Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-25-2022, 11:02 PM
 
Location: San Diego
18,724 posts, read 7,602,949 times
Reputation: 14996

Advertisements

Someone was bound to pull this.

My only question is:

How can any state "obstruct or discriminate" something (enforcement of immigration federal laws) that doesn't exist? And hasn't existed for many months?

----------------------------------

https://www.statesman.com/story/news...ct/6510864001/

Gov. Abbott’s border crackdown Operation Lone Star violates U.S. Constitution, Travis County judge says

by Tony Plohetski, Katie Hall
Austin American-Statesman
Jan. 14, 2022

Gov. Greg Abbott’s border enforcement effort violates the U.S. Constitution, a Travis County state district judge on Thursday ruled, threatening Operation Lone Star's future and opening the gates to a flood of court challenges.

Travis County state District Judge Jan Soifer's ruling came in a legal challenge to the detention of a man from Ecuador who is seeking asylum. The man at the center of Thursday's hearing — Jesus Alberto Guzman Curipoma, an engineer with no criminal history — was arrested Sept. 17 at a railroad switching yard on a misdemeanor criminal trespassing charge in Kinney County, along the Texas-Mexico border about 200 miles south of Austin. He has since been released on bond and remains in Texas.

Guzman Curipoma's attorney contended that Abbott’s operation violates the supremacy clause of the U.S. Constitution, which stipulates that federal laws supersede state laws and that states cannot “obstruct or discriminate” with enforcement of immigration federal laws.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-26-2022, 06:35 AM
 
62,924 posts, read 29,119,973 times
Reputation: 18573
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roboteer View Post
Someone was bound to pull this.

My only question is:

How can any state "obstruct or discriminate" something (enforcement of immigration federal laws) that doesn't exist? And hasn't existed for many months?

----------------------------------

https://www.statesman.com/story/news...ct/6510864001/

Gov. Abbott’s border crackdown Operation Lone Star violates U.S. Constitution, Travis County judge says

by Tony Plohetski, Katie Hall
Austin American-Statesman
Jan. 14, 2022

Gov. Greg Abbott’s border enforcement effort violates the U.S. Constitution, a Travis County state district judge on Thursday ruled, threatening Operation Lone Star's future and opening the gates to a flood of court challenges.

Travis County state District Judge Jan Soifer's ruling came in a legal challenge to the detention of a man from Ecuador who is seeking asylum. The man at the center of Thursday's hearing — Jesus Alberto Guzman Curipoma, an engineer with no criminal history — was arrested Sept. 17 at a railroad switching yard on a misdemeanor criminal trespassing charge in Kinney County, along the Texas-Mexico border about 200 miles south of Austin. He has since been released on bond and remains in Texas.

Guzman Curipoma's attorney contended that Abbott’s operation violates the supremacy clause of the U.S. Constitution, which stipulates that federal laws supersede state laws and that states cannot “obstruct or discriminate” with enforcement of immigration federal laws.
So our states aren't allowed to protect themselves from an illegal invasion when the feds fail to do so? Huh?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2022, 06:37 AM
 
Location: New York City
19,061 posts, read 12,714,563 times
Reputation: 14783
I find this hard to believe, zoning laws are locally decided. If a border town allows permits for 20 foot tall walls that is within the prerogative of the landowner to build that wall. He is free to have it financed by the state of any third party. Same for state owned property.

It's called property rights, must be a disturbing concept for progressives
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2022, 07:00 AM
 
Location: Salisbury,NC
16,759 posts, read 8,210,275 times
Reputation: 8537
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roboteer View Post
Someone was bound to pull this.

My only question is:

How can any state "obstruct or discriminate" something (enforcement of immigration federal laws) that doesn't exist? And hasn't existed for many months?

----------------------------------

https://www.statesman.com/story/news...ct/6510864001/

Gov. Abbott’s border crackdown Operation Lone Star violates U.S. Constitution, Travis County judge says

by Tony Plohetski, Katie Hall
Austin American-Statesman
Jan. 14, 2022

Gov. Greg Abbott’s border enforcement effort violates the U.S. Constitution, a Travis County state district judge on Thursday ruled, threatening Operation Lone Star's future and opening the gates to a flood of court challenges.

Travis County state District Judge Jan Soifer's ruling came in a legal challenge to the detention of a man from Ecuador who is seeking asylum. The man at the center of Thursday's hearing — Jesus Alberto Guzman Curipoma, an engineer with no criminal history — was arrested Sept. 17 at a railroad switching yard on a misdemeanor criminal trespassing charge in Kinney County, along the Texas-Mexico border about 200 miles south of Austin. He has since been released on bond and remains in Texas.

Guzman Curipoma's attorney contended that Abbott’s operation violates the supremacy clause of the U.S. Constitution, which stipulates that federal laws supersede state laws and that states cannot “obstruct or discriminate” with enforcement of immigration federal laws.
I see that there are FEDERAL LAWS that supersede state laws. Those laws are being enforced. Apparently, we are missing something in this story. Like was Guzman already in the system trying for asylum. Was he released by the Federal court waiting for his hearing on his application? So some items are missing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2022, 07:09 AM
 
9,434 posts, read 4,250,820 times
Reputation: 7018
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roboteer View Post
Someone was bound to pull this.

My only question is:

How can any state "obstruct or discriminate" something (enforcement of immigration federal laws) that doesn't exist? And hasn't existed for many months?

----------------------------------

https://www.statesman.com/story/news...ct/6510864001/

.
Federal immigration laws most certainly exist.
They just may not exist in the way that you want them to exist.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top