Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Notice they take place where they can be certain there is little if any resistance.
How do you get this? Tulsa, San Antonio, Las Vegas, seem to me places where people would be armed (if that’s what you mean). Or do you mean places like schools and hospitals?
the reality is, our country will always have guns. And so you better figure out how to identify those who are dangerous and remove the guns from them.
We've already got 1 criteria - felons. Now, some felons shouldn't have guns and the possession of one by them should be swiftly and severely prosecuted. And some felons should be able to have guns, depending largely on the existence of violence (or guns) to arrive at the felony charge.
I actually think felon is way too broad a word. If you get convicted of insider trading or tax evasion, you’re a felon. I don’t see any reason why Martha Stewart shouldn’t be able to have a gun.
They also had another thing in common... a gun/rifle/weapon.
Now before you go off the deep end with that one.... I'm not saying the gun itself caused the mass shooting... just no more than SSRI.
There are many things mass shooters have in common. It doesn't mean you can cherry pick your pet peeve to blame it on without evidence of a direct cause. Plenty of people on medications that don't go on a mass shooting... just like plenty of gun owners also don't go on a mass shooting.
They also had another thing in common... a gun/rifle/weapon.
Now before you go off the deep end with that one.... I'm not saying the gun itself caused the mass shooting... just no more than SSRI.
There are many things mass shooters have in common. It doesn't mean you can cherry pick your pet peeve to blame it on without evidence of a direct cause. Plenty of people on medications that don't go on a mass shooting... just like plenty of gun owners also don't go on a mass shooting.
So mentally unstable individuals who are medication because they are mentallly unstable may be more inclined to become mass shooters.
Is it their mentally unstable condition or the drugs?
Some want to blame the drugs.
And then blame pharmaceutical companies, and then blame liberals because -- all liberals are bad.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
