Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-13-2020, 11:10 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,230 posts, read 26,172,300 times
Reputation: 15620

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by hbdwihdh378y9 View Post
Interestingly, the precedent people keep talking about is the case of Senator Ted Stevens of Alaska. Robert Mueller announced that Stevens had committed a crime right before the election, and because of Mueller's election interference Stevens's opponent won. (Ultimately, this may have made the difference in the passage of Obamacare.) Mueller railroaded Stevens and convicted him a week before election day in 2008. Then when the Obama administration took over a few months later, Eric Holder dismissed the case despite the conviction.

Pretty clear that there was a good reason for dropping the conviction, not the case here.


Quote:
Mr. Holder announced this week that he would ask a judge to drop all charges against Mr. Stevens, a Republican, because of prosecutorial misconduct. Mr. Holder should ensure that the Justice Department gets to the bottom of what went wrong and subject other cases that have raised red flags to similar scrutiny.
Mr. Stevens was convicted of making false statements on Senate disclosure forms to hide an estimated $250,000 in home renovations and gifts, many from Bill Allen, an old friend with close ties to his state’s oil industry. The Justice Department says that prosecutors failed to turn over to the defense notes from an interview with Mr. Allen, a prime witness in the case, which conflicted with parts of his trial testimony.


Prosecutors are legally required to turn over evidence in their possession that would help a defendant prove his innocence. This revelation is only the latest in a series of instances in which Mr. Stevens’s prosecutors appear to have acted wrongly.



https://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/03/opinion/03fri3.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-13-2020, 11:17 AM
 
18,557 posts, read 7,362,427 times
Reputation: 11372
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Pretty clear that there was a good reason for dropping the conviction, not the case here.

https://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/03/opinion/03fri3.html
This case involves what that case involved -- plus so much more!

The DOJ never turned over the notes of their interview with Flynn.

And there's too much other stuff they withheld for me to even start on it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2020, 11:37 AM
 
20,758 posts, read 8,562,401 times
Reputation: 14393
Quote:
Originally Posted by hbdwihdh378y9 View Post
This case involves what that case involved -- plus so much more!
The DOJ never turned over the notes of their interview with Flynn.And there's too much other stuff they withheld for me to even start on it.
Sounds like you have secret information. Please share since you are obviously an insider.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2020, 12:05 PM
 
9,617 posts, read 6,060,434 times
Reputation: 3884
Didn't notice the courageous outrage. Or, was that outrageous courage?

Was focused on the number of confirmations and action pendings. Strong. FDR-like in terms of changing the make up of the Article III judiciary.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
"Just to address 2 of your courageous claims.

A correction, I meant to say OUTRAGEOUS claims. Sorry for the typo.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2020, 12:16 PM
 
7,520 posts, read 2,806,221 times
Reputation: 3941
Love the Babylon Bee's take on Comey

https://babylonbee.com/news/comey-we...ampaign=buffer


Quote:
"We did not spy," he told reporters as he stretched for his morning yoga class. "We just observed and reported secretly without the subject's knowledge or consent."

"See, I've never considered that spying," he added as he formed the "downward dog" pose. "That's just kind of secret watching. It's definitely not the same thing. When you spy, you watch someone without their knowledge. When you secret-watch, you just kind of secretly watch them."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2020, 12:36 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,230 posts, read 26,172,300 times
Reputation: 15620
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferd View Post
Flynn was a MILLIONAIR!!!!




Flynn was a career public servant who had a retirement plan. not exactly a super rich business class guy.


NOW Flynn is broke because Obama and his scumteam broke him.


What is clear is there was zero reason for the FBI to do the interview where they decided he lied....AFTER they decided he didn't lie.


No underlying crime. No predicate for investigation. Just a chance to hang a guy that Obama wanted hung.


In the end, his high paid lawyers got him screwed. then he got a lawyer who did the real work for nothing.


what makes me sad is you are defending this action by the political players who went after a guy with no underlying criminal act.
Flynn was a millionaire from his lobbying work for Turkey and other countries, his speaking engagements for the Russian Times and his pension as a 3 star general. Proper representation was never the issue.


Yes he finally got good representation, William Barr.

Last edited by Goodnight; 05-13-2020 at 12:46 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2020, 12:37 PM
 
18,557 posts, read 7,362,427 times
Reputation: 11372
Quote:
Originally Posted by PilgrimsProgress View Post
Sounds like you have secret information. Please share since you are obviously an insider.
It's all public, and most of it has been talked about extensively in the past week all over the Internet.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2020, 12:43 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,230 posts, read 26,172,300 times
Reputation: 15620
Quote:
Originally Posted by hbdwihdh378y9 View Post
This case involves what that case involved -- plus so much more!

The DOJ never turned over the notes of their interview with Flynn.

And there's too much other stuff they withheld for me to even start on it.
Nonsense, that was not indicated in Barr's memo dropping the charges.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2020, 12:56 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,596,242 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Nonsense, that was not indicated in Barr's memo dropping the charges.
Just a reminder, the last time the Lawfare types filed an outraged amicus brief with a court...



...it was with the FISA Court, trying to claim that Nunes memo was false for claiming FISA abuse.



Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2020, 01:05 PM
 
Location: Washington, DC
4,178 posts, read 2,646,247 times
Reputation: 3659
Um....this is kinda a big deal.

https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1260646308941123584
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top