Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-25-2021, 02:11 PM
 
Location: deafened by howls of 'racism!!!'
53,471 posts, read 35,179,344 times
Reputation: 29656

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Speegleagle View Post
Really?
Shoot first, ask questions later?
An unarmed female. Trained Law Enforcement.

I’m almost. 70. I wouldn’t fear any unarmed female unless she was some kind of super charged athlete , and even then….

“ significant threat “ is the standard.

Progressives are freaking out about finding a noose in a construction site , and you are saying shoot an unarmed white female because she crawled through a window.

What has happened to this country?
nutbag leftists. simple as that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-25-2021, 02:15 PM
 
Location: Atlanta, GA
14,831 posts, read 7,461,354 times
Reputation: 8966
Quote:
Originally Posted by crone View Post
And some misdemeanor crooks have been shot by cops without charges, arrests, trials or convictions.

Some cops allowed people entry. Some didn't, so the doors were beaten until entry was gained.

IMO, there was plenty that could have been done with the woman going through the broken window.There was no need to shoot her.
Unarmed white female lol. She was shot because she was a terrorist committing a violent act against the US government while disobeying the commands of a law enforcement officer while advancing toward him. She was the tip of the spear of a phalanx of terrorists advancing on the officer. Frankly, the fact he limited himself to a single shot showed remarkable restraint.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2021, 02:19 PM
 
17,273 posts, read 9,617,256 times
Reputation: 16468
Quote:
Originally Posted by atltechdude View Post
Unarmed white female lol. She was shot because she was a terrorist committing a violent act against the US government while disobeying the commands of a law enforcement officer while advancing toward him. She was the tip of the spear of a phalanx of terrorists advancing on the officer. Frankly, the fact he limited himself to a single shot showed remarkable restraint.
100% agree
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2021, 02:21 PM
 
929 posts, read 307,579 times
Reputation: 609
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feltdesigner View Post
anytime we see “but the real…” its a clear sign someone is lying.

storming the capitol isn’t terrorism.. THE REAL terrorism is defending the capitol and WH.
If you quote me, you could at least be accurate .

I didn’t use the word “ but”.However I understand your need to place it there.

Defending the Capitol and White House? What did Pelosi and the Dems do to address the assault on the White House from Lafayette Park and the burning of that Church? A “ commission” ? A “ committee” ?

Nope, just outrage about the POTUS carrying a bible the next day, and then carrying on with the lie about using tear gas to clear the “ peaceful protestors”.

Placing the casket of the deceased Capitol Police Officer out there , without even knowing the cause of death , after the NY Times and others went on and on about the lie of him being killed by a fire extinguisher.

Nancy doesn’t do anything except whatever helps Nancy keep her power intact. Lies, Propaganda, distortions, Dog and Pony Shows , that’s her game.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2021, 02:28 PM
 
929 posts, read 307,579 times
Reputation: 609
Quote:
Originally Posted by uggabugga View Post
nutbag leftists. simple as that.
It is true. I’ve tried to understand how it all has gone down. So much has changed. Even the language , the way some of these leftists speak. Tune in NPR and some of the alphabet channels for clarification.

And the Talk Shows? Surfing through the channels it is hard to hear some of them speak proper English, without all the reliance on certain words and the affective word output.

They pay those people on The View , and people watch it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2021, 02:34 PM
 
Location: Atlanta, GA
14,831 posts, read 7,461,354 times
Reputation: 8966
Quote:
Originally Posted by Artisan10 View Post
Insurrectionists? Terrorists? Hardly. Just more gaslighting.
Terrorism is the commission of illegal acts of violence to advance a political agenda. The Jan 6 attack certainly qualifies as terrorism under that definition.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2021, 02:48 PM
 
24,208 posts, read 15,276,309 times
Reputation: 13092
Quote:
Originally Posted by Speegleagle View Post
If you quote me, you could at least be accurate .

I didn’t use the word “ but”.However I understand your need to place it there.

Defending the Capitol and White House? What did Pelosi and the Dems do to address the assault on the White House from Lafayette Park and the burning of that Church? A “ commission” ? A “ committee” ?

Nope, just outrage about the POTUS carrying a bible the next day, and then carrying on with the lie about using tear gas to clear the “ peaceful protestors”.

Placing the casket of the deceased Capitol Police Officer out there , without even knowing the cause of death , after the NY Times and others went on and on about the lie of him being killed by a fire extinguisher.

Nancy doesn’t do anything except whatever helps Nancy keep her power intact. Lies, Propaganda, distortions, Dog and Pony Shows , that’s her game.
We all saw the fire extinguisher hit a couple of people. Too bad that cop was misidentified as one of them.

Having a stroke the next day could very well have been the result of what he was doing Jan 6. We will never know.

The congress has to depend on those police officers for their own security. It is clear that some of the cops have their own agendas.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2021, 03:10 PM
 
2,710 posts, read 1,049,938 times
Reputation: 1066
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feltdesigner View Post
lmao.. pointing out the people who stormed the capitol is gaslighting?

but defending the place with troops is.. wrong?
More spin. That's not at all what I said.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2021, 03:14 PM
 
2,710 posts, read 1,049,938 times
Reputation: 1066
Quote:
Originally Posted by atltechdude View Post
Terrorism is the commission of illegal acts of violence to advance a political agenda. The Jan 6 attack certainly qualifies as terrorism under that definition.
The agenda of the attack was to stop Arizona and other stats' presentation of election fraud to the Senate, so Pence would go ahead and certify biden. They accomplished exactly what they set out to do.

You would know that if you had been watching the hearing and livestreams of the "riot".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2021, 03:16 PM
 
Location: Atlanta, GA
14,831 posts, read 7,461,354 times
Reputation: 8966
Quote:
Originally Posted by Artisan10 View Post
The agenda of the attack was to stop Arizona and other stats' presentation of election fraud to the Senate, so Pence would go ahead and certify biden. They accomplished exactly what they set out to do.
No, those presentations continued and were voted on after Congress reassembled. And your lie is absurd, and is nothing more than a pathetic attempt to shift the blame for the attack to the left.

The purpose of the attack was to prevent Joe Biden’s certification as the 46th president.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:01 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top