Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-24-2021, 11:01 PM
 
Location: Stillwater, Oklahoma
30,976 posts, read 21,630,499 times
Reputation: 9676

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roboteer View Post
Democrats keep repeating "There's no evidence of election fraud!" Oh, really? How many examples would you like?

There are literally thousand of examples. Sworn testimony from eyewitnesses, affidavits sworn under penalty of perjury, videos, etc. etc.

This post could be hundreds of pages long. Here are just a few examples. You Democrats, how many such examples would it take to convince you? (A rhetorical questions, they would NEVER be convinced).

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketP...0Authority.pdf


....to provide just one example among hundreds.

As usual, liberals have claimed a "hand recount" of paper ballots (which were printed out after voting by the same voting machines under investigation, not by the voters) somehow cleared the Dominion voting machines.

* Does that mean that it is no longer true that records and logs are missing?

* Does it mean that the machines no longer put out wildly differing counts before and after a firmware upgrade?

* Does it mean that logs produced during the forensic analysis no longer showed that a section of code that deliberately weighed Biden votes differently from Trump votes was active and running during the election and subsequent counting?

They seem to be claiming that these things are somehow "no longer true". No explanation for this has been given.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

At State Farm Arena in Atlanta, GA on the day of the election, Surveillance video showed workers counting ballots with Republican and Democrat observers present.

At time tick 10:40 in the following video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Q9cSboHHS8 attorney Jacki Pick shows the video and narrates it.

At approx. 11:00PM, a woman with long blonde hair is seen talking to a number of the workers and observers. Shortly afterward, all the observers and most of the workers are seen turning and heading for the exit, except for four workers who stayed. Witnesses have described in sworn statements that the woman with long blonde hair had told everyone that everyone was quitting for the night and would resume ballot-counting etc. the following morning.

But the GA Secretary of State’s office later said that no one had told them they were quitting for the night, and that everyone should leave.

"We have launched an investigation into why the monitors from the political parties left before scanning ended," the secretary of state's office said. "While it was their right to leave early, we want to make certain they were not misled into thinking scanning had stopped for the night when it had not."
https://www.thecentersquare.com/geor...598f7c336.html

The Secretary of State’s representative making this statement was not sworn to tell the truth, unlike witnesses who WERE sworn and made statements saying they WERE told that everybody was to leave.

Atlanta election officials have since said that the videos show “normal ballot procedures”, as though counting ballots after sending the observers out of the room, in flat violation of Georgia law, was somehow “normal”.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rudy Giuliani gave a press conference on Nov. 19, 2020 in which he described various direct evidence of fraud. 60 different people swore out affidavits, under penalty of perjury, that they had volunteered to come to the ballot-counting rooms to observe the counting and tabulating of ballots; and that they had been physically prevented from doing so, in violation of state laws.

Fast forward this video to the 12:40 mark and listen to hear it.
https://www.c-span.org/video/?478246...plans-lawsuits

Giuliani also mentioned a woman in Michigan named Jessie Jacob whose job was to collect mail-in ballots, who signed a similar affidavit (again under penalty of perjury) that her supervisor had ordered her and the other employees to deliberately falsify the date on the mail-in ballots, to reflect an earlier date than the actual date they were mailed. Again in flat violation of Michigan state election law.
See the above video at 16:20 to hear about it.

Giuliani has dozens of other sworn affidavits from other employees, volunteers etc. describing illegal behavior with ballots. Being sworn before an office of the court, under threat of the penalty for perjury, these are all direct evidence of violations of election law and ballot fraud. Giuliani and the rest of Trump’s legal team are collecting more and more such evidence as time goes on.

So much for endless repetitions of "There isn't any evidence". You Democrats, how many such examples would it take to convince you? (A rhetorical questions, they would NEVER be convinced).

Leftists who keep insisting there is “no evidence of fraud or election lawbreaking”, are either astoundingly ignorant of the truth, or are aware of the truth and are lying to you, trying to fool you into believing there is none.
Then please explain why Sidney Powell in her defense of a lawsuit filed against her by Dominion said no reasonable person would believe that her accusations of massive vote fraud were actually true?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-24-2021, 11:05 PM
 
Location: Stillwater, Oklahoma
30,976 posts, read 21,630,499 times
Reputation: 9676
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
Well.................... an innocent man has nothing to fear. Obviously, the democrats are terrified, as they (as well as everyone else) knows they cheated in the 2020 presidential election.

The democrats will try anything in their power (legal or illegal) to stop the audit and reveal their crimes.

Democrats themselves do not care, as they do not believe in the rule of law or fair elections- only liberal policy. One must recognize that the democrats are so far gone that they do not share the same views as those who believe in democracy and individual rights, and thus we cannot continue to live with them.
So don't you quite strongly stand with Trump supporter Lyn Wood who recently declared that Trump did not lose the election and that he is still your president? As an advisory, at least one guest on the Alex Jones Show referred to Lyn Wood as being mentally disturbed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2021, 01:14 AM
 
Location: Stillwater, Oklahoma
30,976 posts, read 21,630,499 times
Reputation: 9676
Quote:
Originally Posted by StillwaterTownie View Post
Seriously, BOS2IAD, you as a Republican, wouldn't you want the court to put a stop to a vote audit or recount in which only Democrats would be doing it for an election in which a Republican just barely won?
Or do you have a report that Democrats are helping to operate the audit, because Arizona law requires all vote audits to be run bipartisan?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2021, 03:42 AM
 
Location: Metro Phoenix
11,039 posts, read 16,858,983 times
Reputation: 12950
If the AZ GOP wants to waste the resources doing this so they can appeal to the absolute stupidest of their constituents, so be it. Nothing will come of it. Trump lost because he sucked. That's all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2021, 04:55 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,262 posts, read 26,192,233 times
Reputation: 15636
Quote:
Originally Posted by BOS2IAD View Post
Oh really? Is there a statute of limitations when it comes to vote fraud?

You are really protesting when it comes to the Maricopa County audit. One would think that you were a Board of Supervisors member who is afraid of what might turn up.

You've been protesting against looking into fraud since the election ended. When you claim that nothing of the sort happened, all you are doing is showing that you are terrified. If you were so sure that nothing happened, then you would sit back and calmly watch how things play out.
Maricopa county already had two audits, will there be a third, a fourth.


Quote:
Originally Posted by michiganmoon View Post
I've been on record saying that I have seen no evidence that a single state had been flipped due to fraud, let alone enough states to change the outcome.


Since me pointing out obvious Democrat hypocrisy slipped by you, I will point it out again.

As asinine as Trump has been with wild claims, Democrats have matched it with Russia hoax claims and refusing to allow any thorough investigation into election fraud like in Arizona here.

You can't demand that everyone accept the results of the election as being fair and open while simultaneously blocking investigations from happening into alleged fraud.

Also it is hypocrisy since polling indicates that a majority of Democrats think Russia changed vote totals in 2016's election with no evidence and it was carried on for years. Now you insist 6 months is too long when the shoe is on the other foot.


"Republicans have too many conspiracy theories. Probably because Trump was groomed by the Soviets since the 1980s and they could black mail him with pee tapes and dirty money! " -Democrats that think they aren't Blue Anon hypocrites
Russia was completely different they did attempt to steer our election and national intelligence agencies confirmed that was the case including the senate intelligence committee. Did any investigative body indicate there was fraud in Arizona, why did they need a third audit.

No that is not hypocrisy because in one case you have actual facts while the other you have absolutely nothing.

Last edited by Goodnight; 04-25-2021 at 05:20 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2021, 08:35 AM
 
27,131 posts, read 15,310,658 times
Reputation: 12068
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Maricopa county already had two audits, will there be a third, a fourth.




Russia was completely different they did attempt to steer our election and national intelligence agencies confirmed that was the case including the senate intelligence committee. Did any investigative body indicate there was fraud in Arizona, why did they need a third audit.

No that is not hypocrisy because in one case you have actual facts while the other you have absolutely nothing.
Yet none of it was tied to Trump whatsoever so we have to assume you support the hoax upon the American People and the false persecution of a sitting President.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2021, 09:01 AM
 
Location: Texas
37,949 posts, read 17,859,151 times
Reputation: 10371
Quote:
Originally Posted by StillwaterTownie View Post
Then please explain why Sidney Powell in her defense of a lawsuit filed against her by Dominion said no reasonable person would believe that her accusations of massive vote fraud were actually true?
Please explain why, after quoting that post, you did not respond to anything specifically in that post. What are you afraid of?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2021, 09:08 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,262 posts, read 26,192,233 times
Reputation: 15636
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
Please explain why, after quoting that post, you did not respond to anything specifically in that post. What are you afraid of?
The CEO of Cyber Monkey is a partisan hack and has tweeted many conspiracy theories about the election, his company is doing the audit. OAN is find raising for the recount which will cost millions. No idea who is watching over the ballots for security.

This is not an independent audit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2021, 09:11 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,262 posts, read 26,192,233 times
Reputation: 15636
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluesjuke View Post
Yet none of it was tied to Trump whatsoever so we have to assume you support the hoax upon the American People and the false persecution of a sitting President.
There was certainly enough reason to generate an investigation, just because Trump wasn’t convicted doesn’t mean it was a hoax.

So what exactly is the reason for this audit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2021, 09:15 AM
 
5,979 posts, read 2,234,421 times
Reputation: 4612
So has anyone posted or identified what the security issues cited in the suit were?
Are we just blindly commenting here without any info?

9 pages and no context.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top