Censorship in Science (state, claims, pay, official)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It’s sad that our most prestigious medical journals are no longer a place for scientific debate but for submission to orthodoxy.
I don't see what research is actually being blocked. Malone was one of many scientists that were part of the development of mRNA vaccines yet here he is claiming that Pfizer and Moderna vaccines might make COVID-19 infections worse. Based on what research.
I see he claimed his IP address was blocked from reading the New England Journal of Medicine which is weird, never heard a magazine blocking an IP for read only.
Good topic. Some of the worlds most well known virologists were marginalized just for questioning the lockdowns. It started early. A few questioned why perfectly heathy people were forced to quarantine when it has never been done in the past. It should have been limited to the symptomatic and compromised or elderly populations.
One virologist from France Dr. Perronne who was tops in his field since the 90's and a vaccine policy chief was fired over these types of statements.
I don't see what research is actually being blocked. Malone was one of many scientists that were part of the development of mRNA vaccines yet here he is claiming that Pfizer and Moderna vaccines might make COVID-19 infections worse. Based on what research.
I see he claimed his IP address was blocked from reading the New England Journal of Medicine which is weird, never heard a magazine blocking an IP for read only.
What research is being blocked.
Neither have I , but he has posted a screenshot for all those to see. Has NEJM denied?
I haven’t followed all of Malone’s arguments so I cannot speak to them. I caught a video of him citing some study showing higher viral loads in the nasal mucosa membranes of vaccinated vs unvaccinated as evidence of ADE. I disagree since the acronym features “Disease Enhancement” and viral loads are not a good indicator of disease severity. But perhaps he’s concerned this is an “inflection point” so to speak.
Either way, science is about free debate. Marginal ideas ridiculed become accepted all the time. Once you lose free debate, you lose science.
This is the tip of the iceberg. What’s more concerning is scientists (Bridle) and doctors (McCollough) losing their positions and titles due to them questioning the medicines. This sends a stifling signal to any scientist wanting to question these vaccines but worried about their career at the same time. We all are worse off as a result.
Neither have I , but he has posted a screenshot for all those to see. Has NEJM denied?
I haven’t followed all of Malone’s arguments so I cannot speak to them. I caught a video of him citing some study showing higher viral loads in the nasal mucosa membranes of vaccinated vs unvaccinated as evidence of ADE. I disagree since the acronym features “Disease Enhancement” and viral loads are not a good indicator of disease severity. But perhaps he’s concerned this is an “inflection point” so to speak.
Either way, science is about free debate. Marginal ideas ridiculed become accepted all the time. Once you lose free debate, you lose science.
This is the tip of the iceberg. What’s more concerning is scientists (Bridle) and doctors (McCollough) losing their positions and titles due to them questioning the medicines. This sends a stifling signal to any scientist wanting to question these vaccines but worried about their career at the same time. We all are worse off as a result.
I see no indication that his research is being blocked and if his claim is true regarding Covid-19 vaccines then he should be able to produce a peer reviewed research paper, not a video. He can question vaccines but he needs to back it up, claims that he is blocked from reading NEJM just feeds his conspiracy and even if true does not prevent hi, from reading in other ways.
Again, if it sounds fishy, it probably is. The doctor does not say NEJM censored him. he claims they blocked him from even reading the journal. That just makes no sense. I suspect it either a mistake, or related to some other problem with his IP address, or some other infraction like copyright infringement.
The left is irrational, immoral and quite possibly insane. Follow its science at your own peril and regard anything it puts forward with deep suspicion.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
