Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
A few people have tried to use Jacobson v. Massachusetts (1905) as an excuse for Biden's handlers to impose a vaccine mandate on 100,000,000 Americans.
But Jacobson v. Massachusetts was a case about STATE government having the authority to mandate vaccines, not the Fed govt.
In fact, the Constitution never mentions a word about the Fed govt having any authority to mandate vaccines. And the 10th amendment says that if the Constitution doesn't give the Fed govt the power to do something, the Fed can't do it, but "the states and the people" still can if they want to.
Has any federal court ruled it is UNconstitutional, or would this be a case of first impression? Not being argumentative here, I am genuinely wondering.
He is just doing this for show. Nobody takes him seriously about anything. I bet he already forgot everything he said anyway
Not that it matters as myself and my entire family, wife, kids, parents, uncles, aunts, etc are not getting vaccinated. There is nothing joey can do about it
A few people have tried to use Jacobson v. Massachusetts (1905) as an excuse for Biden's handlers to impose a vaccine mandate on 100,000,000 Americans.
But Jacobson v. Massachusetts was a case about STATE government having the authority to mandate vaccines, not the Fed govt.
In fact, the Constitution never mentions a word about the Fed govt having any authority to mandate vaccines. And the 10th amendment says that if the Constitution doesn't give the Fed govt the power to do something, the Fed can't do it, but "the states and the people" still can if they want to.
Life will be miserable for those that do not get vaxxed......fired from your job, health ins will sky rocket.....so you will be forced to vaxx otherwise, you will not be able to support yourself or family.
it is unconstitutional BUT the constitution has been violated countless times so we cannot count on the courts, judges do whatever they want and may underlie Bidens pressure, any outcome is possible
and don't forget: nothing in this world prevents the courts from being corrupt and the Biden lobby will try to buy anyone they can !!!
A few people have tried to use Jacobson v. Massachusetts (1905) as an excuse for Biden's handlers to impose a vaccine mandate on 100,000,000 Americans.
But Jacobson v. Massachusetts was a case about STATE government having the authority to mandate vaccines, not the Fed govt.
In fact, the Constitution never mentions a word about the Fed govt having any authority to mandate vaccines. And the 10th amendment says that if the Constitution doesn't give the Fed govt the power to do something, the Fed can't do it, but "the states and the people" still can if they want to.
Sorry, Joe, you lose.
The truth is that Jacobson is outdated anyway. The same people that wrote that decision wrote later in favor of forced sterilization of poor people to avoid generations of imbeciles.
Want to be associated with that?
For the last 80 years the law has been moving toward the right of privacy (that is what Roe is based on) and right right to bodily integrity.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
