Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Pardon Officer Garrett Rolfe if Convicted?
Yes 86 70.49%
No 36 29.51%
Voters: 122. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-23-2020, 10:57 PM
 
Location: Various
9,049 posts, read 3,525,554 times
Reputation: 5470

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by ohioaninsc View Post
A taser, which is not a deadly weapon should not require deadly force in retaliation.
The DA disagrees with you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-23-2020, 10:59 PM
 
Location: Various
9,049 posts, read 3,525,554 times
Reputation: 5470
Quote:
Originally Posted by kokonutty View Post
The decent police officer who disregarded his training, ignored regulations and shot a fleeing man in the back, rejoiced, kicked the victim while he bled out and withheld medical attention for two minutes and twelve seconds? That "decent American police officer?"
Assessing evidence and critical reasoning is really not a strength of yours is it. You sound like the lawyer of the dead felon.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2020, 12:21 AM
 
11,025 posts, read 7,845,423 times
Reputation: 23702
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlakeJones View Post
As has been pointed out repeatedly, officer Garrett Rolfe was following his training when he defended himself upon being assaulted and threatened with his stolen taser. But then again I think you know that, and you're looking forward to some free sneakers and more store burnings when he is ultimately fully acquitted on all charges
Rolfe's training required him to inform a suspect that he was under arrest before handcuffing him; he did not.
The "stolen Taser," (Brosnan's, not Rolfe's) was no more than an inert piece of plastic when Rolfe gunned down his victim, contrary to his training, regulations and the law. Do we need to discuss his kicking of a dying man and withholding medical aid? How about shooting towards and endangering a group of people and vehicles?

Your reference to me in regard to looting and arson is a ridiculous, ignorant personal attack that is in violation of the terms of service here; enjoy your time off.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2020, 12:24 AM
 
11,025 posts, read 7,845,423 times
Reputation: 23702
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aussiehoff View Post
Assessing evidence and critical reasoning is really not a strength of yours is it. You sound like the lawyer of the dead felon.
Because lawyers deal with facts and the facts here are damning.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2020, 12:26 AM
 
Location: USA
31,077 posts, read 22,094,503 times
Reputation: 19100
Quote:
Originally Posted by mtl1 View Post
So we administer justice in accordance to what mobs and rioters want? What message does that send?
Yes, that is the way Democrats run their cities. When a mob shows up, they change their policy to appease the mob
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2020, 01:30 AM
 
21,109 posts, read 13,571,675 times
Reputation: 19723
Quote:
Originally Posted by kokonutty View Post
Rolfe's training required him to inform a suspect that he was under arrest before handcuffing him; he did not.
The "stolen Taser," (Brosnan's, not Rolfe's) was no more than an inert piece of plastic when Rolfe gunned down his victim, contrary to his training, regulations and the law. Do we need to discuss his kicking of a dying man and withholding medical aid? How about shooting towards and endangering a group of people and vehicles?

Your reference to me in regard to looting and arson is a ridiculous, ignorant personal attack that is in violation of the terms of service here; enjoy your time off.
I heard him telling the guy he was under arrest. He began with 'you've had too much to drink'.

A jury will acquit, this entire topic is meaningless.

I'm not saying whether they should or should not, only that they will.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2020, 01:44 AM
 
21,109 posts, read 13,571,675 times
Reputation: 19723
Quote:
Originally Posted by DUNNDFRNT View Post
I think 18 unarmed killings a year is way too much. If your cab company advertise they only kill 18 passengers a year in crashes but thats great because 700 people a year die in crashes, you would go out of business.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2020, 03:43 AM
 
Location: Just over the horizon
18,461 posts, read 7,094,796 times
Reputation: 11707
Quote:
Originally Posted by kokonutty View Post
Rolfe's training required him to inform a suspect that he was under arrest before handcuffing him; he did not.
The "stolen Taser," (Brosnan's, not Rolfe's) was no more than an inert piece of plastic when Rolfe gunned down his victim, contrary to his training, regulations and the law. Do we need to discuss his kicking of a dying man and withholding medical aid? How about shooting towards and endangering a group of people and vehicles?

Your reference to me in regard to looting and arson is a ridiculous, ignorant personal attack that is in violation of the terms of service here; enjoy your time off.


Not necessarily true.

The Tazer is still functional after firing it's prongs, it still works as a stun gun, when pressed against the person.
So, if they had caught Brooks without disarming him, he would still be armed with a functional weapon that he could have used against them.

And if they let him go, he could potentially have used it on someone else.

And some tazers are capable of firing multiple times, not sure about the particular model in question.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2020, 03:51 AM
 
Location: Various
9,049 posts, read 3,525,554 times
Reputation: 5470
Quote:
Originally Posted by kokonutty View Post
Because lawyers deal with facts and the facts here are damning.
No because you are sprouting nonsense like the lawyer and DA. Kicked the victim......
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2020, 04:56 AM
 
Location: Pennsylvania
31,340 posts, read 14,274,675 times
Reputation: 27863
Answer, yes. And then the officer should start a new life somewhere else under a new name.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:33 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top