,870 posts, read 26,514,597 times
Reputation: 25773
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
Fact is, no he didn't. Go ahead and the name the Law Rand broke. I bet you wont even try.


Sue Rand for what? Telling the truth when he specifically said, "Are you aware that House Intelligence Committee staffer Sean Misko had a close relationship with Eric when at the National Security Council together?" Paul said. "Are you aware and how do you respond to reports that Ciaramella and Misko may have worked together to plot impeaching the president before there were formal House impeachment proceedings?"

And that's the fact.
The Dems faux outrage over Paul "outing" Ciaramella is just another lame attempt to deflect on the point you made-that Ciaramella was a close associate of powerful Dems and a long-time TDSer. As far as "outing"-he was outed on social media months ago-they look ignorant and foolish trying to blame it on Paul. But, looking ignorant and foolish is sort of a thing for the left these days.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2020, 01:27 PM
 
Location: Texas
37,949 posts, read 17,870,209 times
Reputation: 10371
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toyman at Jewel Lake View Post
The Dems faux outrage over Paul "outing" Ciaramella is just another lame attempt to deflect on the point you made-that Ciaramella was a close associate of powerful Dems and a long-time TDSer. As far as "outing"-he was outed on social media months ago-they look ignorant and foolish trying to blame it on Paul. But, looking ignorant and foolish is sort of a thing for the left these days.
Agreed. They are absolutely disgusting human beings. There used to be a handful of decent democrats but I don't think there are any left. Not that the repubs are the bees knees.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2020, 01:31 PM
 
Location: Texas
9,189 posts, read 7,601,522 times
Reputation: 7801
Maybe his other neighbor will give him another beatdown. (just joking folks)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:23 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top