Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Since Dems are science-driven, they should be able to provide scientific study's proving that Hillary Clinton would have saved more lives than the 3,170,000 (as of 8-24-20) lives Trump has saved, or that she would have had less Covid-19 fatalities than Trump's 170,000.
If they cannot produce any specific scientific studies, then their claims are 100% anecdotal!
In fact, the Dems have no idea what Hillary would have done differently. It's 100% speculation.
For all they know, Trump saved MORE lives than Hillary would have, or Hillary would have caused more Covid-19 fatalities.
There are no Covid-19 related scientific studies mentioning Trump and Clinton by name whatsoever.
There are no double-blind, or peer-reviewed studies on that specific topic at all.
Remember when Dems posted endlessly that Hydroxychloroquine's effectiveness was all anecdotal?
So too then, is their claim that Trump's Covid-19 results were any worse than Hillary's Clinton's would have been.
They have NO scientific studies that address that specific claim, so their claims are totally anecdotal, heresay, speculation, & scientifically unproven.
If Libs are going to apply scientific studies to attempt to prove global warming, & the ineffectiveness of HCQ, then they must also apply specific scientific studies to the Trump accusations, or they must be refuted outright as being anecdotal.
Since Dems are science-driven, they should be able to provide scientific study's proving that Hillary Clinton would have saved more lives than the 3,170,000 (as of 8-24-20) lives Trump has saved, or that she would have had less Covid-19 fatalities than Trump's 170,000.
If they cannot produce any specific scientific studies, then their claims are 100% anecdotal!
In fact, the Dems have no idea what Hillary would have done differently. It's 100% speculation.
For all they know, Trump saved MORE lives than Hillary would have, or Hillary would have caused more Covid-19 fatalities.
There are no Covid-19 related scientific studies mentioning Trump and Clinton by name whatsoever.
There are no double-blind, or peer-reviewed studies on that specific topic at all.
Remember when Dems posted endlessly that Hydroxychloroquine's effectiveness was all anecdotal?
So too then, is their claim that Trump's Covid-19 results were any worse than Hillary's Clinton's would have been.
They have NO scientific studies that address that specific claim, so their claims are totally anecdotal, heresay, speculation, & scientifically unproven.
If Libs are going to apply scientific studies to attempt to prove global warming, & the ineffectiveness of HCQ, then they must also apply specific scientific studies to the Trump accusations, or they must be refuted outright as being anecdotal.
It'd be less than what we have today for the simple reason that Hillary would not disband our pandemic response team and would not eliminate our pandemic disease team stationed in China to watch out for exactly something like this.
And she would not call the pandemic a hoax and would put in rules to wear masks in public.
.
Hillary would have pre-emptively lobbed a nuke at Wuhan at the first sign of the virus, thus eradicating it at its source and being hailed as the greatest virus-killer (and Wuhanese-killer) of all time.
It is an interesting query - how would have Hillary handled it?
Anyone have the spare time to look back at her decisions as Secretary of State and make a determination of how risk adverse she was and how we could compare it to a pandemic situation?
I only know her high-lights as Secretary of State. Would she have put Fauci in charge of the response? (The man who presided over the NIH that funded, through third-party organizations, gain-of-function research on bat coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute.) Who would have been her "experts"?
Since Dems are science-driven, they should be able to provide scientific study's proving that Hillary Clinton would have saved more lives than the 3,170,000 (as of 8-24-20) lives Trump has saved, or that she would have had less Covid-19 fatalities than Trump's 170,000.
If they cannot produce any specific scientific studies, then their claims are 100% anecdotal!
In fact, the Dems have no idea what Hillary would have done differently. It's 100% speculation.
For all they know, Trump saved MORE lives than Hillary would have, or Hillary would have caused more Covid-19 fatalities.
There are no Covid-19 related scientific studies mentioning Trump and Clinton by name whatsoever.
There are no double-blind, or peer-reviewed studies on that specific topic at all.
Remember when Dems posted endlessly that Hydroxychloroquine's effectiveness was all anecdotal?
So too then, is their claim that Trump's Covid-19 results were any worse than Hillary's Clinton's would have been.
They have NO scientific studies that address that specific claim, so their claims are totally anecdotal, heresay, speculation, & scientifically unproven.
If Libs are going to apply scientific studies to attempt to prove global warming, & the ineffectiveness of HCQ, then they must also apply specific scientific studies to the Trump accusations, or they must be refuted outright as being anecdotal.
Science is the pursuit and application of knowledge and understanding of the natural and social world following a systematic methodology based on evidence.
Sometimes you can read something so devoid of any intellectual rigor that you wonder if it was typed by a stack of raccoons wearing a trench coat.
dunno....democrats threw the world's largest hissy fit when Trump tried to ban flights....xenophobic, etc
Biden even went so far as to say it's no time for Trump's xenophobic bs....and saying " banning all travel from Europe...or any part of the world....will not stop it"
“Labeling COVID-19 a foreign virus does not displace the accountability for the misjudgements that have taken place so far by the Trump administration,” Biden said. “The [Wuhan] coronavirus does not discriminate based on national origin, race, gender, or zip code.”
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
