Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 03-06-2020, 06:30 AM
 
2,324 posts, read 2,908,364 times
Reputation: 1785

Advertisements

Sounds like you should hurry up and again Impeach


 
Old 03-06-2020, 07:36 AM
 
9,254 posts, read 3,590,300 times
Reputation: 4852
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
AKA the core value of the current dems in congress, exemplified by the House's refusal to call witnesses and seek the truth during the impeachment trial when they had the chance.
What refusal to call witnesses are you talking about? They called several witnesses but their subpoenas were ignored at Trump's direction.
 
Old 03-06-2020, 07:41 AM
 
11,404 posts, read 4,089,994 times
Reputation: 7852
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnBoy64 View Post
Nope...just stating facts here
Trump supporters don't do well with facts.

Much like Donald Trump himself, whenever somebody criticizes or disagrees with Donald Trump about anything, City-Data Trump voters immediately begin to insult and attack people. You know, versus holding fact-based conversations and civil discord. Nah, Trump supporters go straight to name-calling.

Per usual, if Trump did absolutely nothing wrong, an independent review of the report should not concern Trump or his C-D supporters whatsoever.
 
Old 03-06-2020, 07:46 AM
 
18,561 posts, read 7,382,872 times
Reputation: 11382
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnBoy64 View Post
Looks like Barr is going to get slapped around a bit. This is highly unusual. Of course everything has been highly unusual since we've had Cheeto Jesus.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...judge-s-review

No comment from Barr.
I don't get it. This is utterly ordinary. There's a FOIA-like request. The law says the judge has to adjudicate the complaint. Sure, the judge appears to be a partisan hack, but that doesn't make this newsworthy.
 
Old 03-06-2020, 07:54 AM
 
18,561 posts, read 7,382,872 times
Reputation: 11382
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
That is fairly laughable, hopefully you have more than the MSM is unfair. The judge reviewed the redacted portion of the Mueller report because of a Freedom of Information Act request and found Barr's rapid response with his version to be partisan.
That's a lie. He hasn't found anything.
 
Old 03-06-2020, 08:00 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles
7,826 posts, read 2,730,782 times
Reputation: 3387
Quote:
Originally Posted by hbdwihdh378y9 View Post
I don't get it. This is utterly ordinary. There's a FOIA-like request. The law says the judge has to adjudicate the complaint. Sure, the judge appears to be a partisan hack, but that doesn't make this newsworthy.
It sure made the news though didn't it, including conservative media

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...arr-over-muel/

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fed...dacted-version
 
Old 03-06-2020, 08:47 AM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,500,230 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnBoy64 View Post
Looks like Barr is going to get slapped around a bit. This is highly unusual. Of course everything has been highly unusual since we've had Cheeto Jesus.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...judge-s-review





No comment from Barr.


uhm.. that judge has zero jurisdiction for that
 
Old 03-06-2020, 09:01 AM
 
59,111 posts, read 27,349,464 times
Reputation: 14290
Quote:
Originally Posted by Conqueso View Post
They called several witnesses . The ones with firsthand knowledge, Your president blocked them from testifying .
"The ones with firsthand knowledge," and which ones were that?
 
Old 03-06-2020, 09:03 AM
 
59,111 posts, read 27,349,464 times
Reputation: 14290
Quote:
Originally Posted by TEPLimey View Post
What refusal to call witnesses are you talking about? They called several witnesses but their subpoenas were ignored at Trump's direction.
If they truly wanted hem they could have gone to court like everybody else does.

That IS the normal process you know.
 
Old 03-06-2020, 09:11 AM
 
9,254 posts, read 3,590,300 times
Reputation: 4852
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
If they truly wanted hem they could have gone to court like everybody else does.

That IS the normal process you know.
I guess you haven't been paying attention to the news. The DC Circuit ruled last week that the House cannot go to court to enforce a subpoena against the Executive Branch. So, no, they could not have "gone to court like everybody else does".

Last edited by TEPLimey; 03-06-2020 at 09:31 AM..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top