Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Here is #9. Thankfully, he did stop short of saying God created Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve, which usually follows this kind of rhetoric.
Men are men, women are women, and
unborn babies are babies. We believe in
science: Men and women are biologically different,
“male and female He created them.” Modern technology has
confirmed that abortion takes a human life. Facts are facts,
the earth is round, the sun is hot, there are two genders,
and abortion stops a beating heart. To say otherwise is to deny science.
Show specifically where anything is factually incorrect.
So, if a child is born to a single mother, she won't be able to get food for the child?
But if the child has two parents living in the home, and they fall on hard times, there will be food and other support available?
We don't know what #9 means. Your guess is as good as mine. I do know, there is a fervor broiling below the surface to outlaw gay marriage. And that's what that looks like to me.
Where in the Sam Hill did you get "a single mother . . . won't be able to get food for the child" out of anything written in the document that is the subject of this thread?
Here is #9. Thankfully, he did stop short of saying God created Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve, which usually follows this kind of rhetoric.
Men are men, women are women, and
unborn babies are babies. We believe in
science: Men and women are biologically different,
“male and female He created them.” Modern technology has
confirmed that abortion takes a human life. Facts are facts,
the earth is round, the sun is hot, there are two genders,
and abortion stops a beating heart. To say otherwise is to deny science.
Other than the overtly religious overtones, how did you get anti gay marriage from any of that ? He's obviously not pro choice, that I get.
Here is #9. Thankfully, he did stop short of saying God created Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve, which usually follows this kind of rhetoric.
Men are men, women are women, and
unborn babies are babies. We believe in
science: Men and women are biologically different,
“male and female He created them.” Modern technology has
confirmed that abortion takes a human life. Facts are facts,
the earth is round, the sun is hot, there are two genders,
and abortion stops a beating heart. To say otherwise is to deny science.
I see absolutely nothing wrong with any of this. Even if you don't believe in God, what else that's written here do you dispute?
Where in the Sam Hill did you get "a single mother . . . won't be able to get food for the child" out of anything written in the document that is the subject of this thread?
You have to follow the conversation. I bothered to quote the poster I was responding to, if you cared to read the post. This:
you dont take kids from families but you DONT SUBSIDISE people for not having 2 parent households.
Here is #9. Thankfully, he did stop short of saying God created Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve, which usually follows this kind of rhetoric.
Men are men, women are women, and
unborn babies are babies. We believe in
science: Men and women are biologically different,
“male and female He created them.” Modern technology has
confirmed that abortion takes a human life. Facts are facts,
the earth is round, the sun is hot, there are two genders,
and abortion stops a beating heart. To say otherwise is to deny science.
Yeah, no hatred or dismissal for people who identify or think differently.
All Americans should pay some
income tax to have skin in the
game, even if a small amount.
Currently over half of Americans
pay no income tax.
This is an example of the stigma the GOP has when it comes to hating poor people. Which is why I ask myself why should I as a black working class dude who's not making 6 figures, vote for these people? They want to tax me. No better than the Demwits.
I clicked on it, hoping to see some greatness. There were a few good ideas in there, and a lot of bad ones.
Example:
Quote:
No child will be taught they are inherently racist because of the color of their skin, or that some Americans are oppressors and others are oppressed.
Why should we be afraid to teach our kids the harsh reality that there are some oppressors out there. Failing to alert them of the real world only results in more targets to oppress.
Quote:
Parents, not government, will choose the best schools for their kids.
As it currently is. If a parent wants to send their kid to a private school, they can. I just don't want my tax dollars going to vouchers.
Quote:
... not indoctrinate children with critical race theory or any other political ideology.
But then it contradicts with
Quote:
No public school will be allowed to discriminate against voluntary prayer or force children to check their faith at the door.
^Again, there is no rule anywhere that prohibits voluntary prayer of an individual. But he correctly states that the schools should not indoctrinate, so they should not organize prayer either. Let kids practice their faith, any faith, privately and as they see fit. School is for learning, not indoctrination. (He got that one right)
That was just the first point, I could go on and on, but the main point is this:
He said a bunch of things, with no plans on how to implement them. Just a bunch of partisan talking points. I was hoping that he'd have some solutions, there are none.
I ABSOLUTELY AGREE that many of these things need to happen, but not in the biased way he's proposing, and there needs some leadership on how to do it.
Also, you can't say that you won't allow revisionist history, and in the same breath, say you'll outlaw points of view about our history that don't align with your donors and base. (CRT).
He's full of it. It's a very divisive document, even refers to "the radical left". That is not bringing anyone together. How about he acknowledges mulitiple points of view, and provides some leadership on how to incorporate diverse ideas. NOPE!!!!!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
