Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: The DOJ/FBI/CIA should not be blindly trusted to oversee themselves with regards to FISA matters any
Agree 27 96.43%
Disagree 1 3.57%
Voters: 28. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-05-2020, 06:38 AM
 
Location: East Lansing, MI
28,353 posts, read 16,385,616 times
Reputation: 10467

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by atltechdude View Post
Well clearly it should be, but historically it has been more of a rubber stamp of approval on whatever they were handed.
Well since the FISC is the oversight of the FBI, the OP's poll is nonsensical...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-05-2020, 07:15 AM
 
11,186 posts, read 6,508,677 times
Reputation: 4622
Quote:
Originally Posted by hooligan View Post
Well since the FISC is the oversight of the FBI, the OP's poll is nonsensical...

The FISC is NOT the oversight of the FBI. It simply reviews the applications.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2020, 07:33 AM
 
Location: East Lansing, MI
28,353 posts, read 16,385,616 times
Reputation: 10467
Quote:
Originally Posted by jazzarama View Post
The FISC is NOT the oversight of the FBI. It simply reviews the applications.
Reviews the applications for......?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2020, 07:40 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,028 posts, read 44,840,107 times
Reputation: 13714
Quote:
Originally Posted by hooligan View Post
Well since the FISC is the oversight of the FBI, the OP's poll is nonsensical...
Nope. The Litigation Section of the NSD reviews and prepares requests for Attorney General authorization to use FISA information in criminal and non-criminal proceedings.

https://www.justice.gov/nsd/national...nization-chart

Atkinson was a key player in the systemic FISA abuse. The head of the NSD when the FISA abuse took place was Assistant Attorney General Mary McCord. Atkinson was McCord's senior counsel. It all passed through him.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2020, 07:52 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,298 posts, read 26,217,746 times
Reputation: 15646
The Patriot Act should have sunset in 2005 but here we are 15 years later, there is little value and tremendous cost.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2020, 07:53 AM
 
5,731 posts, read 2,194,294 times
Reputation: 3877
The feds are corrupt, abuse their power and play dirty, who would of guessed it
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2020, 08:05 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,298 posts, read 26,217,746 times
Reputation: 15646
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Nope. The Litigation Section of the NSD reviews and prepares requests for Attorney General authorization to use FISA information in criminal and non-criminal proceedings.

https://www.justice.gov/nsd/national...nization-chart

Atkinson was a key player in the systemic FISA abuse. The head of the NSD when the FISA abuse took place was Assistant Attorney General Mary McCord. Atkinson was McCord's senior counsel. It all passed through him.
Barr is the godfather of the Patriot Act, he helped the phone companies hand over bulk records of phone calls back in 1992, he also served at chief counsel at Verizon allowing the federal government access to US citizens. But here you are pointing out Atkinson since he signed off on some FISA applications.


This isn't partisan, both parties have a hand in this stupid "war on terror".


Barr will be the one arguing in the senate to continue the Patriot Act in some modified form, he is not the hero people make him out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2020, 08:10 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,028 posts, read 44,840,107 times
Reputation: 13714
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Barr is the godfather of the Patriot Act, he helped the phone companies hand over bulk records of phone calls back in 1992, he also served at chief counsel at Verizon allowing the federal government access to US citizens. But here you are pointing out Atkinson since he signed off on some FISA applications.

This isn't partisan, both parties have a hand in this stupid "war on terror".

Barr will be the one arguing in the senate to continue the Patriot Act in some modified form, he is not the hero people make him out.
What does any of that have to do with Atkinson passing along ALL of the blatant FISA abuse as McCord's NSD senior counsel? Again, FYI, the Litigation Section of the NSD reviews and prepares requests for Attorney General authorization to use FISA information.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2020, 09:05 AM
 
19,573 posts, read 8,522,211 times
Reputation: 10096
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Barr is the godfather of the Patriot Act, he helped the phone companies hand over bulk records of phone calls back in 1992, he also served at chief counsel at Verizon allowing the federal government access to US citizens. But here you are pointing out Atkinson since he signed off on some FISA applications.

This isn't partisan, both parties have a hand in this stupid "war on terror".

Barr will be the one arguing in the senate to continue the Patriot Act in some modified form, he is not the hero people make him out.
Anytime there is an opportunity to make our country less safe or to side with the self proclaimed enemies, Democrat leftists are right there to celebrate and promote that. It is really remarkable in an especially creepy and dirty sort of way the consistent sympathy that people like you display towards murdering terrorists and people who are openly working to bring us down and cause us harm. Of course you guys have been doing this for many years now.

The Patriot Act has its flaws, that is for certain. I started this thread to emphasize that point. But after we were attacked on 9/11 and thousands of innocent Americans were brutally murdered as a result of a terrorist conspiracy carried out here on American soil, it was no longer possible for any patriotic American to stick their heads in the sand and pretend that organized international terrorism was something that we were not threatened by, under attack from or that we could ignore.

Of course when I refer to patriotic Americans, I am certainly not referring to you or those people who think and act like you.

The war on terror was and is necessary. We have terrorist enemies that are trying to destroy us. The Patriot Act, flawed though it is, was designed to provide some tools to help defend us from these threats. In the case of the FISA provisions, these are information gathering tools.

We still need to be able to gather the information that the FISA provisions of the Patriot Act were designed to procure. However, we also need to protect the constitutional rights of Americans while we are doing this. There is no reason why we should not be able to do both.

After the blatant abuse and obvious corruption of these processes and procedures with regards to the unlawful surveillance of President Trump's campaign and also apparently in many other FISA warrant application cases, there now FINALLY appears to be support for the reforming the provisions of this law. That will not mean doing away with the ability to get surveillance warrants on the enemies of our country.

Hopefully that will mean this will be done in a much more accountable way, which recognizes that there are no experts or authorities that can or should be blindly trusted, without appropriate oversight and accountability. That is true regardless of whether we are talking about the heads of the DOJ, the FBI, our national security services, the head of the CDC, the National Institute of Health, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) or anyone else.

No longer can or should these people be blindly trusted. Not anymore.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2020, 09:08 AM
 
45,676 posts, read 24,018,755 times
Reputation: 15559
You would think this would have been one of the first things this administration would have addressed if it was so unlawful, so wrong, blah blah blah.

THree years in and still waiting right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:11 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top