Quote:
Originally Posted by dixiegirl7
Were you not yet born or did you sleep through the Clinton administration? Since you say you can read:
The Joint Inquiry Staff has reviewed five past terrorist attacks or attempts against the United States as part of its inquiry into September 11: the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center (WTC I); the 1996 attack on the U.S. military barracks Khobar Towers, in Saudi Arabia; the 1998 attacks on U.S. Embassies in Africa; the 1999 "Millennium" plot; and the 2000 attack on U.S.S. Cole.
|
Your problems are these: 1) you think these events were out of synch with what preceded and what followed, 2) you think virtually nothing was done about any of these, 3) you think Bush has dealt effectively with terrorists, and 4) you imply the election of Gore in 2000 would have resulted in more such events.
Events of the 1980's: PanAm terminal bombing at JFK, US embassy bombing in Bierut, PanAm 830 bombing, Marine barracks bombing in Beirut, Federal Plaza bombing in Manhattan, bombing of the US Senate in DC, TWA 847 hijacking, Zona Rosa attacks in El Salvador, Achille Lauro hijacking, Alex Odeh bombing in California, TWA 840 bombing, Berlin disco bombing, Air Force bus bombing in Greece, PanAm 103 bombing.
Events of the 2000's: 9/11 attacks, anthrax attacks in NY and DC, King Fahd Mosque plot, AA 63 shoe-bomber plot, US embassy bombing in Lima, LAX El Al attacks, McDonald's bombing in Moscow, Riyadh compound bombings, US convoy bombing in Gaza, Khobar massacre, Herald Square bomb plot in NYC, US consulate bombing in Jeddah, church bombing in Rawalpindi, Heath Row airliner plot, US embassy attack in Damascus, US embassy attack in Athens, NATO summit bombings in Ankara, Franfurt/Ramstein plot, US convoy bombing in Beirut.
The above do not include significant terrorist operations carried out against other or generalized western interests such as those in Bali, Casablanca, Istanbul, Madrid, Dubai, London, Amman, or Algiers. Neither are any attacks occurring in Iraq noted, such as the UN headquarters bombing or the attempted assassination of Ban Ki-Moon.
Now, suppose you research what was virtually done with respect to the terrorists attacks above, then compare and contrast those results with the virtually-nothing that was done about the attacks you referenced earlier. To be sure we have our virtually-nothing baseline set and agreed upon, here are some brief details...
WTC BOMBING: Four perpetrators caught, tried, convicted, sentenced to life in prison.
KHOBAR TOWERS: Thirteen Saudis and one Lebanese indicted. FBI says "some" are in custody.
AFRICAN EMBASSIES: Locals caught and prosecuted there. Four serving life in prison here. Three in prison in the UK. Two held in Guantanamo. [Republicans call retaliatory missile strikes in Afghanistan/Sudan "wag the dog" distraction from nation's most important issue -- Monica Lewinsky.]
MILLENIUM PLOT: Perpetrator caught, debriefed, tried, convicted, sentenced to 22 years in prison.
USS COLE BOMBING: Six locals caught and prosecuted there. Two sentenced to death. US final report completed in February 2001. New administration chooses to take no action.
So that would be the yardstick. See how those before's and after's stack up against virtually-nothing and get back to us.
As for Gore, your statement is purely partisan speculation. If you read your own report, you know that the Clinton administration had progessively expanded focus on and resources devoted to counter-terrorism efforts. Via legal means, of course. Gore was a part of the administration that warned its successors that terrorism would be the number one problem on their watch. That warning went unheeded. Given that record, and the less than noteworthy record that Bush has laid down since, it is quite hard to see anything at all beyond bias in your statement.