Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-25-2020, 01:26 PM
 
19,573 posts, read 8,522,211 times
Reputation: 10096

Advertisements

Representative Doug Collins (R-GA), who will be running to be Georgia's next US Senator in November, is introducing a constitutional amendment that would mandate a 10 year delay to any legislation that added justices to the Supreme Court.

Quote:
Doug Collins to Introduce Constitutional Amendment Prohibiting Adding Justices to Supreme Court

Representative Doug Collins is preparing to introduce a constitutional amendment to block potential attempts to add justices to the Supreme Court as some Democrats eye adding seats should President Trump’s upcoming nominee be confirmed.

The amendment would block “court packing,” or adding justices to the Supreme Court, for 10 years after any bill is passed to enlarge the court, a measure Collins said aims to “take the political emotion of the moment out of the way.”

“The proposed amendment—really, it should be a bipartisan issue,” the Georgia Republican said. “We should not have decisions like packing the court to be based on emotional or political decisions. The reason we did it is because it seems like the Democrats, every time they don’t get what they want, they want to change the rules.”
Honestly, I do not understand why he is trying to approach it this way. If he was to propose a constitutional amendment permanently setting the number of justices at 9, as rare as ratified constitutional amendments are, that might just pass. But this ten year delay business is too clever by half. It is understandable what his thinking is. But why not just end this discussion once and for all and permanently set the number at 9.

Even if the Democrats were to win control of the Senate in November, they are not likely to pack the courts. It is a nice red-meat promise for their rabidly foaming at the mouth supporters. But they are not likely to actually do it. In any case, that moment will be here and gone before any constitutional amendment gets ratified.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-25-2020, 01:31 PM
 
17,308 posts, read 12,255,968 times
Reputation: 17262
I doubt we would see any constitutional amendment passed in today’s political climate no matter how popular.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2020, 01:32 PM
 
34,279 posts, read 19,375,883 times
Reputation: 17261
LOL. Not happening.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2020, 01:43 PM
 
8,957 posts, read 2,559,282 times
Reputation: 4725
The Democrats would never agree to not burn the whole system to the ground, so this'll go nowhere but it should make for good political ads when they refuse to consider it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2020, 01:46 PM
 
Location: Arizona
6,104 posts, read 2,725,398 times
Reputation: 5884
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbythegreat View Post
The Democrats would never agree to not burn the whole system to the ground, so this'll go nowhere but it should make for good political ads when they refuse to consider it.
The Dems will just counter with the Republicans hypocrisy on SC juges

Let the American people choose era wait no let the Senate chose.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2020, 01:48 PM
 
8,957 posts, read 2,559,282 times
Reputation: 4725
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goofball86 View Post
The Dems will just counter with the Republicans hypocrisy on SC juges

Let the American people choose era wait no let the Senate chose.
They won't have an intelligent arguement though.

Filling a SCOTUS seat is different from rigging the system because you can't win fairly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2020, 01:51 PM
 
Location: Arizona
6,104 posts, read 2,725,398 times
Reputation: 5884
The Dems shouldn't entertain Dugs silly patrician games. Stack the court Dems the voters will give you a mandate to counter crooked Mitch.

Mitch corrupted the court with his partisan games now the Dems must act.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2020, 02:15 PM
 
19,573 posts, read 8,522,211 times
Reputation: 10096
A poll presented by the leftist periodical Newsweek:
Only 32% of Americans Support Increasing Number of Supreme Court Justices: Poll

In a new Yahoo News/YouGov poll, released Thursday, only 32 percent of Americans backed expanding the number of justices in the U.S. Supreme Court. Thirty-nine percent of voters surveyed opposed the idea, while 29 percent said they weren't sure if the bench should be expanded. Democrats were more in favor of the move, with 48 percent in support. Only 20 percent of Republicans surveyed agreed with the proposal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2020, 02:30 PM
 
622 posts, read 410,352 times
Reputation: 743
The process to amend the Constitution has been made deliberately cumbersome to avoid frivolous amendments. Here is the process in summary:

"Article V of the Constitution prescribes how an amendment can become a part of the Constitution. While there are two ways, only one has ever been used. All 27 Amendments have been ratified after two-thirds of the House and Senate approve of the proposal and send it to the states for a vote. Then, three-fourths of the states must affirm the proposed Amendment.

The other method of passing an amendment requires a Constitutional Convention to be called by two-thirds of the legislatures of the States. That Convention can propose as many amendments as it deems necessary. Those amendments must be approved by three-fourths of the states."


Neither the Collins proposal nor the one Democrats want in terms of restricting the term of Supreme Court justices to 18 years is likely to pass.

https://www.lexisnexis.com/constitut...howitsdone.asp
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:33 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top