Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-08-2022, 01:26 PM
 
9,902 posts, read 4,663,177 times
Reputation: 7524

Advertisements

California/Newsom want to produce their own insulin. Is Newsom channeling Cuomo ie his own sanitizer made by inmates?

https://ktla.com/news/local-news/new...-cost-insulin/

The more choices the better that is good. But then what about other 'common' drugs. Why not this one or that one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-08-2022, 01:52 PM
 
6,389 posts, read 2,718,141 times
Reputation: 6133
This from the same State that requires its own gas blend, and because of that generally has the highest fuel costs in the Country.

Yea, I am sure that this will work out perfectly for the people that need it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2022, 03:22 PM
 
Location: Ohio
1,884 posts, read 1,005,458 times
Reputation: 2871
It's like energy dependence, except it's bad because liberals are doing it. I see no good reason why a 100-year-old drug can't be cheap, except for pure greed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2022, 03:29 PM
 
Location: The Piedmont of North Carolina
6,056 posts, read 2,859,408 times
Reputation: 7691
Quote:
Originally Posted by Haksel257 View Post
It's like energy dependence, except it's bad because liberals are doing it. I see no good reason why a 100-year-old drug can't be cheap, except for pure greed.
Have you ever considered that insulin is expensive because its ingredients are expensive?

To make it cheaper would mean cutting costs. First of all, to cut costs, the last place you reduce cost is by manufacturing in California. Second, it would involve cheaper ingredients. Is that really how you want your medicine formulated?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2022, 03:32 PM
 
Location: My house
7,394 posts, read 3,546,926 times
Reputation: 7796
Quote:
Originally Posted by MeagetSeager View Post
You can thank that for your grand kids not being lead poisoned…
huh? please explain what on earth you are talking about
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2022, 03:36 PM
 
34,279 posts, read 19,394,707 times
Reputation: 17261
Quote:
Originally Posted by FordBronco1967 View Post
Have you ever considered that insulin is expensive because its ingredients are expensive?

To make it cheaper would mean cutting costs. First of all, to cut costs, the last place you reduce cost is by manufacturing in California. Second, it would involve cheaper ingredients. Is that really how you want your medicine formulated?
LOL. the components are so expensive?

Bwahahahahha. Yeah no. Its about $5 a vial in components. They could DOUBLE the cost of ingredients and make a 100% profit...and STILL be the cheapest out there. Vials of Insulin right now run $50 to $400 depending on who you get it from.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2022, 03:39 PM
 
Location: Ohio
1,884 posts, read 1,005,458 times
Reputation: 2871
Quote:
Originally Posted by FordBronco1967 View Post
Have you ever considered that insulin is expensive because its ingredients are expensive?

To make it cheaper would mean cutting costs. First of all, to cut costs, the last place you reduce cost is by manufacturing in California. Second, it would involve cheaper ingredients. Is that really how you want your medicine formulated?
I have considered it. Insulin prices vary a criminal amount around the world, you can't fool me. You may have a point about CA being too big of a manufacturing cost (although I doubt it). But you forgot the "sacrilegious" alternative to price gouging: undercut insane pharma profits.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2022, 03:46 PM
 
Location: A Nation Possessed
25,810 posts, read 18,857,526 times
Reputation: 22658
I wish they would produce their own everything. Including their own nation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2022, 03:56 PM
 
6,389 posts, read 2,718,141 times
Reputation: 6133
Liberal logic and misdirection at work...

Quote:
Newsom said that the state budget he recently signed includes $100 million for California to “contract and make [its] own insulin at a cheaper price, close to at cost, and to make it available to all.”

He said $50 million of that budget will go to the development of the low-cost insulin, while the additional $50 million will go toward a California-based manufacturing facility for the drug, which Newsom claims “will provide new, high-paying jobs and a stronger supply chain.”
The claim from Democrats is that "Big Pharma" is just gouging the consumer. They've called for investigations and use this as a reason why they need price controls.

But now the Governor needs $50 Million to "develop" low-cost insulin. Why does he need 50 Million to develop something they say already exists if Big Pharma would just stop gouging the consumer?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2022, 04:36 PM
 
4,662 posts, read 1,956,735 times
Reputation: 4652
Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar View Post
LOL. the components are so expensive?

Bwahahahahha. Yeah no. Its about $5 a vial in components. They could DOUBLE the cost of ingredients and make a 100% profit...and STILL be the cheapest out there. Vials of Insulin right now run $50 to $400 depending on who you get it from.
It's not that simple although many people dont understand Insulin, The cheapest type of Insulin which has been around for 100 years is very cheap to buy. You can go into Walmart and without a prescription get a vial of it(one month supply) for 25 bucks. The newer insulins are much more expensive to produce, dont get me wrong they still gauge you but its not dirt cheap. The older Walmart type 25 bucks Insulin works just fine but requires more self monitoring and control as they are less consistent on how well they control your sugar. Still if you are short on money its a very viable option. This whole Insulin issue is more a political talking point than anything else.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top