CBS News Report: Pizza Gate Might Be Real (POLL) (Clinton, party, examples)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The idiot who checked it out and shot up the store came from my county.
It is not real and never has been.
The lunatic parts of our country seem to need to keep pushing this lie.
To be accurate, there is no direct proof that the two pizza parlors were involved in pedophilia activities.
But there is evidence showing that John Podesta is likely involved in pedophilia, including using coded pedophile language in numerous emails, and owning numerous works of art/photographs that depict naked children & teenagers, some in suggestive positions, e.g. children duck taped or tied up. FYI, this is the same type of artwork that criminal investigators discovered inside of Jeff Epstein's Palm Beach home in Florida.
Watch the Netflix documentary on Jeff Epstein, it's pretty revealing and shows the kind of crap that these pedophiles are into.
Status:
"I don't understand. But I don't care, so it works out."
(set 1 day ago)
35,583 posts, read 17,927,273 times
Reputation: 50620
That was interesting to watch, but kind of "dead in the water" because he admits he can't share the meatiest evidence he uncovered due to it being inappropriate for TV. He has images that would be too disturbing, and also can't even describe it in vague terms because it is so inappropriate.
We all know, through MSM, EXACTLY what Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky did. I don't believe he can't give us a skeleton outline of the information he uncovered.
There is so much emphasis placed on allegations of abuse and misconduct towards women, and cries of every woman should be taken seriously, and investigated.
Where's the same concern for those that are most vulnerable, and have no voice whatsoever? This should be investigated carefully and fully, as there is some actual evidence.
That was interesting to watch, but kind of "dead in the water" because he admits he can't share the meatiest evidence he uncovered due to it being inappropriate for TV. He has images that would be too disturbing, and also can't even describe it in vague terms because it is so inappropriate.
I've seen the pictures of John Podesta's art collection, many examples of nude or half naked children.
I remember one disturbing painting depicts little boys in their underwear with their hands tied behind their backs. I won't post any examples on here because it would result in a ban.
Normal people DO NOT own artwork like that.
If I was invited to a neighbor's house and saw artwork that depicted children in such a manner, I would report them to the police.
You can do a google search for John Podesta's art work.
The realtor found a handkerchief (I think it has a map that seems pizza-related. Is it yorus? They can send it if you want. I know you're busy, so feel free not to respond if it's not yours or you don't want it.
Why would someone have a "pizza-related" map drawn on a handkerchief? What does that mean? Why would anyone think a handkerchief was important enough to spend time and money to send to someone?
Perhaps there's an honest, simple answer. Interesting that NOBODY in the mainstream/legacy media EVER tried to find out, though, isn't it?
Location: 23.7 million to 162 million miles North of Venus
23,451 posts, read 12,487,658 times
Reputation: 10435
I don't know if it's true or not, since it was never investigated by the authorities. All we know is that Podesta and his Dem pals denied it and that is all the 'proof' some people seem to need...party over innocent children.
Quote:
Originally Posted by saltine
Too many big shots involved. Kids have no voice.
Amazing that some people just don't care.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ClaraC
That was interesting to watch, but kind of "dead in the water" because he admits he can't share the meatiest evidence he uncovered due to it being inappropriate for TV. He has images that would be too disturbing, and also can't even describe it in vague terms because it is so inappropriate.
We all know, through MSM, EXACTLY what Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky did. I don't believe he can't give us a skeleton outline of the information he uncovered.
It would be considered porn, child porn at that. Images cannot be shown on tv or on youtube. Since it deals with children they probably cannot even talk about what is in those images.
Podesta has a very distinct voice.
There is a youtube video that I will not link to because of the TOS, but feel free to look it up .. just search for - John Podesta call me your father youtube. The video is very dark, just a light from a flashlight or something in the video. There is another video regarding that one which does a voice match to Podesta.
excerpt from the video...
""you think you're hot s*** dontcha!? You think you're hot .. listen up! What's my name!?"
"John"
"What's my name!?"
"Skippy"
"My other name, what do you call me!?"
"Dad"
"I am your father.! From now on you will call me your father! Shut up!""
Terrified child screaming and crying and slapping noises throughout video
The rest of the video is even more bizarre.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
