Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Originally Posted by paracord View Post
"EVs" still require fossil fuels, they require stopping and charging (if you can find one) multiple times in a long trip and waiting long periods of time, and they require overnight charging.
Many people don't have garages to charge their "EV" overnight.
Electric cars are the dumbest idea ever invented, and there's a reason they still only have 2% market penetration after 20 years.
People who want to virtue signal bought them, that's it. Functionally, they are worse, and they cost more to boot!
Gas, even at 4.50, is still cheaper that almost any other form of energy, and the USA has oodles of natural resources for it.
EV IS NOT the future.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Airborneguy
There's been plenty of common sense displayed on both sides throughout this thread. None of which has come from posts like this. lol
I wish that 5 years from now we can check in with people like this to see how they're doing.
Originally Posted by paracord View Post
"EVs" still require fossil fuels, they require stopping and charging (if you can find one) multiple times in a long trip and waiting long periods of time, and they require overnight charging.
Many people don't have garages to charge their "EV" overnight.
Electric cars are the dumbest idea ever invented, and there's a reason they still only have 2% market penetration after 20 years.
People who want to virtue signal bought them, that's it. Functionally, they are worse, and they cost more to boot!
Gas, even at 4.50, is still cheaper that almost any other form of energy, and the USA has oodles of natural resources for it.
EV IS NOT the future.
lol, his is the smartest post yet, lol
4.50 is not cheaper than what i pay to charge ray. My EV is perfect for what i use it for my man.
Location: East of Seattle since 1992, 615' Elevation, Zone 8b - originally from SF Bay Area
44,585 posts, read 81,206,701 times
Reputation: 57821
Quote:
Originally Posted by tewest86
My F150 has the 36 gal tank. It costs me $148 to fill up.
I have the 36 gallon too, but I fill it up at just above 1/4. The pump only allows up to $100 on a debit card and I don't like to do do two transactions to get full.
I have the 36 gallon too, but I fill it up at just above 1/4. The pump only allows up to $100 on a debit card and I don't like to do do two transactions to get full.
With current price of diesel. the Ram I sold would cost $250 to tank up compared to about $6 for my Tesla. If I owned the Rivian truck, it would be about $11 to charge up in my garage.
With current price of diesel. the Ram I sold would cost $250 to tank up compared to about $6 for my Tesla. If I owned the Rivian truck, it would be about $11 to charge up in my garage.
I saw an actual Rivian truck in person for the first time last weekend and I want to like it, but I can’t get past that ugly front end. It’s also smaller than what I had envisioned based on the pictures I’ve seen online. But, I like trucks and SUVs, so I’m looking forward to seeing how other manufacturers evolve their designs.
With current price of diesel. the Ram I sold would cost $250 to tank up compared to about $6 for my Tesla. If I owned the Rivian truck, it would be about $11 to charge up in my garage.
Not getting why you keep comparing a 1-Ton truck to a little sedan. Talk about apples-to-oranges....
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.