Look what showed up on the CDC Antiviral Treatments For COVID... It's Ivermectin! (money, claims)

[erieguy]

Originally Posted by suzy_q2010

Steroids are cheap and recommended in more serious cases.

Both vaccines and Paxlovid work. Effectiveness of the vaccines wanes and boosters help.




Steriods are cheap and used on more serious cases.

Quite the strawman argument. Ivermectin is cheap but not recommended

[Floorist]

Originally Posted by suzy_q2010

The risk of a serious adverse effect from the covid vaccines is very low.

And what about the 500,000 reported serious side effects?

[erieguy]

Originally Posted by suzy_q2010

Ivermectin is not recommended because there is no evidence it works.

Proof that it doesn’t?

[erieguy]

Originally Posted by suzy_q2010

You cannot prove a negative. It is up to the ivermectin promoters to show it does.

In other words, there’s no proof that it doesn’t work …and the fact is that there’s hUUUge money in the experimental shots.

Your premise has been that what the OP posted is untrue, however, it’s not.

[Floorist]

Originally Posted by suzy_q2010

Reported where?

VAERS. Just ask a real doctor.

[kimba01]

Originally Posted by Greenvalleyfan

This is not the first thread on this topic. There have been plenty of people on this site self medicating with ivermectin. If ivermectin is prescribed and one's PHYSICIAN thinks it a benefit to a patient, great!
I'd take it! I don't care what a person takes. But, I wouldn't take any medication unless someone that has a doctorate in medicine says I should take it for a certain ailment.

Those with a doctorate can be wrong. They have been. Most get their information elsewhere and then use that to prescribe. If you find a good Dr. you trust, that's great. Sometimes you have to weed through the mire. There are those Drs that graduated at the bottom...

[erieguy]

Originally Posted by suzy_q2010

There is no way to prove it does not work. It is up to those who think it does work to provide evidence that it does, in properly conducted randomized clinical trials, comparing it to the current standard of care.

As I’ve said, no proof…and the fact is it’s cheap, while the experimental shots are hUUUge money.

[Floorist]

Originally Posted by erieguy

As I’ve said, no proof…and the fact is it’s cheap, while the experimental shots are hUUUge money.

She is either naive or working for big pharma.

[erieguy]

Originally Posted by Floorist

She is either naive or working for big pharma.

Certainly a possibility, along with believing everything the media, CDC, government, etc…, tells them.

Funny thing about the shot is that Sleepy Joe and the Dems wouldn’t endorse it, and when it magically appeared after the election, they did a 180, and couldn’t get folks to take it, lol.

[Chuckity]

Originally Posted by suzy_q2010

If it worked, they would recommend using it.

No they wouldn’t.

There is too much money still on the table and too many people amassing wealth over vaccines and Paxlovid.

But it’s cute how much you still believe in the CDC & Big Pharma.