Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Status:
"“If a thing loves, it is infinite.”"
(set 4 days ago)
Location: Great Britain
27,185 posts, read 13,469,799 times
Reputation: 19508
It's been recently reported in the media that Prince Andrew's chief accuser Virginia Giuffre Roberts, was a prostitute who lied about her age and was paid "half a million" by the disgraced paedophile Jeffrey Epstein, new court papers allege.
The Daily Telegraph was the first to publish the story, and British Journalist Sharon Churcher, has made the allegations. Churcher knew Virginia Giuffre Roberts and was previously linked to email exchanges with her.
Although it doesn't get any easier for Prince Andrew as another one of his wealthy friend Peter Nygard was arrested by the FBI earlier this year, in relation to sex trafficking women.
According to the report, Sharon Churcher, the journalist who first revealed that Giuffre was among Epstein’s victims, told New York publisher Tony Lyons that Giuffre lied about her age when she met Epstein.
“She took a year off . Apparently she was 16, not 15, when she was recruited . But she’d been on the game for about a year then. Epstein’s women were – he basically had prostitutes,” the paper quoted Churcher as saying about Giuffre, citing a transcript of her conversation with Lyons.
“She took a year off . Apparently she was 16, not 15, when she was recruited . But she’d been on the game for about a year then. Epstein’s women were – he basically had prostitutes,” the paper quoted Churcher as saying about Giuffre, citing a transcript of her conversation with Lyons.
Churcher was quoted as saying that Giuffre was “suing everybody,” including Epstein’s lawyer, Harvard professor Alan Dershowitz. “The idea is that he will then pay her off. This really is blackmail,” she said, adding that Giuffre would “just move on to other people” and that Epstein had “paid her off.”
“She had settled with Epstein. She’d taken half a million, I think it was.”
The journalist also reportedly suggested that Giuffre may have produced fake emails that were later presented as having been written by Churcher.
In a comment to the Telegraph, Giuffre’s lawyer, Chuck Cooper, said: “We are looking forward to taking Ms. Churcher’s deposition under oath.”
PolitiFact: "Viral photo, flight logs don't prove Chief Justice John Roberts visited Jeffrey Epstein's private island."
USAToday: " Fact Check: Ghislaine Maxwell, French modeling agent seen together in viral photo." It's not Roberts in the photo, it's French modeling agent Jean-Luc Brunel.
AP: "Photo does not show John Roberts with Ghislaine Maxwell." They are reporting the same as USA Today.
Newsweek: " Fact Check: Does Photo Show Chief Justice John Roberts on Jeffrey Epstein's Private Island?" There is no proof that Justice Roberts was on that island or plane.
Reuters: Fact Check: "Photo does not show John Roberts and Bill Clinton on Epstein's island."
So we have the gatewaypundit, a conspiracy driven propaganda source with a bad track record vs multiple sources that say it's not true. We have a Justice that sided with the rule of law and will not over turn an election and we have a desperate sore loser with a bar that is never too low to lie, cheat, and steal another election.
Moderator cut: off topic/trolling
If noting else it shows John Roberts and a federal judgeship are nothing but political appoints made by and for political hacks. One has to lobby for positions like that years ahead and sometimes years after for job security. Kissing butt, scmoozing, bribing, deal making what ever you want to call it if someone wind ups with a federal job at upper levels there were deals made by mulitple parties to get there.
A guy like Epstien not only facilitating sex legal and illegal also brings the power players and money people together. If his island is safe enough for obscene act it's 'safe' enough to conduct some business of the political kind.
If noting else it shows John Roberts and a federal judgeship are nothing but political appoints made by and for political hacks. One has to lobby for positions like that years ahead and sometimes years after for job security. Kissing butt, scmoozing, bribing, deal making what ever you want to call it if someone wind ups with a federal job at upper levels there were deals made by mulitple parties to get there.
A guy like Epstien not only facilitating sex legal and illegal also brings the power players and money people together. If his island is safe enough for obscene act it's 'safe' enough to conduct some business of the political kind.
Of course! EVERY high government official should resign immediately after some loose cannon Tweets some accusations because damn it!, they don't deserve the due process guaranteed by that damn piece of paper, AKA: The Constitution.
PolitiFact: "Viral photo, flight logs don't prove Chief Justice John Roberts visited Jeffrey Epstein's private island."
USAToday: " Fact Check: Ghislaine Maxwell, French modeling agent seen together in viral photo." It's not Roberts in the photo, it's French modeling agent Jean-Luc Brunel.
AP: "Photo does not show John Roberts with Ghislaine Maxwell." They are reporting the same as USA Today.
Newsweek: " Fact Check: Does Photo Show Chief Justice John Roberts on Jeffrey Epstein's Private Island?" There is no proof that Justice Roberts was on that island or plane.
Reuters: Fact Check: "Photo does not show John Roberts and Bill Clinton on Epstein's island."
So we have the gatewaypundit, a conspiracy driven propaganda source with a bad track record vs multiple sources that say it's not true. We have a Justice that sided with the rule of law and will not over turn an election and we have a desperate sore loser with a bar that is never too low to lie, cheat, and steal another election.
Moderator cut: off topic/trolling
I’m skeptical that Roberts was even involved with Epstein, but I can honestly tell you that every single source you quoted means absolutely nothing to me. Mainstream media, plus all the fake fact checkers, are compromised and they have zero credibility.
Last edited by Ibginnie; 12-26-2020 at 11:20 PM..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.