Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-23-2021, 07:11 AM
 
Location: Bronx, New York
4,437 posts, read 7,674,904 times
Reputation: 2054

Advertisements

I've learned that the FBI/Justice Dept is going after folk who target and conspire to attack school board members. And that the National School Board Association requested it. Board members, across the country, are being threatened!

Posts like these are not only incorrect, but disingenuous!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-23-2021, 07:32 AM
 
Location: Corona del Mar, CA - Coronado, CA
4,477 posts, read 3,301,369 times
Reputation: 5609
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Any parent has a say, they can voice their concerns and recommend changes but they don't get to threaten board members.
That isn't what you said, you said, "and those school board members were elected by a majority, a very vocal minority of parents doesn’t get to change policy."

And yet schools all over this nation have had MANY policies changed precisely because of a very vocal minority of parents, maybe only one or two, and over the wishes of the majority that elected the school board.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Please name one school district and a specific change that has been recommended and went unaddressed, and I do mean specific so don't tell me "no more CRT".
What does "unaddressed" mean? Is that where the school board president nods and says, "thank you for your input" and then the board does what they want anyway? Is that "addressing" the issue?

The Loudoun School Board (VA) transgender policy clearly did not have majority support from the voters, and yet the LSB passed it. Is that addressing the concerns of parents?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2021, 11:43 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,294 posts, read 26,206,502 times
Reputation: 15645
Quote:
Originally Posted by TimTheEnchanter View Post
That isn't what you said, you said, "and those school board members were elected by a majority, a very vocal minority of parents doesn’t get to change policy."

And yet schools all over this nation have had MANY policies changed precisely because of a very vocal minority of parents, maybe only one or two, and over the wishes of the majority that elected the school board.
They don't get to change policy unilaterally, they may be unhappy with a policy but the school board members have the final say. Yes schools have changed policy after considering input from parents, school dress codes, adding advance placement classes, I don't see constructive debate from many of these people.

Quote:
What does "unaddressed" mean? Is that where the school board president nods and says, "thank you for your input" and then the board does what they want anyway? Is that "addressing" the issue?

The Loudoun School Board (VA) transgender policy clearly did not have majority support from the voters, and yet the LSB passed it. Is that addressing the concerns of parents?
School boards are very respectful to parents after all they are also parents. They usually indicate they will take more complicated suggestions and come to an agreement.

Transgender policy is set at the state level, it's up to the schools to accommodate, I don't see that the parents voted on the policy which passed the board 7-2 with before a small number of parents. Regardless they need to accommodate these students, did parents propose spending money on the construction of separate locker rooms and bathrooms
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2022, 07:16 AM
 
Location: deafened by howls of 'racism!!!'
52,697 posts, read 34,564,185 times
Reputation: 29289
merrick, you lying sack...


When Attorney General Merrick Garland’s goon squad came for parents
Quote:
Last fall, Attorney General Merrick Garland testified before the House Judiciary Committee that the Federal Bureau of Investigation was not using counterterrorism statutes to investigate parents who were exercising their First Amendment rights at local school board meetings.

Last week, the House Judiciary Committee produced evidence that Garland's FBI was doing just that.

“Like you, I can’t imagine any circumstance in which the PATRIOT Act would be used in the circumstances of parents complaining about their children, nor can I imagine a circumstance where they would be labeled as domestic terrorism,” Garland told the committee last October.

Now, ranking member Jim Jordan (R-OH) has identified three separate instances in which counterterrorism statutes were indeed used to open investigations into parents whose only crime was speaking at a public event about their local school. Jordan claims that a whistleblower has identified dozens of other similar cases.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2022, 04:55 PM
 
Location: deafened by howls of 'racism!!!'
52,697 posts, read 34,564,185 times
Reputation: 29289
another shoe drops

Report confirms White House had advance knowledge of the NSBA's 'domestic terrorism' letter and promised 'we have your back'
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:32 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top