Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
No, that is hearing argument. That is not the presentation of evidence
If you have a law degree, which I suspect you do not, time to give it back if you don't understand this very basic concept
Oh my what do I do now? An argument is presenting the facts of law that are the subject of a Certiorari grant. I am fully aware my dear of trial evidence and appeal evidence applications.
Maybe you need to give back your degree you got out the cracker jack box.
P.S. I respect Ralph's opinion, he's smart, you are not.
yes New Mexico can sue Texas and have it go to the US Supreme Court- They both have to have an issue central to them to have standing. It only makes sense that if they filed in a state court that the home state would have an advantage.
NM and Texas both had their water involved. That gave them standing.
Texas has no standing to check the internal voting mechanisms of Georgia any more than they have of the Georgia Republic.
..yes New Mexico can sue Texas and have it go to the US Supreme Court- They both have to have an issue central to them to have standing. It only makes sense that if they filed in a state court that the home state would have an advantage.
You can bet though the state not seeking a remedy would petition it for removal to the USSC as an original jurisdiction/authority case.
The only reason the courts are refusing to listen to any of the lawsuits is that they do not want to deal with it and they do not want Donald Trump to be elected President.
If they wanted President Trump to remain in office, they would listen to the evidence instead of making up excuses like no standing...I guess Georgia is going to have to prosecute themselves to have any standing.
Actually they aren't listening because they have to represent The Constitution of the United States.
Which is not relevant here. Do let us know when you come to understand the meaning of "court of original jurisdiction."
Hint: No writ is necessary for a court of original jurisdiction.
Cross thinking, I meant Bill of Complaint, just as was filed in the Ohio/Kentucky River dispute, you have never typed something while thinking of something else?
What are you talking about? There were no other cases. Texas only sued in SC.
did you bother to look at the post I was replying to and which I quoted in mine? That person referenced the several dozen other suits filed by and on behalf of Trump, not just the Texas case. Like any other conversation, threads in a discussion thread rarely remain strictly and explicitly on topic
did you bother to look at the post I was replying to and which I quoted in mine? That person referenced the several dozen other suits filed by and on behalf of Trump, not just the Texas case. Like any other conversation, threads in a discussion thread rarely remain strictly and explicitly on topic
Which other case did the court claim "no standing" as the poster that you quoted discussed? Or did you conveniently skip over that part?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
