Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-21-2021, 03:20 PM
 
19,573 posts, read 8,530,761 times
Reputation: 10096

Advertisements

This is arguably unethical. Why would the CDC want to hide and cover up information like this? Leave the kids alone, for crying out loud. I get it that you people believe that your political control agenda is more important than anyone or anything, everyone or everything. But - brace yourselves - it isn't.

Quote:
CDC buries study finding that student masking has 'No statistically significant benefit'

Less than three months ago, the Centers for Disease Control published a mostly-ignored, large-scale study of Covid-19 transmission in US schools which concluded that while masking then-unvaccinated teachers and improving ventilation was associated with lower levels of virus transmission in schools - social distancing, classroom barriers, HEPA filters, and forcing students to wear masks did not result in a statistically significant benefit.

According to the report, scientists believe that the CDC's decision to intentionally omit the findings on student masking from a summary of the study amounts to "file drawering" the findings - the practice of burying studies that don't have statistically significant results.

"That a masking requirement of students failed to show independent benefit is a finding of consequence and great interest," according to Vinay Prasad, an associate professor in University of California, San Francisco’s Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics. "It should have been included in the summary."

Epidemiologist Tracy Hoeg, author of a different CDC study on Covid-19 transmission in schools said that "The summary gives the impression that only masking of staff was studied," adding "when in reality there was this additional important detection about a student-masking requirement not having a statistical impact."

{More at the link}
They are trying to push the narrative that everyone needs to be masked, apparently forever, as this virus is not going away, and there will always be at least one person somewhere who has not been exposed to it yet. The apparent reason for this is so that they can scare everyone by constantly forcing them to be reminded of the virus everywhere they go, with no reprieve from that - ever.

These mask mandates give a sense of power and control to the people issuing and enforcing the mandates, but as we can currently see, states that eagerly impose these sorts of mandates are having the same types of spread of the virus as those that do not - and in many cases it has been even worse in the states with the comprehensive mask mandates. They do not work, and in many cases may actually cause more harm than help.

Here is a link to the actual study that contains these very important scientific findings that the authoritarian CDC "experts" selectively and based on politics, decided to hide, cover up and ignore.

More studies that conclude that masks provide minimal to no protection are below:
  1. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1...85v1.full-text
  2. https://swprs.org/face-masks-evidence/
  3. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29395560/
  4. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32590322/
  5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15340662/
  6. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26579222/
  7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31159777/
  8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4420971/
  9. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1....01.20049528v1
  10. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1....30.20047217v2
  11. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2006372
  12. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jam...rticle/2749214
  13. https://www.cmaj.ca/content/188/8/567
  14. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5779801/
  15. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19216002/
  16. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4420971/
  17. https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/65/11/1934/4068747
  18. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article.../_pdf/-char/en
  19. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01658736
  20. https://www.journalofhospitalinfecti...pdf90148-2/pdf)
  21. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/art...01509-0009.pdf
  22. https://web.archive.org/web/20200717...sed-sound-data
  23. https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25776/ra...c-april-8-2020
  24. https://www.nap.edu/read/25776/chapter/1#6
  25. https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/5/19-0994_article
  26. https://academic.oup.com/annweh/article/54/7/789/202744
  27. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6599448/
  28. https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M20-1342
  29. https://link.springer.com/article/10...92-020-01704-y
  30. https://clinmedjournals.org/articles...0.php?jid=jide
  31. https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...30147308702355

The monsters pushing this anti-science agenda, especially as it applies to children, should be caged. Agreed?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-21-2021, 03:32 PM
 
Location: Lone Mountain Las Vegas NV
18,058 posts, read 10,366,600 times
Reputation: 8828
There was a large study done by the UAB that heavily supports masking adults and children including real school data...

https://www.uab.edu/news/health/item...ad-of-covid-19

So apparently there are sources for both sides of the masking discussions. But I would also note having had a whole mess of exposure to the medical institutions in the last couple of months that virtually all have tight masking.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2021, 03:34 PM
 
7,977 posts, read 4,992,785 times
Reputation: 15956
Of course not, I can't believe people were foolish enough to believe a snot rag or Diaper around their nose and mouth was going to stop a virus.. Its unreal how many DUMB americans there are now
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2021, 03:35 PM
 
19,573 posts, read 8,530,761 times
Reputation: 10096
Quote:
Originally Posted by pleens View Post
I agree but what are we supposed to do???
Shame them with their constant lies and manipulative deceptions until they are removed from power.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2021, 03:38 PM
 
Location: Oklahoma
17,816 posts, read 13,719,426 times
Reputation: 17860
Quote:
Originally Posted by lvmensch View Post
There was a large study done by the UAB that heavily supports masking adults and children including real school data...

https://www.uab.edu/news/health/item...ad-of-covid-19
Dude, the OP's studies lead author is a Vet. You expect me to believe a study done by an M.D. who is a fellow in Infectious Disease studies over a Veterinarian??
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2021, 03:48 PM
 
19,573 posts, read 8,530,761 times
Reputation: 10096
Quote:
Originally Posted by eddie gein View Post
Dude, the OP's studies lead author is a Vet. You expect me to believe a study done by an M.D. who is a fellow in Infectious Disease studies over a Veterinarian??
Here are the names and titles of the doctors involved in this study, which lncludes a number of MD's:

Jenna Gettings, DVM; Michaila Czarnik, MPH; Elana Morris, MPH; Elizabeth Haller, MEd; Angela M. Thompson-Paul, PhD; Catherine Rasberry, PhD; Tatiana M. Lanzieri, MD; Jennifer Smith-Grant, MSPH; Tiffiany Michelle Aholou, PhD; Ebony Thomas, MPH; Cherie Drenzek, DVM; Duncan MacKellar, DrPH (View author affiliations)

And again, here is a link to the actual study that contains these very important scientific findings that the authoritarian CDC "experts" selectively and based on politics, decided to hide, cover up and ignore.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2021, 03:58 PM
 
Location: Lone Mountain Las Vegas NV
18,058 posts, read 10,366,600 times
Reputation: 8828
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartacus713 View Post
Here are the names and titles of the doctors involved in this study, which lncludes a number of MD's:

Jenna Gettings, DVM; Michaila Czarnik, MPH; Elana Morris, MPH; Elizabeth Haller, MEd; Angela M. Thompson-Paul, PhD; Catherine Rasberry, PhD; Tatiana M. Lanzieri, MD; Jennifer Smith-Grant, MSPH; Tiffiany Michelle Aholou, PhD; Ebony Thomas, MPH; Cherie Drenzek, DVM; Duncan MacKellar, DrPH (View author affiliations)

And again, here is a link to the actual study that contains these very important scientific findings that the authoritarian CDC "experts" selectively and based on politics, decided to hide, cover up and ignore.
Those appear to be mostly academicians not doctors and no particular skill set that would obviously apply to the study.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2021, 03:58 PM
 
8,247 posts, read 3,502,315 times
Reputation: 5697
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartacus713 View Post
Shame them with their constant lies and manipulative deceptions until they are removed from power.
People like that have no shame. They lie without a care. Right and wrong is fluid with their kind. There is no moral compass.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2021, 04:00 PM
 
19,573 posts, read 8,530,761 times
Reputation: 10096
Quote:
Originally Posted by lvmensch View Post
Those appear to be mostly academicians not doctors and no particular skill set that would obviously apply to the study.
Could you people be any more full of crap? I seriously doubt it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2021, 04:03 PM
 
19,573 posts, read 8,530,761 times
Reputation: 10096
Quote:
Originally Posted by pleens View Post
I dont think its a tradiational virus,its exposure to 5G ultra wideband crap and they know it!!!

THEY CREATED A FAKE VIRUS TO HIDE THE FACT ITS REALLY 5G DOING THIS!!! (So people dont contest it being used)

Funnty how this is happening in alot of schools now isnt it??

MOST SCHOOLS HAVE 5G ULTRA WIDEBAND NOW!!!!!
Johnnyma, you are losing your composure, with the 5g stuff.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:19 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top