Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If you read even the redacted report, there is plenty of collusion outlined in it. Just not criminal conspiracy. It directly cites obstruction as well.
But go ahead, keep believing Trump's no collusion no obstruction lie.
The question here is about if Barr redacted things inappropriately. And given the redactions weve seen to hide things, its probable that he did, in which case this judge may allow us to see a ton of interesting things that were hidden from us.
They may as well release everything because a future Democratic president certainly will. We will learn all the things the GOP is hiding from Ukraine to Russia to the Middle East. It will all come out and not only will Trump be exposed, so will every member of his administration and ever Republican in Congress that has worked so hard to keep Trump's secrets.
A judge can't force grand jury testimony to be revealed. They also cannot declassify documents or portions of documents. So this judge's order is meaningless.
A judge can't force grand jury testimony to be revealed. They also cannot declassify documents or portions of documents. So this judge's order is meaningless.
It almost sounds like you're in favor of withholding the truth from the people.
BTW - There is no way you are biased, referring to the president as Cheeto Jesus, right?
`
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.