Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I don't care what a biased verdict, with a judge who refused to let murder victims be referred to as victims, decided. I can recognize murder and call it that
They chased down the wrong guy. It did not go well with them.
I don't care what a biased verdict, with a judge who refused to let murder victims be referred to as victims, decided. I can recognize murder and call it that
Another leftistX, completely disconnected from reality.
I don't care what a biased verdict, with a judge who refused to let murder victims be referred to as victims, decided. I can recognize murder and call it that
Yep. Just like the Rottenhouse worshippers on this board all probably consider OJ Simpson a murderer -- I do, too, for that matter -- we can see that this kid got off lightly. I hope he can live with himself now
Yep. Just like the Rottenhouse worshippers on this board all probably consider OJ Simpson a murderer -- I do, too, for that matter -- we can see that this kid got off lightly. I hope he can live with himself now
Quite the strawman argument. I don’t recall anything about OJ acting in self defense
He’ll live with himself and very well, especially when he cashes in.
Yep. Just like the Rottenhouse worshippers on this board all consider OJ Simpson a murderer -- I do, too, foor that matter -- we can see that this kid got off lightly. I hope he can live with himself now
Yeah, the media and Democrats tried and convicted him in the trial of public opinion. Were any of you there? Anyone witnessed it? Were anyone in the court room watching and listening to the evidence? Do you know that we all have a right to assume innocent until proven quilty, not quilty until proven innocent.
There was no case. It was self defense all the way. The narrative was to go after Kyle and hope he would be convicted. Well, this jury took their time and looked at all the evidence that it was self defense. The mob was out for blood.
Yep-seems sad that a 17 year old child had to do more to protect the city than the mayor, the police, the governor or the residents did. But, hopefully people have learned from this-that they don't have to be victims of a mob of violent criminals and that they have the right to defend themselves.
In my city, last summer the nutjobs hit Spokane, the next city to the west in a small-scale riot. Some looting, a bunch of smashed windows, vandalizing. The word was out that they were coming to my town the next night. That night-the streets were lined with several hundred of us, armed with everything from duck guns to the latest ARs and SCARs. The thugs turned around and left. Not one smashed window, not one fire, zero looting, no one hurt. THAT IS HOW YOU ANSWER THESE MOBS.
And if a black resident from cross town came to join you guys, I wonder what his life chances would have been. Especially if he walked in like the rest of you did.
Yep. Just like the Rottenhouse worshippers on this board all probably consider OJ Simpson a murderer -- I do, too, for that matter -- wecan see that this kid got off lightly. I hope he can live with himself now
Quote:
Originally Posted by erieguy
Quite the strawman argument. I don’t recall anything about OJ acting in self defense
So it's not a perfect analogy! Sue me!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.