Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The problem is that it's the other way around. All investigations continue to show that Democrat voter fraud is almost non-existent, but Republican vote suppression efforts are rampant.
I was just reminded of this when reading a story from a few years back:
A Pennsylvania county’s Election Day nightmare underscores voting machine concerns.
Vote totals in a Northampton County judge's race showed one candidate, Abe Kassis, a Democrat, had just 164 votes out of 55,000 ballots across more than 100 precincts. Some machines reported zero votes for him. In a county with the ability to vote for a straight-party ticket, one candidate's zero votes was a near statistical impossibility. Something had gone quite wrong...
With clearly faulty results in at least the judge's election, officials began counting the paper backup ballots generated by the same machines. The paper ballots showed Mr. Kassis winning narrowly, 26,142 to 25,137, over his opponent, the Republican Victor Scomillio.
I also enjoyed that when Tucker Carlson lyingly claimed that tons of dead people were voting, he mentioned exactly one name, and it turned out to be a widow voting legitimately under her married name.
All investigations continue to show that Democrat voter fraud is almost non-existent,
Are these lies? And are their references and links, lies?
---------------------------
You Democrats mewling "there was no cheating, no evidence of illegal behavior".... oh, really? How many examples would you like?
There are literally thousand of examples. Sworn testimony from eyewitnesses, affidavits sworn under penalty of perjury, videos, etc. etc.
This post could be hundreds of pages long. Here are just a few examples. You Democrats, how many such examples would it take to convince you? (A rhetorical questions, they would NEVER be convinced).
As usual, liberals have claimed a "hand recount" of paper ballots (which were printed out after voting by the same voting machines under investigation, not by the voters) somehow cleared the Dominion voting machines.
* Does that mean that it is no longer true that records and logs are missing?
* Does it mean that the machines no longer put out wildly differing counts before and after a firmware upgrade?
* Does it mean that logs produced during the forensic analysis no longer showed that a section of code that deliberately weighed Biden votes differently from Trump votes was active and running during the election and subsequent counting?
They seem to be claiming that these things are somehow "no longer true". No explanation for this has been given.
At State Farm Arena in Atlanta, GA on the day of the election, Surveillance video showed workers counting ballots with Republican and Democrat observers present.
At approx. 11:00PM, a woman with long blonde hair is seen talking to a number of the workers and observers. Shortly afterward, all the observers and most of the workers are seen turning and heading for the exit, except for four workers who stayed. Witnesses have described in sworn statements that the woman with long blonde hair had told everyone that everyone was quitting for the night and would resume ballot-counting etc. the following morning.
But the GA Secretary of State’s office later said that no one had told them they were quitting for the night, and that everyone should leave.
"We have launched an investigation into why the monitors from the political parties left before scanning ended," the secretary of state's office said. "While it was their right to leave early, we want to make certain they were not misled into thinking scanning had stopped for the night when it had not." https://www.thecentersquare.com/geor...598f7c336.html
The Secretary of State’s representative making this statement was not sworn to tell the truth, unlike witnesses who WERE sworn and made statements saying they WERE told that everybody was to leave.
Atlanta election officials have since said that the videos show “normal ballot procedures”, as though counting ballots after sending the observers out of the room, in flat violation of Georgia law, was somehow “normal”.
Rudy Giuliani gave a press conference on Nov. 19, 2020 in which he described various direct evidence of fraud. 60 different people swore out affidavits, under penalty of perjury, that they had volunteered to come to the ballot-counting rooms to observe the counting and tabulating of ballots; and that they had been physically prevented from doing so, in violation of state laws.
Giuliani also mentioned a woman in Michigan named Jessie Jacob whose job was to collect mail-in ballots, who signed a similar affidavit (again under penalty of perjury) that her supervisor had ordered her and the other employees to deliberately falsify the date on the mail-in ballots, to reflect an earlier date than the actual date they were mailed. Again in flat violation of Michigan state election law.
See the above video at 16:20 to hear about it.
Giuliani has dozens of other sworn affidavits from other employees, volunteers etc. describing illegal behavior with ballots. Being sworn before an office of the court, under threat of the penalty for perjury, these are all direct evidence of violations of election law and ballot fraud. Giuliani and the rest of Trump’s legal team are collecting more and more such evidence as time goes on.
So much for endless repetitions of "There isn't any evidence". You Democrats, how many such examples would it take to convince you? (A rhetorical question, they would NEVER be convinced).
Leftists who keep insisting there is “no evidence of fraud or election lawbreaking”, are either astoundingly ignorant of the truth, or are aware of the truth and are lying to you, trying to fool you into believing there is none.
Location: Somewhere gray and damp, close to the West Coast
20,955 posts, read 5,543,671 times
Reputation: 8559
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roboteer
Are these lies? And are their references and links, lies?
---------------------------
You Democrats mewling "there was no cheating, no evidence of illegal behavior".... oh, really? How many examples would you like?
There are literally thousand of examples. Sworn testimony from eyewitnesses, affidavits sworn under penalty of perjury, videos, etc. etc.
This post could be hundreds of pages long. Here are just a few examples. You Democrats, how many such examples would it take to convince you? (A rhetorical questions, they would NEVER be convinced).
As usual, liberals have claimed a "hand recount" of paper ballots (which were printed out after voting by the same voting machines under investigation, not by the voters) somehow cleared the Dominion voting machines.
* Does that mean that it is no longer true that records and logs are missing?
* Does it mean that the machines no longer put out wildly differing counts before and after a firmware upgrade?
* Does it mean that logs produced during the forensic analysis no longer showed that a section of code that deliberately weighed Biden votes differently from Trump votes was active and running during the election and subsequent counting?
They seem to be claiming that these things are somehow "no longer true". No explanation for this has been given.
At State Farm Arena in Atlanta, GA on the day of the election, Surveillance video showed workers counting ballots with Republican and Democrat observers present.
At approx. 11:00PM, a woman with long blonde hair is seen talking to a number of the workers and observers. Shortly afterward, all the observers and most of the workers are seen turning and heading for the exit, except for four workers who stayed. Witnesses have described in sworn statements that the woman with long blonde hair had told everyone that everyone was quitting for the night and would resume ballot-counting etc. the following morning.
But the GA Secretary of State’s office later said that no one had told them they were quitting for the night, and that everyone should leave.
"We have launched an investigation into why the monitors from the political parties left before scanning ended," the secretary of state's office said. "While it was their right to leave early, we want to make certain they were not misled into thinking scanning had stopped for the night when it had not." https://www.thecentersquare.com/geor...598f7c336.html
The Secretary of State’s representative making this statement was not sworn to tell the truth, unlike witnesses who WERE sworn and made statements saying they WERE told that everybody was to leave.
Atlanta election officials have since said that the videos show “normal ballot procedures”, as though counting ballots after sending the observers out of the room, in flat violation of Georgia law, was somehow “normal”.
Rudy Giuliani gave a press conference on Nov. 19, 2020 in which he described various direct evidence of fraud. 60 different people swore out affidavits, under penalty of perjury, that they had volunteered to come to the ballot-counting rooms to observe the counting and tabulating of ballots; and that they had been physically prevented from doing so, in violation of state laws.
Giuliani also mentioned a woman in Michigan named Jessie Jacob whose job was to collect mail-in ballots, who signed a similar affidavit (again under penalty of perjury) that her supervisor had ordered her and the other employees to deliberately falsify the date on the mail-in ballots, to reflect an earlier date than the actual date they were mailed. Again in flat violation of Michigan state election law.
See the above video at 16:20 to hear about it.
Giuliani has dozens of other sworn affidavits from other employees, volunteers etc. describing illegal behavior with ballots. Being sworn before an office of the court, under threat of the penalty for perjury, these are all direct evidence of violations of election law and ballot fraud. Giuliani and the rest of Trump’s legal team are collecting more and more such evidence as time goes on.
So much for endless repetitions of "There isn't any evidence". You Democrats, how many such examples would it take to convince you? (A rhetorical question, they would NEVER be convinced).
Leftists who keep insisting there is “no evidence of fraud or election lawbreaking”, are either astoundingly ignorant of the truth, or are aware of the truth and are lying to you, trying to fool you into believing there is none.
They lie. They know they lie and don't see anything wrong with lying. "By any means necessary".
The problem is that it's the other way around. All investigations continue to show that Democrat voter fraud is almost non-existent, but Republican vote suppression efforts are rampant.
I was just reminded of this when reading a story from a few years back:
A Pennsylvania county’s Election Day nightmare underscores voting machine concerns.
Vote totals in a Northampton County judge's race showed one candidate, Abe Kassis, a Democrat, had just 164 votes out of 55,000 ballots across more than 100 precincts. Some machines reported zero votes for him. In a county with the ability to vote for a straight-party ticket, one candidate's zero votes was a near statistical impossibility. Something had gone quite wrong...
With clearly faulty results in at least the judge's election, officials began counting the paper backup ballots generated by the same machines. The paper ballots showed Mr. Kassis winning narrowly, 26,142 to 25,137, over his opponent, the Republican Victor Scomillio.
I also enjoyed that when Tucker Carlson lyingly claimed that tons of dead people were voting, he mentioned exactly one name, and it turned out to be a widow voting legitimately under her married name.
Are these lies? And are their references and links, lies?
---------------------------
You Democrats mewling "there was no cheating, no evidence of illegal behavior".... oh, really? How many examples would you like?
There are literally thousand of examples. Sworn testimony from eyewitnesses, affidavits sworn under penalty of perjury, videos, etc. etc.
This post could be hundreds of pages long. Here are just a few examples. You Democrats, how many such examples would it take to convince you? (A rhetorical questions, they would NEVER be convinced).
As usual, liberals have claimed a "hand recount" of paper ballots (which were printed out after voting by the same voting machines under investigation, not by the voters) somehow cleared the Dominion voting machines.
* Does that mean that it is no longer true that records and logs are missing?
* Does it mean that the machines no longer put out wildly differing counts before and after a firmware upgrade?
* Does it mean that logs produced during the forensic analysis no longer showed that a section of code that deliberately weighed Biden votes differently from Trump votes was active and running during the election and subsequent counting?
They seem to be claiming that these things are somehow "no longer true". No explanation for this has been given.
At State Farm Arena in Atlanta, GA on the day of the election, Surveillance video showed workers counting ballots with Republican and Democrat observers present.
At approx. 11:00PM, a woman with long blonde hair is seen talking to a number of the workers and observers. Shortly afterward, all the observers and most of the workers are seen turning and heading for the exit, except for four workers who stayed. Witnesses have described in sworn statements that the woman with long blonde hair had told everyone that everyone was quitting for the night and would resume ballot-counting etc. the following morning.
But the GA Secretary of State’s office later said that no one had told them they were quitting for the night, and that everyone should leave.
"We have launched an investigation into why the monitors from the political parties left before scanning ended," the secretary of state's office said. "While it was their right to leave early, we want to make certain they were not misled into thinking scanning had stopped for the night when it had not." https://www.thecentersquare.com/geor...598f7c336.html
The Secretary of State’s representative making this statement was not sworn to tell the truth, unlike witnesses who WERE sworn and made statements saying they WERE told that everybody was to leave.
Atlanta election officials have since said that the videos show “normal ballot procedures”, as though counting ballots after sending the observers out of the room, in flat violation of Georgia law, was somehow “normal”.
Rudy Giuliani gave a press conference on Nov. 19, 2020 in which he described various direct evidence of fraud. 60 different people swore out affidavits, under penalty of perjury, that they had volunteered to come to the ballot-counting rooms to observe the counting and tabulating of ballots; and that they had been physically prevented from doing so, in violation of state laws.
Giuliani also mentioned a woman in Michigan named Jessie Jacob whose job was to collect mail-in ballots, who signed a similar affidavit (again under penalty of perjury) that her supervisor had ordered her and the other employees to deliberately falsify the date on the mail-in ballots, to reflect an earlier date than the actual date they were mailed. Again in flat violation of Michigan state election law.
See the above video at 16:20 to hear about it.
Giuliani has dozens of other sworn affidavits from other employees, volunteers etc. describing illegal behavior with ballots. Being sworn before an office of the court, under threat of the penalty for perjury, these are all direct evidence of violations of election law and ballot fraud. Giuliani and the rest of Trump’s legal team are collecting more and more such evidence as time goes on.
So much for endless repetitions of "There isn't any evidence". You Democrats, how many such examples would it take to convince you? (A rhetorical question, they would NEVER be convinced).
Leftists who keep insisting there is “no evidence of fraud or election lawbreaking”, are either astoundingly ignorant of the truth, or are aware of the truth and are lying to you, trying to fool you into believing there is none.
Yes yes, democrats are just perfect and superior in every way and are too pure to engage in any fraudulent activity. That is essentially what the OP is declaring
Case study: Hudson county, NJ where the dead still vote.
The problem is that it's the other way around. All investigations continue to show that Democrat voter fraud is almost non-existent, but Republican vote suppression efforts are rampant.
Republican voter suppression is almost non-existent. This is just another example of Dems redefining words to further their agenda. Requiring an ID to vote is not voter suppression - it's common sense. Issues like voter suppression and illegal immigration are red herrings designed by both political parties to distract the unwashed masses from noticing that our elected officials are not addressing real issues. They're pandering to low information voters who, unfortunately, now seem to be in the majority.
Republican voter suppression is almost non-existent. This is just another example of Dems redefining words to further their agenda. Requiring an ID to vote is not voter suppression - it's common sense. Issues like voter suppression and illegal immigration are red herrings designed by both political parties to distract the unwashed masses from noticing that our elected officials are not addressing real issues. They're pandering to low information voters who, unfortunately, now seem to be in the majority.
What amazes me about this whole 'voter fraud' fiasco is the people who insist on it being an R vs D thing. I don't care WHO is responsible, it needs to be fixed. Sick of hearing the 'it wouldn't have affected the outcome' argument. That's not the point!
The problem is that it's the other way around. All investigations continue to show that Democrat voter fraud is almost non-existent, but Republican vote suppression efforts are rampant.
I was just reminded of this when reading a story from a few years back:
A Pennsylvania county’s Election Day nightmare underscores voting machine concerns.
Vote totals in a Northampton County judge's race showed one candidate, Abe Kassis, a Democrat, had just 164 votes out of 55,000 ballots across more than 100 precincts. Some machines reported zero votes for him. In a county with the ability to vote for a straight-party ticket, one candidate's zero votes was a near statistical impossibility. Something had gone quite wrong...
With clearly faulty results in at least the judge's election, officials began counting the paper backup ballots generated by the same machines. The paper ballots showed Mr. Kassis winning narrowly, 26,142 to 25,137, over his opponent, the Republican Victor Scomillio.
I also enjoyed that when Tucker Carlson lyingly claimed that tons of dead people were voting, he mentioned exactly one name, and it turned out to be a widow voting legitimately under her married name.
" All investigations continue to show that Democrat voter fraud is almost non-existent"
As Warner Wolf used to say. "roll the tape"!
We HAVE the VIDEOS and over 100 SIGNED affidavits, under penalty of perjury, SIGNED.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
