Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-25-2020, 05:20 PM
 
1,231 posts, read 450,513 times
Reputation: 835

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
Um nope they already certified for Biden. This is for down ballot races.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-25-2020, 05:52 PM
 
Location: 23.7 million to 162 million miles North of Venus
23,949 posts, read 12,753,648 times
Reputation: 10606
Quote:
Originally Posted by Genz View Post
Once again it was not an official court hearing and nobody testified under oath. Anyone can say what he or she thinks is true but it's irrelevant to anything. If you think some random meeting in a hotel is going to get you to the Supreme court I say you have no idea how anything works.
Apparently you failed to remember what you'd said in your comment that I was responding to.

In your comment that was I responding to, you said.."A person does not testify by phone."

My response to that comment was...

Quote:
Originally Posted by berdee View Post
Where do they not testify by phone? This hearing isn't a court hearing, but, courts in PA, as well as other states, do allow telephonic testimony.


https://www.pacodeandbulletin.gov/Di.../s101.128.html
Maybe it is yourself that you need to worry about with having "no idea how anything works".

"nobody testified under oath"
I wasn't watching but did they use witnesses affidavits? A statement made on an affidavit, that is signed by a notary, is the same as being under oath. Lie on an affidavit and the person lying can be charged with perjury.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-25-2020, 06:10 PM
 
1,199 posts, read 736,203 times
Reputation: 609
Quote:
Originally Posted by berdee View Post
Apparently you failed to remember what you'd said in your comment that I was responding to.

In your comment that was I responding to, you said.."A person does not testify by phone."

My response to that comment was...


Maybe it is yourself that you need to worry about with having "no idea how anything works".

"nobody testified under oath"
I wasn't watching but did they use witnesses affidavits? A statement made on an affidavit, that is signed by a notary, is the same as being under oath. Lie on an affidavit and the person lying can be charged with perjury.
Out of curiosity, did anyone say any detailed information about what they saw directly with their own two eyes in those affidavits?

Or are they based on hearsay? Because if it's the later, they could be telling the truth but their testimony has no teeth so to speak if they don't have direct experience to the claims they are making.

I.E. Joe owes money to Debbie. Debbie goes to the court and tells the judge that her friend Ruth told her that Joe stated he won't pay back the money to Debbie.

This is hearsay and has no weight in a court of law.

From my understanding, a lot of these affidavits fall into a similar pattern as the example above
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-25-2020, 06:35 PM
 
34,289 posts, read 19,423,477 times
Reputation: 17261
Quote:
Originally Posted by berdee View Post
"nobody testified under oath"
I wasn't watching but did they use witnesses affidavits? A statement made on an affidavit, that is signed by a notary, is the same as being under oath. Lie on an affidavit and the person lying can be charged with perjury.
LOL. Meanwhile in reality....

The "affidavits" were not signed, nor swore under. They were online responses, and apparently in the fine print was "you are signing this under affidavit". In reality these are absolutely not enforceable. And Judges pointed this out after one of the attorneys claimed these were the ones left after they filtered out all the one they could tell were false.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-25-2020, 06:36 PM
 
Location: 23.7 million to 162 million miles North of Venus
23,949 posts, read 12,753,648 times
Reputation: 10606
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stizzel View Post
Out of curiosity, did anyone say any detailed information about what they saw directly with their own two eyes in those affidavits?

Or are they based on hearsay? Because if it's the later, they could be telling the truth but their testimony has no teeth so to speak if they don't have direct experience to the claims they are making.

I.E. Joe owes money to Debbie. Debbie goes to the court and tells the judge that her friend Ruth told her that Joe stated he won't pay back the money to Debbie.

This is hearsay and has no weight in a court of law.

From my understanding, a lot of these affidavits fall into a similar pattern as the example above
I haven't been paying all that much attention over the past while to know if they'd released affidavits showing what's on them. Perhaps someone who has can answer your question. Personally though, I'd never make a statement and sign a sworn affidavit based on hearsay evidence.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-25-2020, 06:37 PM
 
Location: 23.7 million to 162 million miles North of Venus
23,949 posts, read 12,753,648 times
Reputation: 10606
Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar View Post
LOL. Meanwhile in reality....

The "affidavits" were not signed, nor swore under. They were online responses, and apparently in the fine print was "you are signing this under affidavit". In reality these are absolutely not enforceable. And Judges pointed this out after one of the attorneys claimed these were the ones left after they filtered out all the one they could tell were false.
Okay good, you've actually seen the affidavits. Perhaps you can show all of them to us.


edit to add, e-signatures are legally binding
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-25-2020, 06:41 PM
 
26,580 posts, read 14,494,590 times
Reputation: 7448
Quote:
Originally Posted by berdee View Post
.... did they use witnesses affidavits?

the trump campaign's attorney admitted in court before a maricopa county judge that they had affidavits, submitted under penalty of perjury, that were blatantly false and the rest they had no idea if they were legit or not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-25-2020, 06:51 PM
 
Location: Tri STATE!!!
8,518 posts, read 3,771,291 times
Reputation: 6349
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
PA - 1.7 million mail in ballot sent out.... 2.8 million mail in ballots collected
You tell me, how the **** can that happen?
Sweet Jesus.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-25-2020, 07:07 PM
 
34,289 posts, read 19,423,477 times
Reputation: 17261
Quote:
Originally Posted by berdee View Post
Okay good, you've actually seen the affidavits. Perhaps you can show all of them to us.


edit to add, e-signatures are legally binding
https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...ni-vote-fraud/

Covers a lot of it. But perjury for a sworn affidavit requires it to be relevant, and knowingly false. And all to often Trumps teams affidavits have not been either as per the judges. And good luck getting a e-signature THAT COULD BE FROM ANYONE to be used against the person who is claimed in the affidavit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-25-2020, 07:13 PM
 
9,915 posts, read 9,628,449 times
Reputation: 10120
Why were the audience laughing when the man said there were 570,000 votes spiked for biden and 3,200 for Trump?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top