Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Here is one chart of how votes were coming in, in one particular race. I won't bother posting every single chart where this same phenomenon happened over and over, but it happened in many states. I watched this happen in the Presidential races as well in some states. I am not one spewing out conspiracy nonsense. I am looking for the actual reasons why voting came in, in this same pattern. The Republican leads the Democrat by a certain percentage. At one moment in time, the Democrat all of a sudden gets a 100% surge straight up in votes instantaneously and surpasses the Republican. After that happens, the normal chart curve resumes, with the Democrat maintaining the lead until the end.
What counting process accounts for the same basic tracking curve for both the Democrat and Republican candidate, but then has one sharp surge for the Democrat before resuming the prior curve?
You write that you are not "one spewing out conspiracy nonsense" BUT what you have posted is certainly an oddity and that is exactly where many conspiracy theories are born.
It is very odd that a whole pile of ballots would suddenly be for Biden unless they were fraudulent, harvested or some "glitch" in the computer made it happen.
It is a shame that some one didn't see this and give the machine a kick to make it start producing and changing votes for Trump.
You write that you are not "one spewing out conspiracy nonsense" BUT what you have posted is certainly an oddity and that is exactly where many conspiracy theories are born.
It is very odd that a whole pile of ballots would suddenly be for Biden unless they were fraudulent, harvested or some "glitch" in the computer made it happen.
It is a shame that some one didn't see this and give the machine a kick to make it start producing and changing votes for Trump.
I am looking for the real answer for this repeating scenario.
The data from Mackowiak's second map showing Biden receiving 100% of the newly counted votes was released at 5:04 a.m. by Decision Desk HQ which showed Biden with 2,130,695 votes at Trump with 2,200,902 votes. But that data was not correct. A tweet posted later by Decision Desk HQ at 5:43 a.m. brought both Trump and Biden's vote count down, with Trump at 2,217,540 votes and Biden at 2,019,899 votes. In a tweet this afternoon, Decision Desk HQ wrote, "This morning there was a clerical error in the Shiawassee, MI county presidential data." The company explained, "Once we identified the error, we cleared the erroneous data and updated it with the correct data as provided by officials. We stand by our data as reflected on results.decisiondeskhq.com."
Yup. You can be sure they'll also keep repeating the claim that there were more votes than voters in Wayne County, Michigan, even though it was shown that whoever came up with that conspiracy was looking at Minnesota voting precincts, not Michigan.
Here is one chart of how votes were coming in, in one particular race. I won't bother posting every single chart where this same phenomenon happened over and over, but it happened in many states. I watched this happen in the Presidential races as well in some states. I am not one spewing out conspiracy nonsense. I am looking for the actual reasons why voting came in, in this same pattern. The Republican leads the Democrat by a certain percentage. At one moment in time, the Democrat all of a sudden gets a 100% surge straight up in votes instantaneously and surpasses the Republican. After that happens, the normal chart curve resumes, with the Democrat maintaining the lead until the end.
What counting process accounts for the same basic tracking curve for both the Democrat and Republican candidate, but then has one sharp surge for the Democrat before resuming the prior curve?
Fraud
This "increase" in votes happened at a rate which is faster than the ability of the voting machines to even tabulate (legally).
There are SO MANY pieces of evidence for this massive fraud that there is no way that Biden will take office.
The real question becomes whether Biden will be arrested before January, or whether they will arrest all the conspirators first.
The sad thing is that there is going to be so many people to arrest that Gitmo may not be big enough and they may have to make a military base into an improvised prison. As they are enemy combatants against the US, they do not have to be held or tried on US soil.
It would be nice to "house" them in a nice, hot hell hole like Guam, UAE, Saudi, or a very, very cold place in the Arctic. They could not be housed on US soil, as there would be too many of their allies "protesting" around the prison that would have to be thrown in there as well. We only have so many prison cells in the US and there are not enough to go around for all the democrats.
This "increase" in votes happened at a rate which is faster than the ability of the voting machines to even tabulate (legally).
There are SO MANY pieces of evidence for this massive fraud that there is no way that Biden will take office.
The real question becomes whether Biden will be arrested before January, or whether they will arrest all the conspirators first.
The sad thing is that there is going to be so many people to arrest that Gitmo may not be big enough and they may have to make a military base into an improvised prison. As they are enemy combatants against the US, they do not have to be held or tried on US soil.
It would be nice to "house" them in a nice, hot hell hole like Guam, UAE, Saudi, or a very, very cold place in the Arctic. They could not be housed on US soil, as there would be too many of their allies "protesting" around the prison that would have to be thrown in there as well. We only have so many prison cells in the US and there are not enough to go around for all the democrats.
Even if we use the graph from the link you provided, it still shows the arc for the Republican and Democrat tracking with an almost identical differential, then there is a very short period of time where the Democrat outpaces the Republican greatly, until he passes the Republican, BUT then the arc goes back to the way it was before the Democrat surge. So my question still remains. Why does the arc look the same way prior to and after the short Democrat surge period? If the majority of mail in ballots were being counted last and if mail in ballots are mostly for Democrats, why didn't the graph continue with the Democrat greatly outpacing the Republican? Why did it revert back to the pre-surge arc? Again, no conspiracy theory here. I am just looking for a logical reason.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
