Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The longer these idiot blue governors play their stupid games the less likely they are to be re-elected. So I’m fine with the idiots digging their own graves.
Our governors have no guidance by the president in dealing with a global pandemic. They are doing the best they can to keep their state safe. None of them are idiots. They just have no idea what to do. If states open up too soon it will only get worse. If they don't open their economy suffers. Where is the leadership from the president. Why is this pandemic left up to governors.
Our governors have no guidance by the president in dealing with a global pandemic. They are doing the best they can to keep their state safe. None of them are idiots. They just have no idea what to do. If states open up too soon it will only get worse. If they don't open their economy suffers. Where is the leadership from the president. Why is this pandemic left up to governors.
Because, as so many on the left and the media insisted on pointing out when when he claimed that only he had the power to determine when to "open up"-he has no such authority and it is indeed actually the lawful responsibility of state governors. Trump has given his guidance-open up. The federal guidelines for "lockdown" ended on May 1st.
Our governors have no guidance by the president in dealing with a global pandemic. They are doing the best they can to keep their state safe. None of them are idiots. They just have no idea what to do. If states open up too soon it will only get worse. If they don't open their economy suffers. Where is the leadership from the president. Why is this pandemic left up to governors.
And somehow POTUS does? And POTUS can magically know what is best for every given state, the distinction of which has been brutally but candidly brought to the fore by CV19? You would rather POTUS take the least affected state and give a single edict? You would rather POTUS take the most affected state and give a single edict? Bottom line is that if POTUS has access to better experts, then this information should be disseminated, but actual LAW and DIRECTIVES should 100% be allocated to the states, and in many cases, to specific municipalities within states (e.g. what works for Los Angeles isn't necessarily meaningful to Redding). Honestly, you really want "one size fits all, reality be damned" laws to come from the top?
And to be clear, if there is a governor that "just have not idea what to do", then they have no right controlling the well being of an entire state.
Because, as so many on the left and the media insisted on pointing out when when he claimed that only he had the power to determine when to "open up"-he has no such authority and it is indeed actually the lawful responsibility of state governors. Trump has given his guidance-open up. The federal guidelines for "lockdown" ended on May 1st.
This shouldn't be about the left or right. This should be about mankind. This virus is affecting all of our country and the world. We need to be united not divided. Trump has made this so political though.
This shouldn't be about the left or right. This should be about mankind. This virus is affecting all of our country and the world. We need to be united not divided. Trump has made this so political though.
Yes, we're all in this together. I'm so tired of all the partisan sniping.
This shouldn't be about the left or right. This should be about mankind. This virus is affecting all of our country and the world. We need to be united not divided. Trump has made this so political though.
Trump is not only making it political, so are the media and various governors (especially Whitmer of Michigan) are as well.
And somehow POTUS does? And POTUS can magically know what is best for every given state, the distinction of which has been brutally but candidly brought to the fore by CV19? You would rather POTUS take the least affected state and give a single edict? You would rather POTUS take the most affected state and give a single edict? Bottom line is that if POTUS has access to better experts, then this information should be disseminated, but actual LAW and DIRECTIVES should 100% be allocated to the states, and in many cases, to specific municipalities within states (e.g. what works for Los Angeles isn't necessarily meaningful to Redding). Honestly, you really want "one size fits all, reality be damned" laws to come from the top?
And to be clear, if there is a governor that "just have not idea what to do", then they have no right controlling the well being of an entire state.
Thank you. You are describing Trump perfectly! Just switch out the word governor for president.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
