Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 01-08-2021, 05:03 PM
 
Location: MD
5,984 posts, read 3,458,081 times
Reputation: 4091

Advertisements

Lol, turned out Jack Dorsey was more powerful than the president after all.

 
Old 01-08-2021, 05:03 PM
 
761 posts, read 316,494 times
Reputation: 462
Trump used Twitter to become more powerful than Twitter.

He no longer needs them.

The campaign against Trump hasn’t ended — and as we see, even in “defeat” the world of human political energy still surrounds him.

He’s the chapped lip human existence can’t stop licking.
 
Old 01-08-2021, 05:03 PM
 
25,445 posts, read 9,809,749 times
Reputation: 15337
Quote:
Originally Posted by NorthDeKalb View Post
This week has been the equivalent of Powerball for liberals. Biden’s electoral certification, McConnell’s demotion, now Trump’s Twitter neutering.
Seriously though. And don't forget last Saturday's call with the GA SOS.
 
Old 01-08-2021, 05:03 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,294 posts, read 26,206,502 times
Reputation: 15645
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zymurgist View Post
Let me guess you want to ban anyone with a different opinion than you. Welcome to the new America under Biden and the Democrats.
There have been people banned from Twitter for far less than inciting a riot on the capital.
 
Old 01-08-2021, 05:05 PM
 
Location: League City
3,842 posts, read 8,270,957 times
Reputation: 5364
Quote:
Originally Posted by southernnaturelover View Post
I honestly don't know a single person that uses Twitter. Trump or no Trump.
Look up their revenue. A few people appear to like it.
 
Old 01-08-2021, 05:06 PM
 
1,812 posts, read 2,225,046 times
Reputation: 2466
Quote:
Originally Posted by tipsyguam View Post
One of the prime problems with section 230. It should apply to Twitter like any other publisher(which Twitter is, no matter how much they try to deny it).
If section 230 were removed, Trump would have had to have been banned long ago for lying and violent speech. That would make Twitter liable and responsible legally for his speech.

And removing 230 would make City-Data responsible for a lot of the stupidity on here. City-Data would likely just nuke the entire political forum. Too much trouble and no profit. Trump has no idea what 230 does.

Parler could NEVER exist without 230.
 
Old 01-08-2021, 05:06 PM
 
3,771 posts, read 1,524,054 times
Reputation: 2213
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJboutit View Post
Finally this should have happened 4 1/2 years ago
that would've probably helped his (trump's) cause.
 
Old 01-08-2021, 05:07 PM
 
Location: New York, NY
3,672 posts, read 2,751,519 times
Reputation: 4639
What a loser.
 
Old 01-08-2021, 05:07 PM
 
3,771 posts, read 1,524,054 times
Reputation: 2213
Quote:
Originally Posted by DorianRo View Post
Playings devils advocate, where did Trump or incite or say "Get violent people!!" Obviously he probably wants it but where did he specifically say it? My problem is, this can open a pandora's box of just banning all speech that people don't agree with.

These rioters/protests are GROWN ADULTS. They should know right from wrong by the time they are 40.
i don't disagree but this is a private platform so they can do as they please.
 
Old 01-08-2021, 05:10 PM
 
Location: Michigan
5,654 posts, read 6,219,394 times
Reputation: 8248
Quote:
Originally Posted by swake View Post
The 1st Amendment doesn't even apply to Twitter. Private company that can police their platform as they see fit.

People get very confused over what the 1st Amendment is and isn't. It protects you from the government stopping your legal speech, it does not protect lies, it does not protect creating riots, it does not protect you from consequences of your speech from companies or other individuals.

It certainly does not mean that others have to listen to you and take your QAnon crap seriously. And lastly, it doesn't keep others from mocking your stupid, off the wall nuts speech.
Yes, not I recognize that - the Bill of Rights has to do what the government is not permitted to restrict. I was rolling too many things together....the same speech that prompted Twitter to ban Trump is the sme speech that has the DC DA trying to detrmine whether Trump can face charges. And I'm also thinking of the posters here who keep saying he never expressly told anyone specifically to storm the Capitol.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:34 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top