Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Only when the US gets disbanded first.
Or when the EU (European Union) accepts the rest of the world (with the exception of the US because they disbanded the UN) into their organisation, which probably will never happen.
Only when the US gets disbanded first.
Or when the EU (European Union) accepts the rest of the world (with the exception of the US because they disbanded the UN) into their organisation, which probably will never happen.
The un is not useful in the grand scheme of things TD. They are not keeping the peace as they say they would. They clearly ignore their peacekeepers illegal activities such as raping and killing those they are suppose to protect. They are not delivering humanitarian aid. They are not delivering the food they are suppose to.
Hmmm. Any fraud in Iraq? Any rapes...and even murders? How about torture? And how about $3 trillion...for what again? The UN is a shining example of humanity and selfless efficiency in comparison to what we've got going on right in our own back yard. Maybe we should do a little cleanup here before being so pompous as to go around poking others with a sharp stick over nothing nearly half as bad...
Then, why does the useless un have "peace keepers"?
Because the US doesn't have them.
The US military are already looking odd at how the Dutch military does their mission; the Dutch always make contact with the local population and ask them what they need. This is the main reason why the Dutch refused to be in the Iraqi invasion force, they didn't wanted to be associated with the invaders, because it would make our mission much more difficult.
Because the US doesn't have them.
The US military are already looking odd at how the Dutch military does their mission; the Dutch always make contact with the local population and ask them what they need.
This thread is not about Iraq
It is about the un
The un peacekeeping force is suppose to go into countries like Darfur and quell the violence. To offer humanitarian aid. Yet - they have not quelled the violence and they have not provided humanitarian aid - the "peacekeepers" have raped and pillaged the villagers though
Yeah - the useless un - not worth contributing to IMO -
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Only when united in United Nations has a different meaning than in United States is my statement false.
Only totalitarian governments 'keep' the peace by threatening with unproportional violence or life long prison sentences and / or education camps.
