Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If you want to see an uproar, you take away social security.
I'd give the people all their money back, w/ a reasonable return upon investment, & allow all future wage earner to keep all their earnings, and invest as they see fit.
I'd do the same for unemployment, & medicare....no more payroll taxes or deductions...you earn $1,000/wk, you take home $1,000 a week. I could sell that easily.
I'd give the people all their money back, w/ a reasonable return upon investment, & allow all future wage earner to keep all their earnings, and invest as they see fit.
I'd do the same for unemployment, & medicare....no more payroll taxes or deductions...you earn $1,000/wk, you take home $1,000 a week. I could sell that easily.
We should get rid of the New Deal entirely. We need to put ordinary Americans back in their proper place.
I love these dream posts. It really makes me wonder what they are drinking or smoking.
No medicare, yeah that will go over big.
Who provides your health insurance? What do you pay a month?
An argument could certainly be made that parts of the country no longer meet the threshold for civilized that was used to justifying the imposition of income tax
I'd give the people all their money back, w/ a reasonable return upon investment, & allow all future wage earner to keep all their earnings, and invest as they see fit.
I'd do the same for unemployment, & medicare....no more payroll taxes or deductions...you earn $1,000/wk, you take home $1,000 a week. I could sell that easily.
If people had to write a check every month for their tax liability, I bet a lot of government overreach would go away. People would refuse to support anything that would cause their taxes to be increased.
seems like some don't understand how SCOTUS works. they don't pick and choose laws or former rulings and change them.
All it takes is a trial from a lower court to get the ball rolling...it's not that tough if its a case the SCOTUS wants to hear, & feels its their jurisdiction.
They do get to pick and choose which judgements they'll hear.
Never happen. If you want to lose the entire voting block of seniors, just try it.
I think I heard those exact words in regards to overturning Roe v. Wade.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
