Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It clearly seems that conditions at that camp need to be improved and the stays there expedited, however I’m still not convinced that the Trump policy of forcing unaccompanied children to remain in Mexico would have been a safer environment for these children.
Trumps policy would discouraged parents from sending their kids with smugglers from making a long dangerous trek if they know their kids won’t get in the US
Location: Somewhere gray and damp, close to the West Coast
20,955 posts, read 5,550,060 times
Reputation: 8559
Quote:
Originally Posted by atltechdude
It clearly seems that conditions at that camp need to be improved and the stays there expedited, however I’m still not convinced that the Trump policy of forcing unaccompanied children to remain in Mexico would have been a safer environment for these children.
Thus spake the human trafficking apologist, folks.
It clearly seems that conditions at that camp need to be improved and the stays there expedited, however I’m still not convinced that the Trump policy of forcing unaccompanied children to remain in Mexico would have been a safer environment for these children.
Their parents agreed as evidenced by the fact of far fewer them up this way when the policy was in effect. Then they were given the green light and the red carpet by the current administration. What you see in this video as the result of this policy shift is probably the NICEST part of their journey up here -- and this administration and their apologists DO. NOT. CARE. Grand-scale child abuse, rape, kidnapping, sold to drug cartels? Who cares, as long as we can import future Democrat voters!
You missed the point the link to "children in cages" provide from the OP is for the Washington Post...
When I click on it it's a Youtube video of the BBC report. Nothing to do with the Post at all.
Even if it was linked from the Post the BBC video report is still the BBC video report. What difference would it make where the link came from? The video is the real report.
It clearly seems that conditions at that camp need to be improved and the stays there expedited, however I’m still not convinced that the Trump policy of forcing unaccompanied children to remain in Mexico would have been a safer environment for these children.
They are accompanied in Mexico. They are not making the trip through Mexico on their own. They become unaccompanied only after they are in this country.
Biden separating children from their parents and all.
Status:
"Let this year be over..."
(set 26 days ago)
Location: Where my bills arrive
19,232 posts, read 17,105,490 times
Reputation: 15541
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC
You didn't answer my question.
Then i'll answer it now seeing you didn't get it the first time , I was pointing out the hypocrisy of posters who slam WaPA as the poster child for everything that's wrong with MSM but have no problem with using it when the article supports whatever position they are posting about same as I said in post #21 and you questioned in #29.
Status:
"Let this year be over..."
(set 26 days ago)
Location: Where my bills arrive
19,232 posts, read 17,105,490 times
Reputation: 15541
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephan A Smith
When I click on it it's a Youtube video of the BBC report. Nothing to do with the Post at all.
Even if it was linked from the Post the BBC video report is still the BBC video report. What difference would it make where the link came from? The video is the real report.
And my comment was about the link at the bottoms of the OP's post.....
Then i'll answer it now seeing you didn't get it the first time , I was pointing out the hypocrisy of posters who slam WaPA as the poster child for everything that's wrong with MSM but have no problem with using it when the article supports whatever position they are posting about same as I said in post #21 and you questioned in #29.
I completely understood what you said the first time you said it.
And I am asking you - since I get slammed for using "right-wing" sources, and now you are slamming me for using MSM sources - what sources do you suggest I use that would meet your compliance?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
