Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-13-2021, 12:47 PM
 
Location: Southeast US
8,609 posts, read 2,308,762 times
Reputation: 2114

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by hooligan View Post
No, it simply isn't. There are tons of not "rich" people that live in high SALT locations. It's actually a pretty crappy way to tax the "rich". It does nothing to address "rich" people in lower SALT locations and it increases the burden on non-"rich" people in high SALT locations.
it's a simple way because it essentially says "every taxpayer is eligible for the same amount of a deduction". The vast majority of people don't even itemize - ~87% - which means the SALT doesn't even matter to them (from a tax rate; their taxes aren't affected).

You're aware that the rich, despite the cries of the media and their <10% cut (from 39.6% to 37%), paid MORE in taxes despite that cut right?

I'm trying to deal in facts, which are hard to come by from the Government.

Here's the best breakdown for numbers I have seen:

https://taxfoundation.org/summary-of...a-2020-update/

you will see the top 10% of earners, at a TAXABLE income threshold of $145K, filed 14MM tax returns. So, 11MM is slightly above $145K, but surely a few < $145K were caught by the SALT limit.

I've acknowledged that the amount could/should be adjusted so far fewer (as close to 100% as you can get) "non-rich" people are losing part of their deduction. Whether that # is $15K or $20K - it's obvious it's closer to $10K than $80K. If it wasn't, the number would be much higher than ~7% (11MM) of personal tax returns.

But like it or not, the top 5% of earners will always be "rich". That threshold is $208K of taxable income.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-13-2021, 01:04 PM
 
9,509 posts, read 4,342,349 times
Reputation: 10585
The left loves to say that the rich don't pay their fair share of taxes based on smaller percentages, even though they pay more in absolute dollars. Now they're complaining that the rich will get a bigger benefit from the SALT deduction based on absolute dollars. I guess whatever fits the narrative.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:11 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top