Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
To say out-loud that you find the results of the 2020 presidential election odd is to invite derision. You must be a crank or a conspiracy theorist. Mark me down as a crank, then. I am a pollster and I find this election to be deeply puzzling. I also think that the Trump campaign is still well within its rights to contest the tabulations. Something very strange happened in America’s democracy in the early hours of Wednesday November 4 and the days that followed. It’s reasonable for a lot of Americans to want to find out exactly what.
When unusual patterns happen in Wall street they trigger an automatic fraud investigation by the SEC. How can you win both Florida and Ohio and lose Michigan ? How can a Republican win comfortably in NC but lose in GA ? Win TX in a landslide and lose in AZ ?!
Demographics are different than in 2004 and Donald Trump is not George W. Bush.
There is plenty of evidence. It's called circumstantial evidence. I realize you only recognize circumstantial evidence when we're dealing with a Democrat hoax like "Russian collusion" or "a YouTube video caused a terrorist attack," but here the circumstantial is overwhelming. You'd have to be a complete moron to discount it, which is why the Democrat base keeps screeching that there is "no evidence."
Democrats didn't run to Court in deep blue states to change election laws. They knew they didn't need to.
Democrats mailed out ballots to EVERYONE on the registration rolls even though they KNEW the rolls weren't even close to accurate.
Almost every swing state that Trump was up in substantially on election night stopped counting at the same time. All were ran by Democrats or the areas/cities that stopped counting were run by Democrats.
Election observers were kicked out of all the big blue cities right before the gigantic vote dumps in the early morning hours of November 4. What could the reason for that have possibly been?
There's a very good reason most Trump supporters don't believe this was a legitimate election. We have brains and know a scam when we see it.
"Some circumstantial evidence if very strong as when you find a trout in the milk."- Henry David Thoreau
There is plenty of evidence. It's called circumstantial evidence. I realize you only recognize circumstantial evidence when we're dealing with a Democrat hoax like "Russian collusion" or "a YouTube video caused a terrorist attack," but here the circumstantial is overwhelming. You'd have to be a complete moron to discount it, which is why the Democrat base keeps screeching that there is "no evidence."
Democrats didn't run to Court in deep blue states to change election laws. They knew they didn't need to.
Democrats mailed out ballots to EVERYONE on the registration rolls even though they KNEW the rolls weren't even close to accurate.
Almost every swing state that Trump was up in substantially on election night stopped counting at the same time. All were ran by Democrats or the areas/cities that stopped counting were run by Democrats.
Election observers were kicked out of all the big blue cities right before the gigantic vote dumps in the early morning hours of November 4. What could the reason for that have possibly been?
There's a very good reason most Trump supporters don't believe this was a legitimate election. We have brains and know a scam when we see it.
"Some circumstantial evidence is very strong, as when you find a trout in the milk."- Henry David Thoreau
Last edited by Hyperthetic; 11-29-2020 at 12:57 PM..
There is plenty of evidence. It's called circumstantial evidence. I realize you only recognize circumstantial evidence when we're dealing with a Democrat hoax like "Russian collusion" or "a YouTube video caused a terrorist attack," but here the circumstantial is overwhelming. You'd have to be a complete moron to discount it, which is why the Democrat base keeps screeching that there is "no evidence."
Democrats didn't run to Court in deep blue states to change election laws. They knew they didn't need to.
Democrats mailed out ballots to EVERYONE on the registration rolls even though they KNEW the rolls weren't even close to accurate.
Almost every swing state that Trump was up in substantially on election night stopped counting at the same time. All were ran by Democrats or the areas/cities that stopped counting were run by Democrats.
Election observers were kicked out of all the big blue cities right before the gigantic vote dumps in the early morning hours of November 4. What could the reason for that have possibly been?
There's a very good reason most Trump supporters don't believe this was a legitimate election. We have brains and know a scam when we see it.
You believe - good for you - but as Judge Bibas (A TRUMP APPOINTEE) wrote. “Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here.”
Perhaps the Federal Court of Appeals is staffed by Morons. I mean that is their life's work - hearing evidence and deciding on the facts and none of Trump's legal maneuvering has gone anywhere. Georgia is a Red State - run by Trump ally with a Republican SoS - they both voted for Trump but they did their respective jobs - did a recount - Biden won. That is not a coincidence - the truth sometimes hurts - it did when Trump won. Time to buck up brother.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.