Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I didn't watch the video, but what you described sounds horrific. You've surely been on the numerous threads here about abortion, and know that many (most?) of us who are pro-choice would be completely disgusted by this.
Not only it disgusting and morally wrong, but it serves to continue dividing us, with pro-lifers seeing this extreme and lumping it in with a much more moderate position, such as favoring first trimester abortions (plus later for serious, extenuating circumstances.)
the relevant part is page 30 of the document, page 38 of the pdf.
I (mostly) understand the 3 that were fetal anomalies (1) and previable (2). But WTF about the 2 that were only given "comfort care" and allowed to die?
the relevant part is page 30 of the document, page 38 of the pdf.
I (mostly) understand the 3 that were fetal anomalies (1) and previable (2). But WTF about the 2 that were only given "comfort care" and allowed to die?
You would think with all the data they are collecting in this document that they would give more detail on that.
It has been known that this goes on for a long time. I recall news stories years ago of live fetuses being left in utility closets to die. The left didn't have a problem with it then and they definitely don't today, since the left is so much more debauched today.
what the heck,..how many babies were being aborted per day previously?
This sounds like some factory rollout that got jammed.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.