Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-07-2021, 08:20 AM
 
Location: minnesota
15,862 posts, read 6,331,057 times
Reputation: 5059

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by rstevens62 View Post
So, there are NO citizens willing to defend their own city? Surely there are plenty of people licensed to carry firearms in that city...where are they when their city needs them? (do they expect someone else to do it for them?)
What could go wrong?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-07-2021, 08:20 AM
 
26,660 posts, read 13,753,600 times
Reputation: 19118
I can’t believe they continue to be allowed to do this kind of thing. It escalates constantly. They all need to go to jail.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2021, 08:40 AM
 
3,044 posts, read 5,003,080 times
Reputation: 3324
Quote:
Originally Posted by rstevens62 View Post
So, there are NO citizens willing to defend their own city? Surely there are plenty of people licensed to carry firearms in that city...where are they when their city needs them? (do they expect someone else to do it for them?)
Again with your idiotic strawman of the CCW vigilante. Who would risk their freedom, their reputation (which will surely be abused by the media), and the ensuing civil litigation if they take matters in to their own hands? Why should any CCW stand up for anyone else?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2021, 11:00 AM
 
28,122 posts, read 12,608,522 times
Reputation: 15341
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnytang24 View Post
Again with your idiotic strawman of the CCW vigilante. Who would risk their freedom, their reputation (which will surely be abused by the media), and the ensuing civil litigation if they take matters in to their own hands? Why should any CCW stand up for anyone else?
LOL, why would they even go to the trouble of obtaining a CCW if they were not willing to use the weapon for defense? Is it SOLELY for their own personal protection?! (Ive heard plenty of times where a CCW carrying, happens to be in a store that is held up and they are able to peacefully resolve the situation, and get police on the way).


You made my point actually, RARELY, if ever is anyone willing to risk their freedom or quality of life, in defense of something they consider important, (like ones own city for instance). They expect police to do that for them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2021, 12:31 PM
 
45,233 posts, read 26,457,645 times
Reputation: 24993
People may be a little gun shy after seeing what the couple in StLouis was put through for the crime of standing outside with guns on their own property.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2021, 12:48 PM
 
3,080 posts, read 3,266,345 times
Reputation: 2509
Quote:
Originally Posted by rstevens62 View Post
LOL, why would they even go to the trouble of obtaining a CCW if they were not willing to use the weapon for defense? Is it SOLELY for their own personal protection?! (Ive heard plenty of times where a CCW carrying, happens to be in a store that is held up and they are able to peacefully resolve the situation, and get police on the way).


You made my point actually, RARELY, if ever is anyone willing to risk their freedom or quality of life, in defense of something they consider important, (like ones own city for instance). They expect police to do that for them.
Not sure where you're going with this since you basically answered your own question. Just like the majority of other scenarios, folks are first and foremost wanting to prioritize themselves, their loved ones, others, overwhelmingly in that order. Risking yourself to save yourself or a loved one is a pretty obvious risk/reward calculation. Expanding that to random others or more vague notions of 'city' should be readily apparent as to why that risk/reward calculation would be fundamentally different.


Having a license to carry gives one the _opportunity_ to use lethal force by firearm in those situations that the carrier deems appropriate, within the context of the laws. It in no way assigns a _requirement_, nor a moral obligation to act in a particular way for a given scenario.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2021, 12:54 PM
 
Location: minnesota
15,862 posts, read 6,331,057 times
Reputation: 5059
Quote:
Originally Posted by rstevens62 View Post
LOL, why would they even go to the trouble of obtaining a CCW if they were not willing to use the weapon for defense? Is it SOLELY for their own personal protection?! (Ive heard plenty of times where a CCW carrying, happens to be in a store that is held up and they are able to peacefully resolve the situation, and get police on the way).


You made my point actually, RARELY, if ever is anyone willing to risk their freedom or quality of life, in defense of something they consider important, (like ones own city for instance). They expect police to do that for them.
Its not "oh hey, I got a gun lets use it". That's a last resort. If there is any possible way to resolve the situation that must be tried first.

This is why we need some sort of gun control.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2021, 12:58 PM
 
Location: deafened by howls of 'racism!!!'
52,697 posts, read 34,572,254 times
Reputation: 29289
Quote:
Originally Posted by snebarekim View Post
Armed militant leftist groups openly and publicly threatening private citizens who are simply trying to transit public roadways.

These are not protesters. This is a militia.

These idiot woketards are going to trigger something real ugly.

The idiot woketard governments in those cities are allowing this to brew.
not a chance in hell this will every be addressed, or even acknowledged, by democrats or their sycophantic msm groupies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2021, 01:01 PM
 
4,023 posts, read 1,443,477 times
Reputation: 3543
Quote:
Originally Posted by antinimby View Post
Not me. I don’t feel sorry for them at all. They vote heavily Democrat. They deserve every bit of this.
This. If you are conservative or moderate move out of that area. If you are police just let this stuff happen. Walk the other way. Eventually the woke will come for Democrats and maybe then democrat politicians will wake up and see their city destroyed and start enforcing laws. Again, if you are conservative, moderate or even classic liberal or police, move out and never look back.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2021, 05:39 PM
 
Location: in my imagination
13,608 posts, read 21,399,012 times
Reputation: 10112
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cape Cod Todd View Post
What a bunch of idiots. They blocked the street and pulled guns on the guy. That was dumb. What was really stupid is the driver stopped and got out again when the road ahead was clear. He deserved the smack down he got.



What are they even protesting?
Couple thing to unpack...

1 This why some states are proposing or adopting "anti riot" laws. It is one thing to protest peacefully without blocking and creating nuisance which everybody supports peaceful protest, but taking charge of streets or blocks or harassing people is another. Despite the left depicting these laws as "anti protest" no they are anti riot.

2 The man made a bad tactical decision when the video clearly shows the mob told him to leave and he had free access to leave the area but choose to stop and confront them again and pull a gun. Laws vary in self defense from state to state but he was no longer in fear of his life or being detained when he was able to drive off so had he got into a gun fight he probably would have been charged with murder or attempted murder. Also the fact that he let anger and frustration get the better of him by stopping once he was clear was a tactical mistake being he was out numbered.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:08 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top