Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-26-2020, 12:32 PM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,170,143 times
Reputation: 21738

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Du Ma View Post
So if we get rid of QI for cops by suing them personally for punitive damages, does that mean cops can also sue people for punitive damages?
No, that's not how it works.

A police officer by definition holds him/herself out to be an expert.

Even if we were to accept the argument that the cop had no college education, the cop was thoroughly trained at the police academy in search and seizure, specially apply the State's statutes, the State's case law and federal court case law.

The cop receive additional instruction during his training period.

So, when the cop intentionally conducts an illegal search/seizure, what are we to think?

He doesn't understand?

Really? Then why is he wearing a badge?

The amusing thing is you wouldn't tolerate that from a doctor for even one second.

If a doctor didn't understand how to use surgical tools or didn't understand the procedure and butchered you, then what?

You gonna go home and sulk?

No, you're going to sue the doctor and do what you can to get his medical license revoked.

What recourse do you have with police?

None.

You can't sue, because the cop has Qualified Immunity.

What punishment does the cop get?

None.

The cop won't even get an oral reprimand.

If god himself comes down from his throne and performs and miracle and the cop actually gets a written reprimand, the union will make sure it goes into the cop's "unofficial" personnel file.

You know, so it doesn't harm his chances of promotion......to training officer.....where he can incorrectly teach even more cops how to conduct illegal searches/seizures to violate even more people's rights.



You start suing cops, garnisheeing their salaries and pensions and placing liens on their homes and the condos they have for their mistresses and that will make them think twice.

To answer your question directly, cops don't have legal standing as government employees.

That is not to say cops have no avenue of redress.

Cops get worker's compensation. Courts also award restitution which may address physical injuries or other losses.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-26-2020, 01:20 PM
509
 
6,321 posts, read 7,048,872 times
Reputation: 9450
The Democrats got rid of qualified immunity for Federal wildland fire fighters at the turn of the century.


The acreage burned sky rocketed as NOBODY was being aggressive in putting out fires. Thousands of Federal firefighters simply quit. For many Federal firefighters it is a "volunteer" assignment to you can refuse and they did.


Today, the majority of firefighters even on Federal fires are contract crews and state and local firefighters that still have qualified immunity through their state or local employer.


I suspect the results for police will be similar.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2020, 05:19 PM
 
33,387 posts, read 34,847,766 times
Reputation: 20030
qualified immunity needs to go away for cops, judges, and elected officials. in its place would be malpractice insurance like medical personal have to carry. taht way cops can be held accountable for their actions. it also means that cops can have criminal charges filed against them when they really screw up. and remember ALWAYS FILM THE COPS.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2020, 04:30 AM
 
Location: Cali
14,232 posts, read 4,596,290 times
Reputation: 8321
I find it funny that some idiots on c-d are comparing cops to judges/doctors. It's like their critical thinking isn't even there.

Do judges or doctors have to make life & death split- second decisions? If they hesitate to act, they will get killed/seriously injured? But if they act too fast, they will face felony murder charges and/or civil litigation ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:43 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top