Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-06-2021, 07:30 AM
 
Location: Sector 001
15,946 posts, read 12,290,309 times
Reputation: 16109

Advertisements

Hillary is a swamp member, which I suppose is not as bad as being part of woke culture or a closet marxist allowing the extreme left to run things, or having dementia and not know what you are even signing but just being told to sign it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-06-2021, 07:34 AM
 
Location: Just over the horizon
18,461 posts, read 7,092,496 times
Reputation: 11707
Quote:
Originally Posted by skeddy View Post
Would Clinton would be a unifying force in the Democratic party in 2024?

Maybe not the most likable, but she can position herself as their only option. She is an older, more experienced candidate, having ran twice, and flat-out won the popular vote the last time. She is younger than Trump.


You want the Trump again?

Because that's how you get the Trump again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2021, 08:42 AM
 
Location: new yawk zoo
8,695 posts, read 11,084,011 times
Reputation: 6380
we could use some new Hillary memes for kicks
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2021, 08:44 AM
 
Location: Suburb of Chicago
31,848 posts, read 17,615,406 times
Reputation: 29385
Quote:
Originally Posted by swagger View Post
The Democrats have NOBODY.

Biden will not be president for four years. That isn't going to happen. 25A, resignation, whatever, he's not going to last that long.

Harris will replace him. Nobody likes Harris. Harris couldn't even get a decent turnout in her own state during the primary. I think she only had a single digit percentage of the vote - in her own state. She also wasn't ever elected to that position and people, I think, really, really don't want her there.

That leaves the Democrats with.... nobody. They have no bright light in the party. No Obama-speech-at-the-DNC kind of person to put out there. And it's been made exceptionally clear over the past five years that they're not going to allow a non-establishment player to lead the team. There will be no Democrat version of Trump that pops up and takes the reins.

There will be somebody on the '24 Democrat ticket, but that somebody will be a nobody. Republicans are going to win on name recognition alone.
The Democrats have Tulsi Gabbard, but she won't play along with the war hawks, so they won't do anything but try and discredit her.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2021, 08:45 AM
 
Location: Florida
10,461 posts, read 4,042,712 times
Reputation: 8483
Quote:
Originally Posted by swagger View Post
The Democrats have NOBODY.

Biden will not be president for four years. That isn't going to happen. 25A, resignation, whatever, he's not going to last that long.

Harris will replace him. Nobody likes Harris. Harris couldn't even get a decent turnout in her own state during the primary. I think she only had a single digit percentage of the vote - in her own state. She also wasn't ever elected to that position and people, I think, really, really don't want her there.

That leaves the Democrats with.... nobody. They have no bright light in the party. No Obama-speech-at-the-DNC kind of person to put out there. And it's been made exceptionally clear over the past five years that they're not going to allow a non-establishment player to lead the team. There will be no Democrat version of Trump that pops up and takes the reins.

There will be somebody on the '24 Democrat ticket, but that somebody will be a nobody. Republicans are going to win on name recognition alone.
Yep, it's why they had to get help from the CIA and the FBI along with China in creating and weaponizing the Covid Virus so they could get mail in voting and use it to rig the elections.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2021, 08:47 AM
 
30,065 posts, read 18,670,668 times
Reputation: 20884
Quote:
Originally Posted by MPowering1 View Post
The Democrats have Tulsi Gabbard, but she won't play along with the war hawks, so they won't do anything but try and discredit her.
Tulsi Gabbard has too much common sense for the democrats.

There is no way in hell that the dems would ever put her up for nomination; the dems prefer candidates who are corrupt and crazy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2021, 08:49 AM
 
Location: Suburb of Chicago
31,848 posts, read 17,615,406 times
Reputation: 29385
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
Tulsi Gabbard has too much common sense for the democrats.

There is no way in hell that the dems would ever put her up for nomination; the dems prefer candidates who are corrupt and crazy.

Sad, but true. And that's why I'm no longer a Democrat.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2021, 08:50 AM
 
Location: Tyler, TX
23,861 posts, read 24,115,793 times
Reputation: 15135
Quote:
Originally Posted by MPowering1 View Post
The Democrats have Tulsi Gabbard, but she won't play along with the war hawks, so they won't do anything but try and discredit her.
They don't really have her, then, if she's not an option.

That they didn't embrace this young, vibrant, pretty populist is placing a spotlight on their corruption. They effectively shunned her from the party, and the reasons are apparent to anyone paying attention.

All politicians are corrupt at some level, and parties certainly look out for their own interests, but the transformation of the Democrat party we've witnessed over the past several years is nothing short of stunning.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2021, 08:53 AM
 
Location: USA
2,871 posts, read 1,150,567 times
Reputation: 6482
Yes, she should run, all right.
Not for public office, but to benefit her health. She's big as a barn.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2021, 08:54 AM
 
Location: Planet Telex
5,900 posts, read 3,901,723 times
Reputation: 5857
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
Tulsi Gabbard has too much common sense for the democrats.

There is no way in hell that the dems would ever put her up for nomination; the dems prefer candidates who are corrupt and crazy.
Tulsi has "too much common sense for the Democrats" yet she advocates for making four-year colleges tuition free, the Green New Deal, federal funding for abortion, and a single-payer health care system. In other words, someone who is even more extreme than Hillary and Joe Biden sounds a lot like the sort of "non-crazy" politician you'd vote for.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:51 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top