Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-15-2022, 09:40 PM
 
Location: 23.7 million to 162 million miles North of Venus
23,593 posts, read 12,535,636 times
Reputation: 10477

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by WRM20 View Post
Laura Ingraham is talented at nothing. She is an empty headed waste of air time.

Moderators should push back if a candidate is stupidly lying.
Since when?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-15-2022, 11:05 PM
 
10,130 posts, read 19,882,004 times
Reputation: 5815
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strannik33 View Post
The OP's post headline is silly. GOP is not afraid of the debates, they are sick and tired of debating both the dems and the moderators selected by this supposedly nonpartisan.
If the GOP’s candidate didn’t insist on lying about basic facts and breaking the debate rules, they’d have nothing to worry about with the moderators. But since they can’t, or won’t, maintain decorum, they’re choosing to take their ball and go home. Either way is fine with me.

If the GOP does refuse debates, I hope they bring in the Libertarian candidate to debate the Democrat. That might give some moderate Republicans and Independents another candidate to consider.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2022, 12:00 AM
 
6,205 posts, read 7,460,466 times
Reputation: 3563
The moderators “are biased”? Well, the GOP approved them before the debates, didn’t they?

But that’s not a big deal. Looking back at debates from the last 20 years, I don’t think they changed much. The media has a party. They are all hyper, but after the dust settles, each side thinks their candidate won. “Reaching voters” is more of a myth.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2022, 12:22 AM
 
13,460 posts, read 4,292,364 times
Reputation: 5390
Quote:
Originally Posted by atxcio View Post
If the GOP’s candidate didn’t insist on lying about basic facts and breaking the debate rules, they’d have nothing to worry about with the moderators. But since they can’t, or won’t, maintain decorum, they’re choosing to take their ball and go home. Either way is fine with me.

If the GOP does refuse debates, I hope they bring in the Libertarian candidate to debate the Democrat. That might give some moderate Republicans and Independents another candidate to consider.

Weren't "moderators" caught in giving the questions to Democrat candidates before the debate?

Like Democrats tell the truth in debates. So much truth from the Democrat's mouths


The only candidates NOT to consider are in the Democrat party.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2022, 12:45 AM
 
Location: San Diego
1,538 posts, read 1,483,810 times
Reputation: 1591
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grlzrl View Post
Jesus, the moderators in the debates with Trump were literally debating him, too. They never followed up on any tough questions on Biden. It was clear they were biased.
When you spew nonsense it gets called out duh.

John, former GOP member.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2022, 12:55 AM
 
Location: New Jersey and hating it
12,199 posts, read 7,225,101 times
Reputation: 17473
Quote:
Originally Posted by WRM20 View Post
Laura Ingraham is talented at nothing. She is an empty headed waste of air time.

Moderators should push back if a candidate is stupidly lying.
You are a Leftist. Every non Leftist is empty headed to you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2022, 09:19 PM
 
15,590 posts, read 15,672,796 times
Reputation: 21999
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redsoxrob View Post
The real issue is that they think the moderators are biased towards liberals.The moderators last time around seemed to push back on the lies that the GOP candidate would try to push, and that got their panties in a whirl. I don't think they are saying they will not do ANY debates, just not debates sponsored by the Commission. It's their way of trying to get home field advantage. While I think it is a little chickenchit myself, I can also understand and respect their reasoning. It's nothing more than a strategic move to gain more power over the debate format.
Thank you - but aren't panties supposed to be in a "twist," not a whirl?



Quote:
Originally Posted by SanJuanStar View Post
Moderators have liberal bias because all of them come from the liberal media. The job of a moderator is not to push back or debate the candidate or make the debate about them or for the team.
Most moderators have come from news outlets that have traditionally been considered moderate/cntrist (at least before recent years when the GOP thinks every place except Fox is liberal). Can you give any examples?

You have not seen, for instance, Rachel Maddow moderating. I don't find that moderator "push back" except to occasionally try to keep the reply on-topic or, rarely, counter outright lies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2022, 09:35 PM
 
6,822 posts, read 14,034,515 times
Reputation: 5753
Well if you ask a GOP candidate was the election stolen you will see why they want to avoid any type of debate. You either lie and accept the wrath of the red hat brigade. It's a no win situation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2022, 09:42 PM
 
Location: 23.7 million to 162 million miles North of Venus
23,593 posts, read 12,535,636 times
Reputation: 10477
Quote:
Originally Posted by SanJuanStar View Post
Weren't "moderators" caught in giving the questions to Democrat candidates before the debate?

Like Democrats tell the truth in debates. So much truth from the Democrat's mouths


The only candidates NOT to consider are in the Democrat party.
Yep. Cheating by dems must be the "decorum" that poster was talking about.

Last edited by berdee; 03-18-2022 at 10:46 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2022, 09:43 PM
 
Location: 23.7 million to 162 million miles North of Venus
23,593 posts, read 12,535,636 times
Reputation: 10477
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grainraiser View Post
Well if you ask a GOP candidate was the election stolen you will see why they want to avoid any type of debate. You either lie and accept the wrath of the red hat brigade. It's a no win situation.
What is this "wrath of the red hat brigade" that you speak of?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:30 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top